dank69
Lifer
- Oct 6, 2009
- 37,391
- 33,048
- 136
We can catch up on sleep when we're dead.Must be neat to have a sleep pattern to disturb.
We can catch up on sleep when we're dead.Must be neat to have a sleep pattern to disturb.
We can catch up on sleep when we're dead.
One could see these adjustments as a benefit, not a detraction from your lifestyle. A little shakeup is good for most people, in fact practically everyone. A big shakeup too.It's not the "losing an hour of sleep" that's a bother, it's "completely altering my biological schedule so what was 7AM is now 8AM". Waking time changes, sleeping time changes, meal times change. That's what takes weeks to adjust to.
1) It depends. Normally I'd be on vacation, so I could probably just stay on my regular schedule.What do you do when you change timezones? What do you do when the sun comes up and goes down at different times (which happens literally everyday)?
The whole idea of DST is trading low utility day light hours for high utility day light hours. Having standard time year round would give up 238 extra high utility hours a year, so you don't have to loss 1 hour of sleep a year. That doesn't seem like a good trade to me.Sucks in the winter when it's still dark at 8AM.
I'd prefer standard time year round.
In order of preference:
Year Round Standard > Year Round DST > Switching back and forth.
One could see these adjustments as a benefit, not a detraction from your lifestyle. A little shakeup is good for most people, in fact practically everyone. A big shakeup too.
I heard a guy say some years ago that he thought it was a good idea to stay up way past your bedtime... occasionally.
Myself, the switcheroo Sunday was barely a blip on my radar. I'm not super patterned right now. The biggest issue for me was that hour+ getting 8 different devices changed. Some of those devices are complicated. Every one is different.
In fact, the number of heart attacks increased 24 percent on the Monday following a daylight saving time, compared with the daily average for the weeks surrounding the start of daylight saving time, according to a 2014 study in the journal Open Heart.
One could see these adjustments as a benefit, not a detraction from your lifestyle. A little shakeup is good for most people, in fact practically everyone. A big shakeup too.
I heard a guy say some years ago that he thought it was a good idea to stay up way past your bedtime... occasionally.
Myself, the switcheroo Sunday was barely a blip on my radar. I'm not super patterned right now. The biggest issue for me was that hour+ getting 8 different devices changed. Some of those devices are complicated. Every one is different.
That's basically, what I'm guessing. It's just wasted time apparently to my psyche. Got about 3 and a half last night.We can catch up on sleep when we're dead.
According to current science, I should be a babbling idiot, well into Alzheimer's, with my sleeping history. Maybe I should phrase that differently, I'm sure some of you would agree with the babbling idiot part.Lack of sleep being right up there with stress as a cause of many health-related issues I beg to differwe need to learn to relax more as a whole in our frenetic world imho.
The heart attacks are likely just brought forward. DST didn't clog the artery.This shakeup brings an increase in car accidents and heart attacks.
But what's a few car accidents and heart attacks?
![]()
'Spring forward' to daylight saving time brings surge in fatal car crashes
A study of 732,000 accidents over two decades has found that the annual switch to daylight saving time is associated with a 6% increase in fatal car crashes that week.www.sciencedaily.com
![]()
Watch Out: Daylight Saving Time May Cause Heart Attack Spike
Spring daylight saving is linked to an increased risk of heart attack, possibly because losing an hour of sleep can be stressful, experts say.www.livescience.com
Just because you don't feel that it isn't affecting you, doesn't mean that it isn't. People often don't notice that increased sleep deprivation, that leads to poorer reactions, judgement, and increased metabolic stress.
It's utterly brain dead, that we still inflict this nonsensical switch on the populous, given the evidence we have of it's detrimental outcomes.
When year-round DST was last used in the 1970s, many Americans criticized sending kids to school in the dark.

Hell, up here in Seattle area with DST, might as well not bother lighting any fireworks off on the 4th until about 9:45 when most of the glow in the west is gone. It was almost light at 6 am last week. Not now.From the article:
Growing up in Norway this is hilarious. Sunset was at 9:30, sunset at 3 pm. I went both to and from school in the dark! We were fine.. Of course our parents were responsible and put reflectors on our clothes.
Maybe look at wholistic research not research that is created to be biased right out of the gate. DST lasts 238 days, doesn't make sense to only look at 1 of those days and claim it's a bad policy. I do agree changing is poor policy, we should just go to DST year round. Year round standard time would be a horrible mistake in most of the US.
An AP-NORC poll from late 2019 found that just 31% of Americans wanted to move to daylight saving time all year around. That beat out the 28% who wanted to keep switching back and forth between daylight saving and standard time, but trailed 40% who yearned for standard time all year around.
More people are active at 7pm than 7 am. That's the whole point, move daylight from low utility hours to high utility hours.If we do DST year round the sun will never be at it's peak at noon, more like 1 pm. Noon is only "high noon" during "winter time". So wouldn't it be more natural to fall back once and then never change it again? Could argue that's the default time.
Or compormise and change it half hour once and then leave it?
View attachment 41298
It increases accident rate for a week after the change. Not one day. I am still having a harder time in the morning, and going to sleep at my regular time right now.
Also why assume that DST is an otherwise universal benefit, after the initial disruption.
I find the later evening sun, makes it harder to get to sleep at night, and would prefer STD even in summer.
Your preference for DST is just that, a personal preference, mine is different, and more people prefer year round Standard Time to year round DST:
https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/14/politics/daylight-saving-time-analysis/index.html
It decreases pedestrian and biking accidents for 238 days. If we went to year round DST, the week of increased accidents would go away, the avoided accidents would increase, though, resulting in even less total accidents.It increases accident rate for a week after the change. Not one day. I am still having a harder time in the morning, and going to sleep at my regular time right now.
Also why assume that DST is an otherwise universal benefit, after the initial disruption.
I find the later evening sun, makes it harder to get to sleep at night, and would prefer STD even in summer.
Your preference for DST is just that, a personal preference, mine is different, and more people prefer year round Standard Time to year round DST:
https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/14/politics/daylight-saving-time-analysis/index.html
Even in Omaha, NE, it's not ideal to set them off until 9:30-9:45PM on the 4th...Hell, up here in Seattle area with DST, might as well not bother lighting any fireworks off on the 4th until about 9:45 when most of the glow in the west is gone. It was almost light at 6 am last week. Not now.
I worked midnights for years, four nights, Thursday-Sunday. I got it at both ends of the switch.
More people are active at 7pm than 7 am. That's the whole point, move daylight from low utility hours to high utility hours.
It decreases pedestrian and biking accidents for 238 days. If we went to year round DST, the week of increased accidents would go away, the avoided accidents would increase, though, resulting in even less total accidents.
I doubt you are going to bed before sunset in the winter even with DST, if you are, you an unusual case.
I'm not assuming anything, there is plenty of data out there on the benefits, you just have to dig past all the "omg, these three days suck!" articles to get to it. This is why nearly every first world country uses some form of Day Light Savings. When Indiana dropped year round standard time, adult and child activity increased, employment increased, car accidents decreased, pedestrian and bicycle deaths decreased, and robberies decreased.
Kids being able to play with their parents after school is more important than your inability to adjust your biological clock to an hour one day, IMHO.
As far as going to bed with the sun up, either this only happens for a short part of the summer or it would still happen with standard time, just for less days. Because in most of the US sunset time changes by more than hour between the time change and summer solstice.
You need stats to back it up.
Otherwise it's still nothing more than a preference, and if we are being democratic, the #1 preference expressed is year round standard time.
I've already post some articles one this thread, feel free to find them and read them. Or look for articles yourself that deal with more than one week in March (which also corrolates with spring break across much of the south that could explain some of those accidents).You need stats to back it up.
Otherwise it's still nothing more than a preference, and if we are being democratic, the #1 preference expressed is year round standard time.
