(Confirmed) Vote Tampering In North Carolina

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
I feel like from the text of the article they are saying pretty clearly they won't.
I'm going with they will until they don't, but then "reconciliation" may raise its ugly head and that is not acceptable these days.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,992
31,550
146
Why haven't the brainless MAGA zealots swarmed into this thread to defend these treacherous acts?
 

DrDoug

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2014
3,580
1,629
136
Seems like the Republican congressional candidate sought out the unscrupulous individual now at the center of the allegations, despite warnings that he was a shady character:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...06139e540e5_story.html?utm_term=.83a80ea15bca

Unscrupulous?

Walter McDuffie, the chairman of the Bladen County Republican Party, told The Washington Post that he warned the Harris campaign about Dowless’s criminal record, which includes felony convictions for fraud and perjury and a misdemeanor charge for passing a worthless check in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Change the word "warned" to "told" and it sounds like he was giving Harris a job recommendation for a fine conservative activist.
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
Now this smacks of something not quite kosher:

Days before North Carolina’s board of elections could vote to call a new race between Harris and Democrat Dan McCready in the state’s disputed 9th Congressional District, Republican lawmakers passed a bill requiring a new primary when the board rules a campaign must be run over again. That would give Republican voters the ability to sideline Harris in a special election, after accusations of illegal collection and manipulation of absentee ballots by McCrae Dowless, an operative hired by Harris campaign consultants.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...-north-carolina-special/ar-BBQVKq4?li=BBnbfcQ

Damn, NC Repubs, like most Repubs it seems these days, have no shame.
 

DrDoug

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2014
3,580
1,629
136
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie
Dec 10, 2005
29,617
15,178
136
Yet, when it comes to all other voting rules we get there "too close to the election, must not change now."
Always great when the status quo is exclusionary and they justify it as "too late to do anything now," knowing that the unfairness of the system will perpetuate the unfair status quo.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,729
48,545
136
Earth to Paul LePage: this is what it looks like when someone tries to steal an election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lsd

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,256
136
Can someone explain why the court dismissed the election board? I read a NYT article that was pretty long, but never really said why.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
Can someone explain why the court dismissed the election board? I read a NYT article that was pretty long, but never really said why.

The election board was only mandated to exist until Jan 1, iirc. They wanted to extend their tenure as did the governor, but the court ruled there was no basis to do so. The GOP legislature then changed the law so that the governor couldn't appoint a new board until Feb 1, taking the heat off for awhile. They also made it so that a new election would also have a new primary, paving the way for Harris to be replaced by another Repub in the general election, somebody who doesn't bear the taint of this imbroglio.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/28/poli...emergency-petition-results-certify/index.html
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zorba and lsd

esquared

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 8, 2000
25,382
6,397
146
The election board was only mandated to exist until Jan 1, iirc. They wanted to extend their tenure as did the governor, but the court ruled there was no basis to do so. The GOP legislature then changed the law so that the governor couldn't appoint a new board until Feb 1, taking the heat off for awhile. They also made it so that a new election would also have a new primary, paving the way for Harris to be replaced by another Repub in the general election, somebody who doesn't bear the taint of this imbroglio.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/28/poli...emergency-petition-results-certify/index.html
^^^ bolded:
So they made this so they get to have a mulligan because their dirty guy got caught?

How can that even be legal? Is someone with any integrity looking to file a lawsuit about that redo with another candidate?
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
16,128
8,718
136
Hey, if getting caught red handed messing with the right to vote is of less importance than hanging on to power any and every way possible, then there's nothing, absolutely nothing stopping the the GOP from ripping the Constitution and Bill of Rights to shreds because at some time in the near future, it's going to be the only card the Repubs will have left to play.

I mean, they're already doing some really amazing things dancing around the edges of legality and occasionally stepping over it like what happened in North Carolina, so this trip down the road to fascism is the only logical course of action for the party if they feel they absolutely must stay in power or cease to exist.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,992
31,550
146
^^^ bolded:
So they made this so they get to have a mulligan because their dirty guy got caught?

How can that even be legal? Is someone with any integrity looking to file a lawsuit about that redo with another candidate?

Of course it's not legal.



....oh yeah, remember when we needed to repeal half of the Voting Rights Act because "it wasn't needed?" lol--this is that test--and what the GOP had been salivating for.

Let's see if the law steps in and beats my redneck brethren into the curb for this malfeasance. I won't hold my breath...
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,862
6,396
126
Of course it's not legal.



....oh yeah, remember when we needed to repeal half of the Voting Rights Act because "it wasn't needed?" lol--this is that test--and what the GOP had been salivating for.

Let's see if the law steps in and beats my redneck brethren into the curb for this malfeasance. I won't hold my breath...

It's almost as if that nearly everytime a major longstanding Regulation is nullified, the original effect that the Regulation was made to address, mysteriously returns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dank69

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,915
4,958
136
And if Republicans get away with it, it will become a model for the country. By the time this blows up for joe blow voter, it won't matter. Minority rule will be secured.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,246
55,794
136
It’s odd that conservatives who claimed to be so very threatened by voter fraud seem so quiet and uninterested in a large and obvious election fraud campaign that appears to have stolen a seat from the rightful winner.

Gee, I wonder why. Clearly it couldn’t be that conservatives never cared about fraud to begin with so what is left?
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,521
20,157
146
So, the first and only verifiable, provable case of widespread voter fraud and an ACTUAL conspiracy to fix an election in decades and it's not the dems. Not illegals. Not the illiminutty.

It's the fucking Republicans.

Accuse your opponent of that which you are doing.