manufactured rage? they were told to stop because the CG didn't know if they had requisite safety material on board.. unless you want people sucking up oil without any means to suppress flames..
I mean really, are you people this fucking retarded? shut up and find a better reason already
Actually if the equipment was missing, the coast guard should have loaned them the needed gear to keep them working. This is just being stupid.
if they sit idle for more then 3-4 days then yeah you can bitch until then no rage needed.
Those barges should not have stopped. The coast guard should have given an estimate of what they needed to be safe so those supplies could be procured.
The coast guard should be doing everything it can at this point to assist, not put up roadblocks.
So who do you blame for the oil leak, BP or Obama?
Instead of bitching about the POTUS not "doing his job" with this disaster, maybe you guys need to vent your anger at why you think the job is not being done right. So instead of flying off the handle with no information and coming up with moron reasoning, please look at the National Incident Command web site so you dolts can realize that what is being done right now is following Federal Law in the way the disaster is being handled. Incident command was established within minutes after the explosion. You can read up on how things are dealt with from there.
http://www.nimsonline.com/
and before you think I'm a partisan hack, Bush Jr. enacted the NIMS department and I think this was a brilliant idea.
The CG and EPA really need to back off of enforcement of minutia during what amounts to be a state of emergency. I don't blame Obama entirely for this, it's these folks jobs to do stuff like this, but Obama needs make it clear they need to back off. Let folks take responsibility for their own safety, and if they're willing, they're own part in the cleanup.
Where does it talk about what is being done about the oil spill on that website? The last time anything was added to that site was Feb 3. There isn't even a mention of an oil spill.
As a matter of fact, the FEMA website (parent of NIMS) doesn't have jack SHIT about the oil spill, other than a link to a separate website where you can file a claim for damages against BP. Nothing about response, nothing about efforts to stop it, nothing about cleaning it up, NOTHING. it isn't even listed in the "declared emergencies/disasters" on FEMA's website.
So tell me again what your stupid point was?
The CG and EPA are not used to dealing with this type of massive problem and are probably trying to decide what to enforce and not enforce in this case. I'm sure that's why this incident occurred. They ok'ed it first then had second thoughts about safety then ok'ed it again. Tha't also why the locals are having to come up with unique solutions like this one with the vacuum barges.
manufactured rage? they were told to stop because the CG didn't know if they had requisite safety material on board.. unless you want people sucking up oil without any means to suppress flames..
I mean really, are you people this fucking retarded? shut up and find a better reason already
So who do you blame for the oil leak, BP or Obama?
Obviously I have wasted my time since you couldn't even understand what I presented here in the first place.
You got that right, at least.I'm done.
manufactured rage? they were told to stop because the CG didn't know if they had requisite safety material on board.. unless you want people sucking up oil without any means to suppress flames..
I mean really, are you people this fucking retarded? shut up and find a better reason already
Really? They cant send somebody out there to verify this? Why the need to contact the owner? This is exactly the type of malaise we get from govt. And why many of us dont trust it to get anything meaningful done. So while the Coastguard waits for a return phone call. The oil just piles up.
btw this sounds like a political ploy. Kind of like when buddies of the health inspector who happen to own a restaurant gets their buddy to harass the hell out of the competition with constant inspection and frivelous complaints. In this case jindahl is making Obama look like the fool he is. So here comes the coastguard to harass the states attempts to fix the situation.
I don't think you do either, quite honestly. The site you gave us has *zero* information regarding what is going on... unless you meant for us to search through the site, sign up for incident management classes, attend those classes, then come back and post... would we then be qualified to criticize the non-leader in charge of our country and his non-response to this massive incident?
You got that right, at least.
Hey, I'll even do you this one... please explain, based on the content of that site, what I need to know and why it affects what is going on, and how it changes my initial argument. If you make a compelling case, I will change my mind.
Hey hey hey, it's always the Democrats fault even when Republicans had full control for 6 years.
I'm not asking you to completely change your argument. What I am asking is to look at the larger picture and see how this disaster developed and how things are orchestrated. My point of all this is to show you that we actually have a procedure set by law. I'm not saying this is the best procedure out there and it is possible because of this event that things will need to be changed but for this disaster we are following that procedure. I think this article is a good example of how NIMS is enacted but it brings up the possibility that it may not be enough for something like this event.
http://cgblog.org/2010/06/12/will-icsnims-have-to-be-rewritten-after-deepwater-horizon/
