Bush to use TARP money to Bailout Autos!

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

daveymark

Lifer
Sep 15, 2003
10,573
1
0
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: winnar111
Kind of funny how the Democratic congress punts this to Bush when they hate him so much.

They know it's a catch 22 and the public opposes it. They are punting to him so they can blame him for it (whether there is a bail out or not) after he leaves office. Bush should go down in history as the ultimate political martyr. I disagree with a lot of things he's done but I admire him for not being a politician and always perceived him as doing what he thought was the "right" thing to do vs politically optimal.

Pretty much. There's a reason Obama already resigned his Senate seat and is currently sitting on his ass.

well said. I can't think of a single politician on the left who doesn't lick their finger and proceed to see which way the wind is blowing before casting a vote. Then again, there aren't' many on the right either.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: winnar111
Kind of funny how the Democratic congress punts this to Bush when they hate him so much.

LOL. Republicans killed the bill and that's why it went to Bush.
But it looks like GOP is going to continue on its self destructive course of doing nothing but obsructing, which is good news for this country. They are still going to get blamed for the economy in 2010.

If you say so.

What a mythical world senseamp created for himself. Democrats were obstructionists to Bush and the Republicans and what happened? They gained overwhelming majorities in both chambers and the white house. But when Republicans do the same the blame will be put on them lol.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: winnar111
Kind of funny how the Democratic congress punts this to Bush when they hate him so much.

LOL. Republicans killed the bill and that's why it went to Bush.
But it looks like GOP is going to continue on its self destructive course of doing nothing but obsructing, which is good news for this country. They are still going to get blamed for the economy in 2010.

If you say so.

What a mythical world senseamp created for himself. Democrats were obstructionists to Bush and the Republicans and what happened? They gained overwhelming majorities in both chambers and the white house. But when Republicans do the same the blame will be put on them lol.

Did you sleep through 2008 election and the rewards GOP got for their obstructionism? Maybe 2010 will wake you up.
 

GroundedSailor

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2001
2,502
0
76
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: sunzt
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
Asian stock markets down heavily in the last half hour or so, Japan down 6% right now. Ehh big deal, Id give up a few point on the dow today for a stronger country tomorrow.

A stronger country that may no longer have a non-foreign controlled manufacturing base and a greatly reduced supplier and dealership companies?

they manufacture cars in the US... though if the native US auto industries were to collapse, they'd be hurt as well.

They don't manufacture in the US, They insource assembly to get huge tax breaks, land and other goodies while showing no profit thus no taxes via ?transfer pricing? a practice where a foreign parent company charges its American subsidiary excessive prices for components and other inputs from home country. It's just gaming states against one another and in the process subsidizing foreign companies to put our own companies out of business.

How dare you bring facts into this discussion! :|

Some one has to state the facts.

Somehow most people seem to ignore the reality of what is going on. The same foreign companies are protected and bailed out by their own Govt, whether by loans, subsidies, even UHC, and import restrictions (how many US cars do you see in Japan or Korea? or even Germany?).

Also on GM's sales figures:
"GM's record third quarter sales were driven by exceptionally strong demand in emerging markets and our improving competitiveness in developed markets. GM global sales of 7.06 million vehicles for the first nine months of the year reflects solid results and more than 2 percent growth. We're on track to have our second-best annual sales performance in our almost 100-year history,"


 

Mani

Diamond Member
Aug 9, 2001
4,808
1
0
Originally posted by: BansheeX
Originally posted by: Mani
Holding up all assistance for a $3 premium in wages is ridiculous. This is classic GOP - vote for ridiculous increases in spending over the last 8 years but quibble over a bill that could save a million jobs. What a posturing bunch of hacks.

I am so sick and fucking tired of every issue turning into a partisan blamegame. Fuck both parties, neither one is consistent. When the financial bailout didn't pass the first time, all kinds of pork had to be added to buy enough votes. Figure it out already. It doesn't change the fact that the bailout is garbage that REDISTRIBUTES money from viable business to unviable ones. What about all the millions of jobs you destroy to "save" these ones, Mani? You can't keep blinding yourself to costs.

Keep living in your dream world. The fact is, the US hasn't been a complete free market for a VERY long time, and never will be. The bailout is a tiny amount of money to protect a huge part of this country's GDP. Emotional knee-jerk reactions like yours accomplish far less than the "partisan blamegame".
 

Mani

Diamond Member
Aug 9, 2001
4,808
1
0
Originally posted by: PokerGuy
Originally posted by: Mani
Holding up all assistance for a $3 premium in wages is ridiculous. This is classic GOP - vote for ridiculous increases in spending over the last 8 years but quibble over a bill that could save a million jobs. What a posturing bunch of hacks.

Yeah, 'cause we have all sorts of guarantees that this bailout would save those jobs for more than a month or two, right? And, we also have a crystal ball that tells us if we don't bail these companies out, they will completely vanish, they won't restructure and survive in a more efficient way :roll:

And, of course, it must all be the GOP's fault, after all, they are the ones who made the big 3 fail </sarcasm>

Wow, did you major in straw man? It's not the GOP's fault the Big 3 is in the shape they are in, but it is their fault if they go under at this point. The auto bailout is a confidence measure. It is a LOAN. And in Ford's case, it's not even that. It is not giving away countless billions that we will never see again. No need for a crystal ball - the reason why an Auto Czar is a part of the bailout is to see through a restructuring.

The fact is, the majority of the opposition to this bill comes not from economists, but from emotional, knee-jerk "they make crappy cars, why should we help them" reactions. Noone is asking to write the auto companies a blank check - they can start by just keeping them afloat.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
Originally posted by: Mani
Wow, did you major in straw man? It's not the GOP's fault the Big 3 is in the shape they are in, but it is their fault if they go under at this point. The auto bailout is a confidence measure. It is a LOAN. And in Ford's case, it's not even that. It is not giving away countless billions that we will never see again. No need for a crystal ball - the reason why an Auto Czar is a part of the bailout is to see through a restructuring.

The fact is, the majority of the opposition to this bill comes not from economists, but from emotional, knee-jerk "they make crappy cars, why should we help them" reactions. Noone is asking to write the auto companies a blank check - they can start by just keeping them afloat.

BS. A "loan" to companies with a flawed and failing business model is not really a loan, it's simply a gift. In this case, it would be a gift to help prop up the unions. Throwing good money after bad is not the answer. I have yet to hear anyone give a good reason or explanation of how a $15 billion loan will fix ANY of the fundamental problems that have gotten the big three in this position. Will it fix stupid management? Nope. Will it fix union driven inflated labor costs? Nope. Will it fix the fact that their vehicles simply are not appealing to the marketplace? Nope. So all it does it pay the bills for a little bit, then they'll simply be back for another (bigger) "loan".
 

Mani

Diamond Member
Aug 9, 2001
4,808
1
0
Originally posted by: PokerGuy
Originally posted by: Mani
Wow, did you major in straw man? It's not the GOP's fault the Big 3 is in the shape they are in, but it is their fault if they go under at this point. The auto bailout is a confidence measure. It is a LOAN. And in Ford's case, it's not even that. It is not giving away countless billions that we will never see again. No need for a crystal ball - the reason why an Auto Czar is a part of the bailout is to see through a restructuring.

The fact is, the majority of the opposition to this bill comes not from economists, but from emotional, knee-jerk "they make crappy cars, why should we help them" reactions. Noone is asking to write the auto companies a blank check - they can start by just keeping them afloat.

BS. A "loan" to companies with a flawed and failing business model is not really a loan, it's simply a gift. In this case, it would be a gift to help prop up the unions. Throwing good money after bad is not the answer. I have yet to hear anyone give a good reason or explanation of how a $15 billion loan will fix ANY of the fundamental problems that have gotten the big three in this position. Will it fix stupid management? Nope. Will it fix union driven inflated labor costs? Nope. Will it fix the fact that their vehicles simply are not appealing to the marketplace? Nope. So all it does it pay the bills for a little bit, then they'll simply be back for another (bigger) "loan".

It's obvious that a 15B loan is not going to solve all of their problems, and of course it's inevitable they'll be back with their palms out in due time. But that's been the point of all the deliberation - putting a system of checks in place with the auto czar being accountable - to make sure auto companies are making progress toward becoming more competitive before coming back for round 2. That includes cutbacks of union benefits (who btw are currently negotiated at 30k/year salaries, far from ridiculous), management restructuring, and product line overhauls.

So what is your solution Pokerguy? Clearly you know something most economists do not. After you give us your credentials on this matter, explain why it would be good to let these companies fail. Thanks.

Edit: and don't give me the naive bullsh*t about "they should file for bankruptcy and come out leaner, meaner, and better in every way"
 

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,255
4,928
136
Well I for one would like to see exactly what changes have been made at the corporate and union levels to address the current situation since the B3 have asked for public funds. Then I'd like to see detailed plans on how they plan to further change during the period they are in possession of these public funds.

Exactly how do they propose to grow the business during this time of economic collapse?

How will prospective buyers get funding to buy their products?

What collateral are the B3 providing to the fed for these loans?

What will the next step be if the B3 fails to make the sales and earn a profit during the next quarter?

Just keep in mind that I'm a union worker who's employer has been shutting down mills during this last quarter since sales and the economy have slowed. We aren't receiving any government money to keep us operating forcing the workers onto unemployment.

I want to know why one industry qualifies for public funding while another one doesn't. Our products are everywhere you look yet we shut down because of the economy. The uaw isn't the only union body out there who's hurting and cars aren't the only domestically producted item that is not selling so get over it.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,330
126
At least its coming out of Tarp. Not like they didn't intend to spend that money on something (probably worse) anyway.
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: winnar111
Kind of funny how the Democratic congress punts this to Bush when they hate him so much.

LOL. Republicans killed the bill and that's why it went to Bush.
But it looks like GOP is going to continue on its self destructive course of doing nothing but obsructing, which is good news for this country. They are still going to get blamed for the economy in 2010.

If you say so.

What a mythical world senseamp created for himself. Democrats were obstructionists to Bush and the Republicans and what happened? They gained overwhelming majorities in both chambers and the white house. But when Republicans do the same the blame will be put on them lol.

Did you sleep through 2008 election and the rewards GOP got for their obstructionism? Maybe 2010 will wake you up.

Obstructionism? Is it now your position that George Bush was not the President for the past 2 years?

It's a shame Bush is rolling over for the unions who stabbed him in the back the past 8 years. They're like grovelling dogs.
 

Eddie313

Senior member
Oct 15, 2006
634
0
71
Originally posted by: Leon
Detroit still have Lions to cheer on, 3 games away from perfection :p

Funny Guy ^^^


When are poeple going to get it, are government don't care about the blue collar worker.
 

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: winnar111
Kind of funny how the Democratic congress punts this to Bush when they hate him so much.

LOL. Republicans killed the bill and that's why it went to Bush.
But it looks like GOP is going to continue on its self destructive course of doing nothing but obsructing, which is good news for this country. They are still going to get blamed for the economy in 2010.

If you say so.

What a mythical world senseamp created for himself. Democrats were obstructionists to Bush and the Republicans and what happened? They gained overwhelming majorities in both chambers and the white house. But when Republicans do the same the blame will be put on them lol.

Did you sleep through 2008 election and the rewards GOP got for their obstructionism? Maybe 2010 will wake you up.

Obstructionism? Is it now your position that George Bush was not the President for the past 2 years?

It's a shame Bush is rolling over for the unions who stabbed him in the back the past 8 years. They're like grovelling dogs.
What's a shame is that people can't get past their union issues. Completely blinded to the consequences of inaction because their daddy hated the union or some other silly-assed piece of baggage their carrying around.
 

BarneyFife

Diamond Member
Aug 12, 2001
3,875
0
76
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: winnar111
Kind of funny how the Democratic congress punts this to Bush when they hate him so much.

LOL. Republicans killed the bill and that's why it went to Bush.
But it looks like GOP is going to continue on its self destructive course of doing nothing but obsructing, which is good news for this country. They are still going to get blamed for the economy in 2010.

If you say so.

What a mythical world senseamp created for himself. Democrats were obstructionists to Bush and the Republicans and what happened? They gained overwhelming majorities in both chambers and the white house. But when Republicans do the same the blame will be put on them lol.

Did you sleep through 2008 election and the rewards GOP got for their obstructionism? Maybe 2010 will wake you up.

Obstructionism? Is it now your position that George Bush was not the President for the past 2 years?

It's a shame Bush is rolling over for the unions who stabbed him in the back the past 8 years. They're like grovelling dogs.

Why so miserable? Not getting laid? Have a shitty job?
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: boomerang

What's a shame is that people can't get past their union issues. Completely blinded to the consequences of inaction because their daddy hated the union or some other silly-assed piece of baggage their carrying around.

Lol, and conversely it's a shame that people can't get past their management issues and "need" a union. Completely blinded to the consequences of their own lack of personal responsibility and individualism because their daddy hated the management or some other silly-assed piece of baggage they're carrying around.
 

Budarow

Golden Member
Dec 16, 2001
1,917
0
0
My prediction??? Bush won't give GM or Chrysler any money unless the unions roll over and take financial hits. It's a game. Dick C. didn't meet behind closed doors with other Repub leaders to give into the unions. They want to break the back of the unions (and the rest of the middle class) and this poor economy is how they intend to do it.

Perfect logic to slash worker wages when the economy turns down. And when the economy turns up again, working people will have to fight even harder to get any wage increases back while the fat cats continue to make tons of $$$ with a bad or good economy.