Brainonska511
Lifer
- Dec 10, 2005
- 28,005
- 12,579
- 136
A jury hasn't ruled on it yet, so I can't tell.Do you think your bias smells better than mine?
A jury hasn't ruled on it yet, so I can't tell.Do you think your bias smells better than mine?
You never fail to live down to your name.Colbert sucked at entertainment, makes no difference what his political preferences were.
I'd rather watch paint dry, grass grow, etc, he was never anything other than a placeholder because they couldn't find a better host.
It's amusing when people try to equate this to a conspiracy when it's just terrible tv that wasn't self sustaining because no sane person would watch it instead of, again, paint drying, or grass growing.
Bye bye Colbert. I never missed you. I never give a fsck so just go away so late night has a chance of something worth watching. Comedy can be offensive at times, but it wasn't funny so double fail.
No argument = patheticYou never fail to live down to your name.
No argument = pathetic
Why bother? You should have better things to do. Triple fail if you don't.
#cantfixstupid
At the same time, I have better things to do than pretend that an argument in this forum matters, so if you want to rant and pretend it's a victory, I'm fine with that.
I just want to say I love how every single line in this post just reeks of projection. You poor bastard.No argument = pathetic
Why bother? You should have better things to do. Triple fail if you don't.
#cantfixstupid
At the same time, I have better things to do than pretend that an argument in this forum matters, so if you want to rant and pretend it's a victory, I'm fine with that.
We do know how much you love your dried paint, those chips are fucking delicious, aren't they? You gobbled them down by the handful as a youth, I'll betcha.Colbert sucked at entertainment, makes no difference what his political preferences were.
I'd rather watch paint dry, grass grow, etc, he was never anything other than a placeholder because they couldn't find a better host.
It's amusing when people try to equate this to a conspiracy when it's just terrible tv that wasn't self sustaining because no sane person would watch it instead of, again, paint drying, or grass growing.
Bye bye Colbert. I never missed you. I never give a fsck so just go away so late night has a chance of something worth watching. Comedy can be offensive at times, but it wasn't funny so double fail.
Carson kept his job for 30 years. Colbert didn't quite make it that far. What we learn from this is that having a small audience and not making a profit along with annoying half of your possible audience isn't a winning strategy.You are right. He is trash with only winning 10 Emmys
Edit
Johnny Carson who is probably considered one for the greatest late night host only had 6 emmys
You need to adjust your humor
You do realize he has the highest ratings of all the late night shows right?Carson kept his job for 30 years. Colbert didn't quite make it that far. What we learn from this is that having a small audience and not making a profit along with annoying half of your possible audience isn't a winning strategy.
Maybe the next guy will have a better format and better writers.
You do realize he has the highest ratings of all the late night shows right?
The larger issue is a general decline in viewership of the the traditional networks.
Carson kept his job for 30 years. Colbert didn't quite make it that far. What we learn from this is that having a small audience and not making a profit along with annoying half of your possible audience isn't a winning strategy.
Maybe the next guy will have a better format and better writers.
In this context, the why doesn't matter. The show couldn't produce enough advertising dollars to be profitable. That's the entire story. Expenses exceeded revenue.You do realize he has the highest ratings of all the late night shows right?
The larger issue is a general decline in viewership of the the traditional networks.
No, no, it's obviously an apples to apples comparison with someone that started out before the advent of cable television and then streaming came along.You do realize he has the highest ratings of all the late night shows right?
The larger issue is a general decline in viewership of the the traditional networks.
Well, you see, when a corporation says a thing you agree with, then it's a self-evident truth. When they say something you don't agree with, then it's a ploy to deceive you.How can we possibly know the revenue and costs of the show? I mean, without a trial and verdict, it's not official.
Highest rating in his time slot, yes, but Gutfield has way more viewers, on cable (vs network) TV no less. Tells you where the country's at right now.You do realize he has the highest ratings of all the late night shows right?
The larger issue is a general decline in viewership of the the traditional networks.
A Republican should know what to do in that situation. Cut the budget! I have several ideas.In this context, the why doesn't matter. The show couldn't produce enough advertising dollars to be profitable. That's the entire story. Expenses exceeded revenue.
You do realize he has the highest ratings of all the late night shows right?
The larger issue is a general decline in viewership of the the traditional networks.
O'Reilly with downs syndrome. So the tards thinks he's funny.I have no idea who Gutfield is.