Originally posted by: ADDAvenger
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: ADDAvenger
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: ADDAvenger
My theology prof says Allah is not God, even though Islam and Christianity overlap in a lot of places.
According to him, the god of Islam, Allah, is described and thought about very differently than God, the Christian god. For example, in the Muslim creation account, Allah brings all the animals to Adam and tells him their names. In the Christian creation account, God brings all the animals to Adam and lets Adam name them. It may be a subtle so-what difference, but it implies that Allah is a god that shows you everything then tells you what to do, while God is a god that shows you everything then asks you what you will do. That's important because it's the difference between orders being handed down, and the possibility for two-way communication.
Unfortunately that's the only example he's given so far, and this is my first theology class so I really don't know too much about it myself.
Was that same God of two-way communication the one who destroyed the tower of Babel?
Destroyed what? Babel was where the languages were confused; before babel everyone had the same language, then people decided they were so great and powerful that they'd just build a tower to heaven and go up there, so God confused them. They just gave up on babel once their languages were confused, there's no mention of it being destroyed.
Anyway, God isn't a flat personality, he's a three-dimensional person and you can't make wide-ranging conclusions off of one or two individual pieces of data. That would be akin to saying your dad doesn't love you because he spanked and sent you to your room when you were a kid, since no loving parent would
ever want their kid to hurt. Just because God's goal is communication and reconsiliation doesn't mean he's bound to do nothing but continually reach out all the time.
That's what I mean by destroying. He ended the effort by destroying their ability to communicate, this God you claimed that prises communication. And don't even get me started on whether telling somebody the name of an animal is more top-down than is forcing everybody on earth to speak a different language. You are, in short, engaged in a profound case of rationalization that is utter rubbish. But one has to admire the fact that one in a first semester theology class is already able to speak for God on His parenting style.
😉
Actually it's a second-semester course, and half the class is made of upperclassmen
😉
When we say that God prizes communication, we mean God-human communication. Yeah of course human-human communication is great too, but the goal isn't just to talk and hang out and do whatever. Throughout the Bible, God's plan is to bring people back to him after they rejected him (the Fall in the Garden of Eden). You can't reconcile yourself to someone that you never have communication with, that's what I was originally getting at. God still has the ability to communicate with everyone, regardless of their native language, so Babel didn't complicate things for him. Babel complicated things for people; God did it because the people were so prideful that they thought they could build a tower to heaven and challenge God. It's not like God planned for us to have all these languages, but basically God just had to show us who's boss.
Cliffs:
Changing around people's languages wasn't something that took away from people's free will; we can still choose to ignore God. Changing the languages was God's way of humbling a bunch of people so prideful they thought they could build a tower to heaven and challenge God.