• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Cats or Dogs

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
If you can have only one then it really depends on the context.

For a single person who works, a cat is almost always better. (pretty much it's cruel to a dog if you are away for 10+ hours at a time and it doesn't get to go outside to take a leak)
For a family where there's usually never more than like 6 hours or so of "nobody" being home, a dog is probably better (as long as it's a "real" dog and not some mini little toy poodle thing.)
 
I've always liked Dogs more but since I've had a cat, they are much easier to deal with. Just take out the poop, vacuum the furniture, feed them, that's it. Real easy to take care of.
 
Originally posted by: Quintox
Cats are extremely stupid and annoying. They never learn anything. I will give an example. My two roomates have cats. Both are dumb. Neither knows their names, the always scratch shit up, and they 'play' fight each other all the time. One always attacks my damn hair and scratches the hell out of me. I'm not mean to either of them. When we are eating, they jump on the table. I pick them up, put them down and they come back. So I shove them off. Still come back. A dog, if it does this, will learn if you smack it's nose and harshly say no. A cat, doesn't. Dogs also quickly learn their names, and respond. Cats don't. Dogs get very excited and happy when you come back after work/school. Cats don't, they have that stuck up nature and ignore you.

Those are the few reasons why cats are dumb. I will give on prop to cats though: they learn to use the litter box very quickly (ie. potty trained)

And like caveman said: Dogs are man's best friend for a reason. Protection, hunting, working, life saving, detect cancer, companionship, law enforcement, therapy, people assist, problem solve, etc... Cats do NONE of these, and can't.

Your friend's cats are unusually stupid.

My cat not only knows her name (and comes when I call her) she can: Open cabinets, open the lid on my fish tank, flush the toilet, she knows which button on the remote turns on the TV (she likes to watch TV), and if she could get traction on the door knob, she could open the front door herself.

My mom and sister have 3 7-mo old kittens who all know their names and they will come when called, and they know where they're not supposed to go.

My dog, on the other hand, she knows her name and how to sit, but is pretty much dumb as a brick otherwise. She can't even figure out when the crate door is unlatched. She's also covered in fleas 5 minutes after I bathe her.

Oh and my dad's cat is a semi-outdoor cat and is the most tolerant cat I've ever seen. He's 5 years old and we had to give him a bath once (the first time ever) and he never protested, squirmed or tried to claw anybody. He wasn't happy about it, but he didn't try to hurt us. Most cats won't let you get them within 10 feet of running water without chainmail gloves or losing 3 pints of blood.



Plus, there's not much that's better for cheering somebody up than a purring cat.

Originally posted by: So

Oh yeah. Dogs are totally the filthiest, way worse than pigs, cows or horses. Totally, the filthiest animals.

Pigs, horses and cows don't live in our houses.

Originally posted by: dawp
Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
Cats make good dog food

Yup, dogs LOVE cat shit like a fat kid LOVES cake.
Fixed 😉

My dog would rather root around in the cat box than eat the food in her bowl.
 
What it really boils down to is this. Which creature is most likely to evolve into an advanced and intelligent being given enough time? A feline, obviously. A feline is many millions of years more evolved towards independent and intelligent thought than a canine is.

For a dog it don't take a whole lot of intelligence to follow a pack and obey. Many insects like ants and bees also obey and follow a similar pack mentality. A dog is controlled more by instinct and hormones than free will and intelligence. A dog is obviously stupid or neurotic enough to eat your face off if you happen to pass out next to it due to medical reasons or chemical ones. A dog will also turn on the owner and attack people unprovoked and unexpectedly and injure or kill children and adults they suddenly see as a threat to their pack hierarchy. These unfortunate attacks also happen a lot more often than dog owners would like to admit, too. But it also proves the inherently dangerous situation of having a dog and thus being its pack leader. But stupid people who don?t have a clue about the hierarchal pack mentality of a dog still insist on having large dogs around their children, because they wrongly assume the dog is a lot more intelligent than it really is.

A dog is a merely a semi intelligent pack animal which is entirely dependent on robotic pack behaviors for its survival. People breed dogs for aid in controlling livestock and hunting. People also like dogs because they feel a dog will alert them to danger or frighten people or animals away from them. Dogs were bred specifically for these aggressive pack animal defensive traits, cats were not. The only way you get this level of protection from a feline, is if you successfully tame a feral one, like a tiger or a cheetah or something.

Domestic cats, on the other hand, were tamed and bred by the Egyptians supposedly. They are useful for rodent and insect control. The Egyptians also revered and respected a cats independent thought traits which displays a high intelligence that is largely not controlled by pack mentalities, but rather by a mated pair and a matriarchal hierarchy.

Many dog lovers who also have unstable emotional issues in their lives also like the fact they can subdue and dominate a dog and it will remain stupidly loyal no matter what. In fact, gruesome scientific tests done on dogs over 50 years ago proved a dog will remain loyal even while being dismembered and tortured to death by its master. Is that really loyalty or merely ingrained genetic hierarchal pack behavior?

Dumb people frequently dislike the fact a cat can?t be subdued, controlled and abused by them, and thus naturally prefer dumb dogs. But in my experience it generally seems the lower the IQ the more likely it is that someone will gravitate to dogs rather than cats.

Smarter people on the other hand, can respect a cats intelligence and independent thought and don?t seek out a pet merely to dominate it because of emotional insecurity issues. Now obviously, not every dumb person has a dog, or smart person has a cat, and some people can see the strengths and weaknesses of both and like them equally. But generally I prefer cats over dogs. And the only dogs I like are the more intelligent acting breeds.
 
Don't forget to vote in this dog biased poll for your gigantic feline overlords who like to eat and drink poochtang.
 
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
dog will find you lost in the snow.
cat will eat your face off when you thaw.

Oh really?

Dog Bite Law

The face is the most frequent target

Studies also have shown that:
Dog bites result in approximately 44,000 facial injuries in US hospitals each year. This represents between 0.5% and 1.5% of all emergency room visits
The face is the most frequent target (77% of all injures). Mail carriers are an exception where 97% involve the lower extremities.
The central target area for the face includes the lips, nose, and cheeks.


The number of victims

A survey by the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta ("CDC") concluded that dogs bite nearly 2% of the U.S. population -- more than 4.7 million people annually. (Sacks JJ, Kresnow M, Houston B. Dog bites: how big a problem? Injury Prev 1996;2:52-4.)

Almost 800,000 bites per year -- one out of every 6 -- are serious enough to require medical attention. (Weiss HB, Friedman D, Coben JH. Incidence of dog bite injuries treated in emergency departments. JAMA 1998;279:51-53.)

Dog bites send nearly 368,000 victims to hospital emergency departments per year (1,008 per day). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nonfatal Dog Bite?Related Injuries Treated in Hospital Emergency Departments ? United States, 2001, MMWR 2003;52:605-610. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report is published by the CDC.

16,476 dog bites to persons aged 16 years or greater were work related in 2001. (Ibid., Nonfatal Dog Bite?Related Injuries Treated in Hospital Emergency Departments ? United States, 2001, MMWR 2003;52:608.

Every year 2,851 letter carriers are bitten. (US Postal Service.)

Getting bitten by a dog is the fifth most frequent cause of visits to emergency rooms caused by activities common among children. Note that this comparison is limited to activities that children more or less voluntarily engage in, such as playing sports, playing with animals, etc. Dog bite injuries are not specifically set forth in Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics, Child Injury and Mortality, pp. 36, 37, 136 and 137, which states that the leading causes of emergency room visits overall are falls, being struck by or against an object, natural or environmental causes, poisening, being cut or pierced, and motor vehicle accident.

An American has a one in 50 chance of being bitten by a dog each year. (CDC.)

The number of fatalities

In 2007, there were 33 fatal dog maulings in the USA.

They took place in 17 states. Ten deaths were in 4 one bite states, of which there are a total of 15. Eight deaths were in the three mixed dog bite statute states. Fifteen deaths were in 8 strict liability states, of which there are a total of 32 plus the District of Columbia.

The number of fatal dog attacks in the USA has been going up. The yearly average was 17 in the 1980s and 1990s; as stated above, there were 33 deaths in 2007, which is roughly double the average in the prior two decades.

The statistics on fatal attacks are more accurate, and more current, than those on dog bites in general. Researchers have to be careful to use current numbers when reporting about canine homicides, because of the sharp increase over the past decade. The yearly number of fatal dog attacks in the USA is variously reported as 12, 17 and 26, but this discrepency is caused by citing studies which took place in different years. It is most accurate to say that the average number was 17 in the 1980s and 1990s, and that it has risen to over 30 in this decade.

The study mentioning 12 deaths per year was published by CDC as Dog-Bite-Related Fatalities -- United States, 1995-1996, MMWR 46(21):463-467, 1997. It related that there were 25 documented deaths in 1995 and 1996 (i.e., 12.5 per year), but a footnote said that the figure 25 probably represented only 75% of the actual number of dog bite related fatalities. This study nevertheless is the source of the oft-cited and misquoted statistic that there are only 12 deaths per year; the footnote is routinely ignored.

See the link for more bad doggy behavior facts.





 
Originally posted by: SlickSnake
What it really boils down to is this. Which creature is most likely to evolve into an advanced and intelligent being given enough time? A feline, obviously. A feline is many millions of years more evolved towards independent and intelligent thought than a canine is.

For a dog it don't take a whole lot of intelligence to follow a pack and obey. Many insects like ants and bees also obey and follow a similar pack mentality. A dog is controlled more by instinct and hormones than free will and intelligence. A dog is obviously stupid or neurotic enough to eat your face off if you happen to pass out next to it due to medical reasons or chemical ones. A dog will also turn on the owner and attack people unprovoked and unexpectedly and injure or kill children and adults they suddenly see as a threat to their pack hierarchy. These unfortunate attacks also happen a lot more often than dog owners would like to admit, too. But it also proves the inherently dangerous situation of having a dog and thus being its pack leader. But stupid people who don?t have a clue about the hierarchal pack mentality of a dog still insist on having large dogs around their children, because they wrongly assume the dog is a lot more intelligent than it really is.

A dog is a merely a semi intelligent pack animal which is entirely dependent on robotic pack behaviors for its survival. People breed dogs for aid in controlling livestock and hunting. People also like dogs because they feel a dog will alert them to danger or frighten people or animals away from them. Dogs were bred specifically for these aggressive pack animal defensive traits, cats were not. The only way you get this level of protection from a feline, is if you successfully tame a feral one, like a tiger or a cheetah or something.

Domestic cats, on the other hand, were tamed and bred by the Egyptians supposedly. They are useful for rodent and insect control. The Egyptians also revered and respected a cats independent thought traits which displays a high intelligence that is largely not controlled by pack mentalities, but rather by a mated pair and a matriarchal hierarchy.

Many dog lovers who also have unstable emotional issues in their lives also like the fact they can subdue and dominate a dog and it will remain stupidly loyal no matter what. In fact, gruesome scientific tests done on dogs over 50 years ago proved a dog will remain loyal even while being dismembered and tortured to death by its master. Is that really loyalty or merely ingrained genetic hierarchal pack behavior?

Dumb people frequently dislike the fact a cat can?t be subdued, controlled and abused by them, and thus naturally prefer dumb dogs. But in my experience it generally seems the lower the IQ the more likely it is that someone will gravitate to dogs rather than cats.

Smarter people on the other hand, can respect a cats intelligence and independent thought and don?t seek out a pet merely to dominate it because of emotional insecurity issues. Now obviously, not every dumb person has a dog, or smart person has a cat, and some people can see the strengths and weaknesses of both and like them equally. But generally I prefer cats over dogs. And the only dogs I like are the more intelligent acting breeds.

:laugh:
 
Originally posted by: SlickSnake
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
dog will find you lost in the snow.
cat will eat your face off when you thaw.

Oh really?
See the link for more bad doggy behavior facts.

lol, doesn't mean squat. dogs have potential, whether it to be trained for hunting, getting rid of rats, herding sheep, protecting property, leading the blind, rescuing people whether lost in the woods or in snow or disaster zones, hunting the criminals on the run, finding bombs, even smelling cancer. sure you can let a few go bad but its potential for good is so far beyond what a cat can do. cats are almost useless. esp in modern life.
 
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: SlickSnake
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
dog will find you lost in the snow.
cat will eat your face off when you thaw.

Oh really?
See the link for more bad doggy behavior facts.

lol, doesn't mean squat. dogs have potential, whether it to be trained for hunting, getting rid of rats, herding sheep, protecting property, leading the blind, rescuing people whether lost in the woods or in snow or disaster zones, hunting the criminals on the run. sure you can let a few go bad but its potential for good is so far beyond what a cat can do. cats are almost useless. esp in modern life.

Forgot to mention that they've been shown to be able to reason, detect cancer, protect people, detect illegal contraband/explosives, assist the handicap, etc...
 
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: SlickSnake
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
dog will find you lost in the snow.
cat will eat your face off when you thaw.

Oh really?
See the link for more bad doggy behavior facts.

lol, doesn't mean squat. dogs have potential, whether it to be trained for hunting, getting rid of rats, herding sheep, protecting property, leading the blind, rescuing people whether lost in the woods or in snow or disaster zones, hunting the criminals on the run. sure you can let a few go bad but its potential for good is so far beyond what a cat can do. cats are almost useless. esp in modern life.

Forgot to mention that they've been shown to be able to reason, detect cancer, protect people, detect illegal contraband/explosives, assist the handicap, etc...

Monkeys can do most of that too, and better. Just look at all the monkeys who are smart enough to post pointless crap on ATOT.
 
Originally posted by: SlickSnake
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: SlickSnake
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
dog will find you lost in the snow.
cat will eat your face off when you thaw.

Oh really?
See the link for more bad doggy behavior facts.

lol, doesn't mean squat. dogs have potential, whether it to be trained for hunting, getting rid of rats, herding sheep, protecting property, leading the blind, rescuing people whether lost in the woods or in snow or disaster zones, hunting the criminals on the run. sure you can let a few go bad but its potential for good is so far beyond what a cat can do. cats are almost useless. esp in modern life.

Forgot to mention that they've been shown to be able to reason, detect cancer, protect people, detect illegal contraband/explosives, assist the handicap, etc...

Monkeys can do most of that too, and better. Just look at all the monkeys who are smart enough to post pointless crap on ATOT.

Coming from the man living in a trailer and believes his Monster Cables provide him with better sound. :laugh:

Oh and please provide links that show that monkey's can do everything mentioned that dogs are capable of.
 
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: SlickSnake
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: SlickSnake
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
dog will find you lost in the snow.
cat will eat your face off when you thaw.

Oh really?
See the link for more bad doggy behavior facts.

lol, doesn't mean squat. dogs have potential, whether it to be trained for hunting, getting rid of rats, herding sheep, protecting property, leading the blind, rescuing people whether lost in the woods or in snow or disaster zones, hunting the criminals on the run. sure you can let a few go bad but its potential for good is so far beyond what a cat can do. cats are almost useless. esp in modern life.

Forgot to mention that they've been shown to be able to reason, detect cancer, protect people, detect illegal contraband/explosives, assist the handicap, etc...

Monkeys can do most of that too, and better. Just look at all the monkeys who are smart enough to post pointless crap on ATOT.

Coming from the man living in a trailer and believes his Monster Cables provide him with better sound. :laugh:

Oh and please provide links that show that monkey's can do everything mentioned that dogs are capable of.

Thanks for proving my point.

Don't you have 8 miles to run on your treadmill today? Or did you park your PC in front of it so you can run at the keys at the same time while eating your banana?
 
Back
Top