Chuck Rangel will introduce draft legislation

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Dean

Platinum Member
Oct 10, 1999
2,757
0
76
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Jesus H. Christ . . in the last 40 years we've succedded in breeding a nation comprised of cowards and draft-dodgers.

Almost everyone would be willing to fight to defend their Country. Almost nobody would volunteer to fight in a trumped up, pointless invasion only to be used as a pawn.



 
Aug 1, 2006
1,308
0
0
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Originally posted by: Paddington
The Republicans should publicize this heavily next election cycle. We'll see how middle America likes the idea of "Democrats want to draft your sons/daughters to war!"


Yeah - exactaly the type of target that the Republicans thrive on.

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Rangel">Charlie Rangel, a Veteran of the US Army with 4+ years of service during the Korean War.
Purple Heart, Bronze Star recipiant for his duty to his country.</a>

Tell me about how much service to the nation the typical GOP yes-man has, you go girly-man.

haha. SMMMMMMMACK! :laugh:
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
None of this is new. Rangle has tried to introduce this legislation since the Iraq War began. Now that the Dems are in charge he can at least get it out of committee. I'm sure in his mind it's a backward slap at the Bush administration's handling of Iraq.

Nothing will come of it as no politician in his right mind would vote for it if there was a chance that it might actually pass.

Why would it suddenly make it out of committee? Having controls of Congress makes no guarantee getting something out of committee.
 
Aug 1, 2006
1,308
0
0
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
None of this is new. Rangle has tried to introduce this legislation since the Iraq War began. Now that the Dems are in charge he can at least get it out of committee. I'm sure in his mind it's a backward slap at the Bush administration's handling of Iraq.

Nothing will come of it as no politician in his right mind would vote for it if there was a chance that it might actually pass.

You weren't one of the "the Dems will never ever win they will continue to be beaten by us good god fearin sunsabitches reupublicans for the naxt twanty yeeers." were you? Because those guys think the same way, negatively. They were right though, weren't they? Whooops! Hell froze over I guess! :laugh:
 

OrganizedChaos

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2002
4,524
0
0
if it looks like were going to get a draft i'm enlisting as fast as i can first. i don't wanna end up sharing a foxhole with someone who dosen't wanna be there.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,614
15,006
146
I have no problem with requiring a 2 or 3 year obligation for the young men & women in our country, as long as you do away with the deferments for college students and the rich kids. Make EVERY able-bodies person do their time. Doesn't have to be in the armed services, there are lots of ways to serve this country without ever picking up a weapon. National Health Service, Peace Corps, etc. Likr Cap'n Kirk, I didn't wait to be drafted, I enlisted...with a guarantee to go to Vietnam as a rifleman in a USMC rifle company...I had lots of friends who were drafted, and ended up with crappy jobs in the military...At least I got my choice of jobs by enlisting.
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
Young P&N chickenhawk republicans/libertarians: FORWARD......MARCH!

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Oh yeah, and say hi to mohammed and his sword of slicing idiots who support optional wars +2
 
Aug 1, 2006
1,308
0
0
Originally posted by: BoomerD
I have no problem with requiring a 2 or 3 year obligation for the young men & women in our country, as long as you do away with the deferments for college students and the rich kids. Make EVERY able-bodies person do their time. Doesn't have to be in the armed services, there are lots of ways to serve this country without ever picking up a weapon. National Health Service, Peace Corps, etc. Likr Cap'n Kirk, I didn't wait to be drafted, I enlisted...with a guarantee to go to Vietnam as a rifleman in a USMC rifle company...I had lots of friends who were drafted, and ended up with crappy jobs in the military...At least I got my choice of jobs by enlisting.

Complete agreement, and I salute you for your service.
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Originally posted by: International Machine Consortium
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
None of this is new. Rangle has tried to introduce this legislation since the Iraq War began. Now that the Dems are in charge he can at least get it out of committee. I'm sure in his mind it's a backward slap at the Bush administration's handling of Iraq.

Nothing will come of it as no politician in his right mind would vote for it if there was a chance that it might actually pass.

You weren't one of the "the Dems will never ever win they will continue to be beaten by us good god fearin sunsabitches reupublicans for the naxt twanty yeeers." were you? Because those guys think the same way, negatively. They were right though, weren't they? Whooops! Hell froze over I guess! :laugh:

I'm not sure what that has to do with anything.

And no, I never said anything like that this election cycle. Far from it. I was in the camp that said there was no way the Dems should lose.
 
Aug 1, 2006
1,308
0
0
It has to do with the idea that sanguine fools are often wrong.

You may have said that "this election cycle" (sorry I don't hang on your every word) but there was a little voice in your head praying it wouldn't go that way. ;)
 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,390
29
91
Originally posted by: her209
Anyone who is not for the draft should be immediately sent to Gitmo as traitors of the United States.

The face of the liberati freedom fighter!



 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Originally posted by: International Machine Consortium
It has to do with the idea that sanguine fools are often wrong.

You may have said that "this election cycle" (sorry I don't hang on your every word) but there was a little voice in your head praying it wouldn't go that way. ;)
Why do you have to be such a jack ass about everything? What are you, 12?

I'm sorry that I don't conform to how you wish reality would line up. The Rs deserved what they got. I didn't pray/wish/hope/secretly yen for anything. I looked at the numbers and accepted them for what they were.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: International Machine Consortium
It has to do with the idea that sanguine fools are often wrong.

You may have said that "this election cycle" (sorry I don't hang on your every word) but there was a little voice in your head praying it wouldn't go that way. ;)
Why do you have to be such a jack ass about everything? What are you, 12?

I'm sorry that I don't conform to how you wish reality would line up. The Rs deserved what they got. I didn't pray/wish/hope/secretly yen for anything.

I looked at the numbers and accepted them for what they were.

Your posts say otherwise. :laugh:
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: International Machine Consortium
It has to do with the idea that sanguine fools are often wrong.

You may have said that "this election cycle" (sorry I don't hang on your every word) but there was a little voice in your head praying it wouldn't go that way. ;)
Why do you have to be such a jack ass about everything? What are you, 12?

I'm sorry that I don't conform to how you wish reality would line up. The Rs deserved what they got. I didn't pray/wish/hope/secretly yen for anything.

I looked at the numbers and accepted them for what they were.

Your posts say otherwise. :laugh:
Put up or shut up. Link it big boy.

My political leanings are no secret and I made my case for why I wanted the Rs to keep the majority. There was no secret wishing on my part for a result other than what was inevitable and at no time did I ever say that the Rs would keep the majority. So if you can prove it go ahead. Otherwise STFU.
 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,390
29
91
Originally posted by: her209
Freedom is not free.

Two to three years of indentured servitude = Freedom.

The liberati crack me up sometimes. Freedom means nothing to you.....unless you're complaining about some conservative supposedly taking it away from you.

LOL, I wonder how many here would support this if it didn't just apply to the "young", and required every single citizens full time participation for 3 years immediately folling its passage into law. But then again, this is a socialists wet dream.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
The draft is completely unnecessary unless you expect to have to use a huge standing army for agression. I think the Reps should have been kicked in the nuts if they wanted a huge expensive standing army in a world were it's not needed. Since it seems that some Dems want it, I have a well aimed blow standing by for them.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Originally posted by: Corn
Originally posted by: her209
Freedom is not free.
Two to three years of indentured servitude = Freedom.

The liberati crack me up sometimes. Freedom means nothing to you.....unless you're complaining about some conservative supposedly taking it away from you.

LOL, I wonder how many here would support this if it didn't just apply to the "young", and required every single citizens full time participation for 3 years immediately folling its passage into law. But then again, this is a socialists wet dream.
Certainly you aren't scared of the terrorists, are you? Besides, what's more honorable than giving your life in the name of freedom, right?
 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,390
29
91
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: Corn
Originally posted by: her209
Freedom is not free.
Two to three years of indentured servitude = Freedom.

The liberati crack me up sometimes. Freedom means nothing to you.....unless you're complaining about some conservative supposedly taking it away from you.

LOL, I wonder how many here would support this if it didn't just apply to the "young", and required every single citizens full time participation for 3 years immediately folling its passage into law. But then again, this is a socialists wet dream.
Certainly you aren't scared of the terrorists, are you? Besides, what's more honorable than giving your life in the name of freedom, right?

I assume you are, what, 12 years old?
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Originally posted by: Corn
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: Corn
Originally posted by: her209
Freedom is not free.
Two to three years of indentured servitude = Freedom.

The liberati crack me up sometimes. Freedom means nothing to you.....unless you're complaining about some conservative supposedly taking it away from you.

LOL, I wonder how many here would support this if it didn't just apply to the "young", and required every single citizens full time participation for 3 years immediately folling its passage into law. But then again, this is a socialists wet dream.
Certainly you aren't scared of the terrorists, are you? Besides, what's more honorable than giving your life in the name of freedom, right?

I assume you are, what, 12 years old?

Can I assume you support the Iraq operation, and are of age to serve?

 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,390
29
91
Originally posted by: UberNeuman
Originally posted by: Corn
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: Corn
Originally posted by: her209
Freedom is not free.
Two to three years of indentured servitude = Freedom.

The liberati crack me up sometimes. Freedom means nothing to you.....unless you're complaining about some conservative supposedly taking it away from you.

LOL, I wonder how many here would support this if it didn't just apply to the "young", and required every single citizens full time participation for 3 years immediately folling its passage into law. But then again, this is a socialists wet dream.
Certainly you aren't scared of the terrorists, are you? Besides, what's more honorable than giving your life in the name of freedom, right?

I assume you are, what, 12 years old?

Can I assume you support the Iraq operation, and are of age to serve?

I assume you support law and order.....can I assume you are a policeman? Silly liberati.
 

Vaktathi

Member
Feb 4, 2006
119
0
76
Just thought I'd interject in here right quick.

There is a reason the US no longer has a draft.

Conscript soldiers to not work well in anything other than wars of national survival. They don't work out well for conflicts which are seen as optional or unpopular. Why spend $30k training and equipping someone who doesnt want to be somewhere, doesnt want to be involved, and may not have the personality or physical profile to be an efficient soldier and may be nothing but a drag to the rest of their unit? Why inundate a proffesional, highly motivated force with people who look at their service as equivalent to prison time? Furthermore, what happens when said dissaffected soldiers have access to multimillion (or billion) dollar machinery?

If the US were under invasion I'd say a draft is a good idea, if we were involved in a huge regional conflict (like Cold War style Warsaw Pact VS Nato showdown in Europe) I'd say a draft may be a good idea.

For a conflict like Iraq, or any "optional" conflict (that being one which we choose to engage in, rather than being forced into), a draft is a very bad idea.