Interesting approach tincart. You want me to define proof. How about proof?
No definition necessary. Proof as would be accepted in court I suppose. In other words, ACTUAL data PROVING sabotage.
This may be hard to grasp, but you can't define something by using the word you are trying to define.
You also need to take into account the context of the word. "Proof" in the court of law means something very different from "proof" of some claim in molecular biology or "proof" in symbolic logic.
So what you've told me here is: nothing, and also nothing.
And what you call marketing meme is pretty much common knowledge throughout our enthusiast membership here. So yes, in that respect, I do have it down AS SHOULD YOU by now.
No, thanks.
This ^ got me laughing a bit. Let me guess which one of your "ways" Nvidia holds and which one ATI holds.
Let it hereby be noted that Keysplayr immediately turned this into a fan boy pissing match instead of a discussion. I said nothing about
AMD and I really don't care what they're doing since I've yet to find an AMD Evolved game that runs very poorly on my nVidia GTX 460.
If you are going to accuse, at least have proof, not blind hatred accusations or conspiracy theories.
And we have entered the realm of the absurd. Proof? Go back up to the top of my post. You have given every indication that you have no idea what that word even means in this context. You might as well be telling me "at least have kwyjibo!" or some other nonsense.
Blind hatred? What on earth are you on about? My suggestion is that the problems with Crysis 2 may indicate a
possible example of an attempt to degrade performance on competitors hardware. That is, I gave one example and qualified that with the skepticism of "possible".
If this goes on long enough, I think that it would be a wise thing to do to just call Nvidia the superior company all around.
Is that the marketing meme for next month?
You have a great career in politics ahead of you.
This post is a prime example of what we moderators mean when we say "needlessly inflammatory rhetoric".
This post is laced with needlessly inflammatory rhetoric that is engineered to accomplish little more than to bait the intended into a flamewar.
Knock off the inflammatory rhetoric. The debate above this post has been "heated" but within acceptable posting decorum.
If the discussion continues to spiral into the depths of inflammatory rhetoric then infractions will be handed out. The thread will NOT be closed regardless how poorly a few people conduct themselves, we aren't going to penalize everyone just because a few folks have communication issues.
We WILL be handing out gratuitous quantities of infractions though to those who work hard to earn them.
Idontcare
Super Moderator
Facebook
Twitter