dabuddha
Lifer
- Apr 10, 2000
- 19,579
- 17
- 81
Originally posted by: SammySon
First off, I don't smoke anymore, so the answer would be "No, I wouldn't because I don't smoke anymore".I'll ask this again. If your wife was pregent (or you have a newborn baby in the house) or if your kid had asthma, would you smoke around them?
If not, why? If yes, why?
If you answer no to either question, then you have no argument whatsover.
If I did still smoke, then the answer would be "Yes, I would because I'm a smoker."
Would I go out of my way to smoke in FRONT of them? Probably not. But I sure wouldn't go out of my way to NOT smoke around them.
Now, why is it if I answer "no" to either of thoes questions, then I have no argument? You didn't lay down any ground breaking information here, or present a question that makes me step back and think. Playing the child/pregnancy card is an easy way out.
Now, answer me a question. If your wife was pregnant, would you let her ride in a car?
More people die from car accidents than by smoking. So, if its SO dangerous to health, why would you subject her to that?
Please, think deeper before you try to pose a question that will trip me up.
Driving a car can be a necessity. Smoking is NOT Anyone that believes it is, is an idiot. Try using a better analogy, mmkay?