Conservatives love serial sexual harassers

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136

It's unfortunate that this means more harassment may have taken place, but at the same time... is anyone shocked that Hannity could be just as much of a scumbag to women as O'Reilly or Ailes? I mean, we knew he was already a general-purpose scumbag, but...

At this rate, Fox News will be hosted by Shep Smith and a few interns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,725
17,375
136
I'd be shocked if a company like fox who seemed to have a marketing gimmick of hiring attractive females to repeat stupid shit would have a culture of treating women like shit.

Its shocking, I tell you shocking!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

momeNt

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2011
9,290
352
126
I'd be shocked if a company like fox who seemed to have a marketing gimmick of hiring attractive females to repeat stupid shit would have a culture of treating women like shit.

Its shocking, I tell you shocking!

What? There are plenty of TV stations that hire attractive on-air talent and have not cultured an environment of sexual harassment. There are also plenty of businesses that hire attractive talent that have nothing to do with television and media and they do not have that sort of culture.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,838
20,433
146
What? There are plenty of TV stations that hire attractive on-air talent and have not cultured an environment of sexual harassment. There are also plenty of businesses that hire attractive talent that have nothing to do with television and media and they do not have that sort of culture.

Good for them, Fox news was the specific organization mentioned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

momeNt

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2011
9,290
352
126
Good for them, Fox news was the specific organization mentioned.

No it wasn't. Learn to read and comprehend. The post is basically that an organization with hiring practices like that can be expected to have a culture that treats women like shit. That's just simply not true and is a lazy assessment of Fox. Also implies that less than attractive women can't get harassed. It really was just a poor quality post all around, as is yours.
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
What? There are plenty of TV stations that hire attractive on-air talent and have not cultured an environment of sexual harassment. There are also plenty of businesses that hire attractive talent that have nothing to do with television and media and they do not have that sort of culture.

LOL. Been watching too much Hispanic/Latino TV stations, eh? Gotta love those weather girls.

Mexican+weather+girl+00.jpg


123178.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,838
20,433
146
No it wasn't. Learn to read and comprehend. The post is basically that an organization with hiring practices like that can be expected to have a culture that treats women like shit. That's just simply not true and is a lazy assessment of Fox. Also implies that less than attractive women can't get harassed. It really was just a poor quality post all around, as is yours.
It's a fair assessment of Fox, whether you like it or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

momeNt

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2011
9,290
352
126
It's a fair assessment of Fox, whether you like it or not.

Fox has a culture of sexual harassment, that much is apparent. They also hire attractive on air talent (possibly more than just on-air), the two often are mutually exclusive, many companies successfully hire attractive employees and do not sexually harassment. That is where I had my disagreement with the post. Not anything to do with Fox News sexual harassment, but by saying it is bound to happen because the women they hire are attractive is absurd.

How many attractive female employees would you need to be around before you were bound to sexually harass them? That's more or less my point.
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136
Fox has a culture of sexual harassment, that much is apparent. They also hire attractive on air talent (possibly more than just on-air), the two often are mutually exclusive, many companies successfully hire attractive employees and do not sexually harassment. That is where I had my disagreement with the post. Not anything to do with Fox News sexual harassment, but by saying it is bound to happen because the women they hire are attractive is absurd.

How many attractive female employees would you need to be around before you were bound to sexually harass them? That's more or less my point.

I'd agree with that. While I think we should get away from the strategy of hiring women simply because we believe pretty female faces boost ratings, the bigger issue here is that Fox's top male execs and on-air personalities act as if they're entitled to sex. Either make them mend their ways or (more likely) get rid of them.

The sad thing is that I'm not expecting a true cultural change so long as Fox News is basically a mouthpiece for the Republican party, and that's not going to happen when the Murdochs are still in charge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Sea Ray

Golden Member
May 30, 2013
1,459
31
91
O'Reilly sued the woman who was eventually paid $9 million. Evidently degenerates don't learn from mistakes at all.

That was O'Reilly's first mistake and it would have been fine so long as he didn't settle with 4 more women after that. You can't keep settling and still maintain you did nothing wrong. If he's innocent then he needs to stand up to one of them. Settling just invites more women to sue him and eventually this takes a toll on his reputation. He should know that.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
Funny how threatening a lawsuit causes people to "clarify" their statements. Bill O'Reilly can learn a thing or two from the younger Hannity.
It didn't help BillO, he tried that long before Hannity. If there's anything to hannity's behavior more will come forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

agent00f

Lifer
Jun 9, 2016
12,203
1,243
86
Funny how threatening a lawsuit causes people to "clarify" their statements. Bill O'Reilly can learn a thing or two from the younger Hannity.
That was O'Reilly's first mistake and it would have been fine so long as he didn't settle with 4 more women after that. You can't keep settling and still maintain you did nothing wrong. If he's innocent then he needs to stand up to one of them. Settling just invites more women to sue him and eventually this takes a toll on his reputation. He should know that.

Degenerates sure are degenerate.

Both in the OP article and subsequent posts it was mentioned that plantiffs had physical evidence of said behavior, but degenerates are obliged to pretend they can't read.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Sea Ray

Golden Member
May 30, 2013
1,459
31
91
Degenerates sure are degenerate.

Both in the OP article and subsequent posts it was mentioned that plantiffs had physical evidence of said behavior, but degenerates are obliged to pretend they can't read.

I have no idea about any evidence and neither do you. I think we can agree that it's awfully hard for O'Reilly to claim innocence after 5 settlements
 

SNC

Platinum Member
Jan 14, 2001
2,166
202
106
As mentioned nobody expects degenerates to acknowledge basic facts.

I've not followed this because, well, I don't really give a fuck. But if there is evidence and you know about it, how about sharing the link.
 

agent00f

Lifer
Jun 9, 2016
12,203
1,243
86
I've not followed this because, well, I don't really give a fuck. But if there is evidence and you know about it, how about sharing the link.
Since you don't state who you consider to be a degenerate or what basic facts you're referring to, your post is worthless

It's literally in the OP article and reiterated multiple times in the thread, as also reiterated multiple times further in the thread, but degenerates gonna degenerate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

xthetenth

Golden Member
Oct 14, 2014
1,800
529
106
Claiming that the right has never fought for equal rights of women or minorities is false. Anyone with a clue would know this. There are countless examples. Little thing about slavery and the civil war comes to mind.

Yeah, the right wing sure is centered on the northeast, and certainly hasn't become centered in the heart of treason. The right wing certainly isn't the party that frequently uses the battle standard of the traitors who fought to preserve slavery. You do not get to use the legacy of the people who fought and died to undo some of the evil of your ideological forbears to excuse your behavior.

Funny how threatening a lawsuit causes people to "clarify" their statements. Bill O'Reilly can learn a thing or two from the younger Hannity.

Yeah, it really puts it down to whoever has the money to keep up legal action and risk the loss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

agent00f

Lifer
Jun 9, 2016
12,203
1,243
86
Yeah, the right wing sure is centered on the northeast, and certainly hasn't become centered in the heart of treason. The right wing certainly isn't the party that frequently uses the battle standard of the traitors who fought to preserve slavery. You do not get to use the legacy of the people who fought and died to undo some of the evil of your ideological forbears to excuse your behavior.



Yeah, it really puts it down to whoever has the money to keep up legal action and risk the loss.

Degenerates like to pretend Republicans were the "right wing" back in the day. Notice none of his peers batted an eye at such dishonesty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie