nehalem256
Lifer
- Apr 13, 2012
- 15,669
- 8
- 0
From what I gather a large part of Taiwan consider themselves to be a part of China
Well duh. They consider themselves the rightful ruler of all China.
From what I gather a large part of Taiwan consider themselves to be a part of China
Because apparently all small countries want to be annexed by neighboring superpowers
We've never actually been defeated in a conventional war. We've been fought to draws by Great Britain (War of 1812) and China (Korea) and we've been defeated in guerrilla warfare (Vietnam), but never defeated in a conventional war. Iraq we won easily in a conventional war. Afghanistan we won easily in a combination war, mostly guerrilla warfare but backing the Northern Alliance with our air power in some pretty conventional battles. In conventional wars and battles, our military is virtually unbeatable.Which explains our big time success in Iraq and Afghanistan right?
Get a clue. US gets beat in any unconventional war. And it will be low level unconventional with nukes on the table where any slight they could go off.
Actually I don't think US would do a damn thing about Taiwan when it comes down to it. Too risky. Like Chimera. Like East Ukraine if Russia pushed issue.
Some sanctions thats about it.
Carry on with chest beating though. Have to justify spending 700 billion on a failed force/jobs program somehow.
I don't even mind a federal jobs program. It's the unproductive nature of .mils I have a problem with.
Ah, good thing Canada is the second largest country in the world
From what I gather a large part of Taiwan consider themselves to be a part of China
wait--are you counting the polar bears and salmon?
So how many times have you been in Taiwan? In all the times I've worked in Taiwan I never heard anyone say they wanted their country to be part of China. Though they were afraid that China would try to take control of their country.
Attacks against Americans. Sure, we can't stop China from hitting Taiwan with short range missiles, but if you think that has any bearing on America being able to fight China in a war, you're not particularly bright.I was just trying to add some perspective to
'We can detect any launches and deal with them long before that happens."
From what I gather a large part of Taiwan consider themselves to be a part of China
I googled it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_area
You worked in Lloyd too, and somehow your co workers convinced you of no go zones
So how many times have you been in Taiwan? In all the times I've worked in Taiwan I never heard anyone say they wanted their country to be part of China. Though they were afraid that China would try to take control of their country.
Attacks against Americans. Sure, we can't stop China from hitting Taiwan with short range missiles, but if you think that has any bearing on America being able to fight China in a war, you're not particularly bright.
I'm getting confused here, are you saying America can stop a nuclear attack?
What the hell are you talking about? The only thing I was told in Lloydminster was to keep my hands in my pockets as the union workers were known to attack anyone including other union workers they deemed to be scabbing their jobs. The second day I was there a worker was beaten badly and stuffed into the snow bank for all to see as they left the Bi-provincial Upgrader.
In the Zimmerman thread you and I went on about no go zones in Canada
I said they did not exist and you told the story about your co workers warning you to stay out of areas in Llyod
American can detect and stop an ICBM (carrying a nuclear payload launched or not) from Europe, yes. Why do you think the Cuban Missile Crisis happened? Having the ability to launch an ICBM from that distance wouldn't give us enough time to react.
Russia is a nuclear superpower. Russia has an estimated 4,500 active nuclear warheads, according to the Federation of American Scientists. Unlike North Korea or perhaps Iran, whose nuclear arsenals couldn’t inflict substantial damage, Russia could totally devastate the U.S. as well as the rest of the planet. U.S. missile defenses, assuming they even work, are not designed to stop a massive Russian strike.
However, since most nuclear weapons in the US and Russia are mounted on some form of missile, the focus for years has been how to defend against a missile attack. Despite decades of research and tens of billions of dollars of expenditures, it has proven virtually impossible to construct a defense system which can reliably detect and shoot down missiles which travel faster than a speeding bullet.
Simple defensive measures, such as employing decoys which resemble warheads, are enough to overwhelm and defeat even the latest versions of missile defense. US missile defense systems also have extremely limited capabilities in terms of the numbers of missiles which they could engage (even if they had 100% assurance of destroying each target, which they do not). A single failure of such a system would likely result in the deaths of millions of people
No, I did not. Lloydminster is a just podunk town in Canucklestan. I never had an issue anywhere in Canada in all the years I've worked there.
We've never actually been defeated in a conventional war. We've been fought to draws by Great Britain (War of 1812) and China (Korea) and we've been defeated in guerrilla warfare (Vietnam), but never defeated in a conventional war. Iraq we won easily in a conventional war. Afghanistan we won easily in a combination war, mostly guerrilla warfare but backing the Northern Alliance with our air power in some pretty conventional battles. In conventional wars and battles, our military is virtually unbeatable.
Vietnam was also a draw technically. We sign a truce with North Vietnam which left South Vietnam free.
Then after we left North Vietnam decided to prosecute a new war against SV which the US was not involved in.
Vietnam was also a draw technically. We sign a truce with North Vietnam which left South Vietnam free.
Then after we left North Vietnam decided to prosecute a new war against SV which the US was not involved in.
Calling Vietnam a draw would greatly expand the meaning of the term, to the point of "it depends on what the definition of the word 'is' is."Vietnam was also a draw technically. We sign a truce with North Vietnam which left South Vietnam free.
Then after we left North Vietnam decided to prosecute a new war against SV which the US was not involved in.
Yup. As Ho Chi Minh said, we killed ten of his for every one of ours he killed and in the end we were the ones who tired of it.so basically the US admitted defeat, asked for a break, and ran away.
Can't argue with that too much, thanks for bringing my parents over
The people who fight our wars are the poor minorities who only want a better life.
We should be ashamed of ourselves!
The US realized that there was no will by the South (government) to fight/win.so basically the US admitted defeat, asked for a break, and ran away.
Can't argue with that too much, thanks for bringing my parents over
Calling Vietnam a draw would greatly expand the meaning of the term, to the point of "it depends on what the definition of the word 'is' is."