Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Originally posted by: eits
...but i know that stress can cause trigger points and can be relieved by acupuncture...
Whoa.....
you disagree?
I happen to follow the literature on acupuncture quite closely and so far every single credible study that has ever been performed to test acupuncture for any kind of ailment known to man has shown a negative (no better than placebo) effect. Every. Single. One. So yeah, I disagree a little.
i doubt that.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...tPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
there are a few other studies out there that draw correlations between acupuncture and stress reduction as well as trigger point therapy.
acupuncture is in the same boat as all other alternative health cares... they lack major funding for lots of meaningful studies. you read research? well, then, you should know as well as i do that research is heavily influenced by bias and can practically say whatever you want it to. you could find a bunch of research studies that tell you alcohol is good for you... but is it? no... it doesn't even matter what dosage (still won't keep me from drinking it, though
😉).
your problem is that you're FAR too reliant on the allopathic model... probably because you're under the impression that it's more scientific or somehow more correct. however, there are some codes out there in human anatomy/physiology and life in general that have yet to be cracked.
also, how can you apply a medical standard to something that doesn't follow the same mold of medicine?
you can deny actual treatment of patients due to chiropractic or acupuncture all you want... that doesn't mean it's placebo. most people who've seen a chiropractor or acupuncturist did so because they've tried the medical route and it failed them. they didn't even get a placebo effect through them. somehow, you think that alternative medicine would somehow cause a placebo effect when medicine couldn't produce one? even with what you would consider to be prudent, valid, and effective treatment?
sorry, man, but you're being naive and far too trusting of a field of health care that is practically dictated and dominated by a money-making behemoth (big pharma). they have the fda and nih by the sac. most of the studies out there are heavily biased towards creating new medications and the effectiveness of medications for newly created diseases. for every one drug you hear about on the news where the research was tampered with in order to downplay side-effects and boost effectiveness, i would venture to say that there are 10 you don't hear about.
there are chiropractic studies out there that pit chiropractic adjustment against sham chiropractic adjustments and, every time, chiropractic actually produces when the placebo adjustments could not. they do the same thing with acupuncture.