Originally posted by: Doggiedog
Originally posted by: Schrodinger
A "fight" is mutual. If I'm at the bar and call some guy's woman a slvt, then we take it outside for a brawl thats one thing.
This video shows something on the other end of the spectrum. The large guy was attempting to inflict serious damage. He didn't look like he was going to stop until the guy hit the ground (and even then he still kept going). And the guy had nothing on him--no way to defend himself in way of size or strength.
If he had of used a gun or a knife I'm sure that the courts would have sided with him. What else could he have done? Take it? Thats absolute stupidity.
But he didn't. If the victim pulled out a knife and killed him, I'll bet he would be the one sitting in jail. Stupid? Yes. But that's the law.
Who brainwashed you? Deadly force would have been justified, I don't think he'd have had any trouble at all.
Did you see the people holding him up at the end? He took a serious beating. No question he'd have been justified in fearing for his life.
Viper GTS