Jaskalas
Lifer
- Jun 23, 2004
- 36,316
- 10,629
- 136
Originally posted by: blackllotus
Originally posted by: Corn
But then again, this is a socialists wet dream.
Except... its not
You?re right, it?s not socialism. This stinks of communism.
Originally posted by: blackllotus
Originally posted by: Corn
But then again, this is a socialists wet dream.
Except... its not
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
I wasn't drafted, I joined on my own, but many of my friends did go into the military through the draft.
I think it's good to have a draft because it requires the country's population as a whole to become invested
into the psychological responsibility of service to their country, and taking the assocciated responsibility
of entering into a war and it's ensuing consequences - something that the GOP Leadership never has had to face.
Originally posted by: her209
A culture of entitlement!Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Jesus H. Christ . . in the last 40 years we've succedded in breeding a nation comprised of cowards and draft-dodgers.
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: Termagant
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: Termagant
Originally posted by: her209
A culture of entitlement!Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Jesus H. Christ . . in the last 40 years we've succedded in breeding a nation comprised of cowards and draft-dodgers.
Why do the Republicans hate America?
Before anyone says "an all volunteer military is better," this legislation is for national service, i.e. Peace Corp, Teach for America, military, etc. So people people can still volunteer for the military if they don't want to serve in something else.
Has anyone here ever heard of the 13th Amendment?
The Constitution is just a piece of paper! And we don't live in some Libertarian utopia where you can mooch of the government and never pay the piper.
So your solution is to, quite literally, reintegrate general involuntary servitude into American culture?
Over my rotting corpse.
Originally posted by: Paddington
The Republicans should publicize this heavily next election cycle. We'll see how middle America likes the idea of "Democrats want to draft your sons/daughters to war!"
You're completely fscking stupid, you know that?Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Young P&N chickenhawk republicans/libertarians: FORWARD......MARCH!
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Oh yeah, and say hi to mohammed and his sword of slicing idiots who support optional wars +2
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
I wasn't drafted, I joined on my own, but many of my friends did go into the military through the draft.
I think it's good to have a draft because it requires the country's population as a whole to become invested
into the psychological responsibility of service to their country, and taking the assocciated responsibility
of entering into a war and it's ensuing consequences - something that the GOP Leadership never has had to face.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
You're completely fscking stupid, you know that?Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Young P&N chickenhawk republicans/libertarians: FORWARD......MARCH!
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Oh yeah, and say hi to mohammed and his sword of slicing idiots who support optional wars +2
Originally posted by: mc00
I refuse to fight a war I don't support
.
I am sure there are people who would not be willing to go to war for their country, and one might be justified in calling them cowards. However, I think most people would simply rather not be forced into a war they do not believe in, which is where the main opposition to the draft comes from.Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
a culture of cowards!!!Originally posted by: her209
A culture of entitlement!Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Jesus H. Christ . . in the last 40 years we've succedded in breeding a nation comprised of cowards and draft-dodgers.
They want the freedom, but not the sacrifice!!
I've served you goddam fvcking moron. I enlisted and served in the early 90s. That's more than you anybody can say for a sniveling little coward like you, content to criticize from behind a keyboard. Have you ever volunteered to serve in anything? Peace corp? Military? Soup kitchen? Or are you just a chicken sh1t loser that isn't willing to put your money where your mouth is. My bet is on chicken sh1t loser, you haven't got the balls to actually take any action. I'm sure the closest you've ever come to testicles is when you peek at the boys in the locker room.Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Originally posted by: BoberFett
You're completely fscking stupid, you know that?Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Young P&N chickenhawk republicans/libertarians: FORWARD......MARCH!
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Oh yeah, and say hi to mohammed and his sword of slicing idiots who support optional wars +2
When you shipping out tough guy? :lips:
Like DICK "5 Deferment" Cheney?Originally posted by: KK
maybe this will knock those liberal college preps back into reality. Ah, they'd probably run to canada anyways.
Originally posted by: Perknose
I would.Originally posted by: Corn
LOL, I wonder how many here would support this if it didn't just apply to the "young", and required every single citizens full time participation for 3 years immediately folling its passage into law. But then again, this is a socialists wet dream.
And . . . socialists wet dream my ass, Tom. :|
Boo, there's a socialist under your bed.
I fully support asking every American, no exceptions, to serve their country, to give back to the United States of America with the one thing that levels us all, two years out of their own life in service, military or other.
Not pointing to you, Tom, but I hate fvcking chickhawks like 5 deferment Cheney and champagne division Bush.
How do you feel about them?
Originally posted by: Mail5398
It is a volunteer force. No one makes you sign up. The idea that it is only the uneducated has been disproven. Are you saying that only democrats serve in the military?
Originally posted by: Mail5398
Rangel, who appeared on Face the Nation this morning, reinforced his idea of a draft. Young people should be forced to give up a couple years of their life to serve the U.S. government. Okay, how many of you guys are fired up and ready to go?
Originally posted by: Perknose
I would.Originally posted by: Corn
LOL, I wonder how many here would support this if it didn't just apply to the "young", and required every single citizens full time participation for 3 years immediately folling its passage into law. But then again, this is a socialists wet dream.
And . . . socialists wet dream my ass, Tom. :|
Boo, there's a socialist under your bed.
I fully support asking every American, no exceptions, to serve their country, to give back to the United States of America with the one thing that levels us all, two years out of their own life in service, military or other.
Not pointing to you, Tom, but I hate fvcking chickhawks like 5 deferment Cheney and champagne division Bush.
How do you feel about them?
Finally! The children of the wealthy and priveleged will have to serve in Iraq! I wonder how Bush's true believers will feel about the war then?Chuck Rangel will introduce draft legislation
BaliBabyDoc: In fact, the only place where college-educated, upper-middle class servicepeople are well represented is amongst the officers. And again . . . they aren't the ones dying in Iraq.
Among both Army soldiers and marines, enlisted personnel have a 40 percent higher mortality rate than officers. The exception is Army and Marine Corps lieutenants - junior officers who typically lead combat patrols and who have a markedly higher mortality rate than all soldiers and marines.
Originally posted by: AndrewR
My God, institute the draft and kill the military. It's quite simple, really. The US military today is the most professional and capable military force ever fielded in the history of the world. The reason it is that way is because we have an all-volunteer force that WANTS to be in uniform and WANTS to perform to the highest level possible. Since it is smaller, it can be trained to a very high level.
Institute a draft, and you have a much larger group of recruits, yes, but also an enormous percentage of them who DO NOT WANT to be there and who will respond to training poorly and will in all likelihood perform to a low level because of a lack of motivation. Even IF they do perform well, they will not be trained to the same level because we cannot maintain the current high standards of training while pipelining enormous numbers of conscripts.
The end result will be a dilution of talent, an increase in body counts, a VAST increase in required expenditures for every service provided by the military (medical, legal, logistics, training, housing, etc.), and an overall decrease in the usefulness of the US military.
What's amusing is that people here are blaming the Republicans for not serving, yet the military as a whole is somewhere around 80% Republican -- who isn't serving again? The liberal elites from Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, and the like are flocking to the military, right? They lean which way in the political spectrum?
Ok, last item. Roll call here: Which of the following (supporters of the draft, from above) served in the military?
1) conjur
2) dmcowen674
3) d3n
4) her209
5) Termagant
6) International Machine Consortium
7) Steeplerot
8) BaliBabyDoc
9) Perknose
BaliBabyDoc: In fact, the only place where college-educated, upper-middle class servicepeople are well represented is amongst the officers. And again . . . they aren't the ones dying in Iraq.
Here's a list of alumni just from my alma mater who have been killed so far in OIF/OEF. One was my classmate; I knew another quite well from my time at VMI; and two I knew of but did not know personally. Another classmate of mine hit an IED and had his Humvee flipped but fortunately did not suffer any serious injuries. STFU about officers not being killed, you idiot.
Mr. Gregory Wright '95
Capt. Lowell T. Miller '93
Capt. James C. Edge '96
Capt. Luke C. Wullenwaber '02
Major Paul R. Syverson '96
Sergeant Ryan E. Doltz '00
Lieutenant Joshua C. Hurley '01
Capt. John Robert Teal '94
Lieutenant Commander David Lucian Williams '91
Mr. Charles W. Mathers '62
Here's a quote for you from the Christian Science Monitor:Among both Army soldiers and marines, enlisted personnel have a 40 percent higher mortality rate than officers. The exception is Army and Marine Corps lieutenants - junior officers who typically lead combat patrols and who have a markedly higher mortality rate than all soldiers and marines.
