Burn in week (my method)

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,684
6,252
126
Originally posted by: BarboBot

From that article you may notice that Electronics Manufacturers did in fact "Burn-in" their products, but it wasn't to make them work/perform better, it was to make sure the components wouldn't fail after delivery to the Consumer. That way they could avoid angry Customers and replacing flaky products later.

fair enough but like you said thats electronics and it isn't computer specific and also the first article i've read thus far.[/quote]

Electronics are Electronics.
 

BarboBot

Member
May 29, 2005
34
0
0




ok here are a couple of things i'd like for ya to take a gander at

http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=341296&highlight=CPU+burn - someone elses account with traditional burn in techniques

http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=382751&highlight=CPU+burn - burn in guide and testing results this thread also has other people who have used this technique and had positive results

http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=394163&highlight=CPU+burn - another account of burn in working to help boost cpu OCs and lower temps

http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=393584&highlight=CPU+burn - ocer with 3000+ venice in a dell system that lowered temp/voltage using cpu burn in
 

BarboBot

Member
May 29, 2005
34
0
0
05-09-05, 05:39 PM #11

Clerisy




Rank: Registered
Joined: Apr 2005

Status: Offline




I did Sent's burn in on my proc, a winnie but I think this should still be appropriate. I had it up as far as it would go on the stock voltages, burned while I went to class/sleeping.

I raised the fsb a bit eventually, got it a little higher, burned again. Anyway, the point of that little story was I went down to stock voltages and saw a .1 drop in my minimal Vcore setting as stock speed.

I did this for a little over a week and I'm now stable at 2.0GHz at 1.175 V, longevity is a little more important to me than a couple hundred MHz.

I'm poor.



__________________
3200+ Winnie at 2000 MHz (200 x 10) @ 1.175V 30/33 idle/load
Asus A8V Deluxe
200 gig WD ATA HD
1 gig Corsair Value ram, PC3200 (1:1)
ATI Radeon 9600XT
XP 120 (For that nice little bit of cooling)

another interesting tid bit i picked up also i don't think a little thermal paste setting will yeild that
 

TuxDave

Lifer
Oct 8, 2002
10,571
3
71
Originally posted by: BarboBot
its so you can overclock higher at lower or stock voltage. you're training your parts to run with stability at lower voltages...

I'm really curious on exactly what people mean when they say that. 'Training'. Transistors aren't intellegence and/or living beings so they won't just naturally figure out a new way of existing. Something physical has to change and I'm really curious what that may be.
 

rise

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2004
9,116
46
91
meh, its worth a try i figure. a lot of people have claimed good results some have had no results.

i only managed 2 burn in sessions before some new ram came in and i want to get that going first. but after 2 runs, 1 6 hours and 1 10 hours, i will say me results are nil. but, i also PM'd sen as i'm not sure if i'm doing it 100% correctly.

i'll give it another go once i get my ram tweaked.
 

BarboBot

Member
May 29, 2005
34
0
0

I'm really curious on exactly what people mean when they say that. 'Training'. Transistors aren't intellegence and/or living beings so they won't just naturally figure out a new way of existing. Something physical has to change and I'm really curious what that may be.[/quote]


Its not really training you starve the parts for voltages thus causeing then to adapt to not have the stock required voltage and lowering the voltage necessary for them function and still be stable (this also lowers the operating temps).

ok on with the update. I've just started my next session 1.275v comp booted up fine and i've started it in on the 8 hour burn in session at about 10 mins in the cpu is running at 36c under initial load (i'm pretty sure that will drop down a little bit throught the session as it has with other sessions. usuallyl it starts out a 37c). No crashes or reboots yet mid to low 1.something volts are begining to look feasable.
 

Vegitto

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
5,234
1
0
Yeah, well, it was never really confirmed, but I'm like:"If it don't help, it don't hurt." I'm gonna try it with my new processor, too.

@ BarboBot: Good luck, buddy. I'm guessing 1.00 V is feasible.
 

BarboBot

Member
May 29, 2005
34
0
0




thanks for the support vegitto good luck to you also i'm hoping 1.0v burn in will be possible. i'm a little off course today (had to work a 12hr day today) so i'm runing prime95 on my current voltage(1.275v) to get a little extra stress on in since i have to wait till i go out to start my next session.
 

theMan

Diamond Member
Mar 17, 2005
4,386
0
0
Originally posted by: TuxDave
Originally posted by: BarboBot
its so you can overclock higher at lower or stock voltage. you're training your parts to run with stability at lower voltages...

I'm really curious on exactly what people mean when they say that. 'Training'. Transistors aren't intellegence and/or living beings so they won't just naturally figure out a new way of existing. Something physical has to change and I'm really curious what that may be.

exactly what i was going to say...
 

BarboBot

Member
May 29, 2005
34
0
0




ok i'm about 3/4ths through my 1.24v burn in session its lookin really stable 31c at idle 35 under load. with the last burn in i had some extra time to run more tests ran prime95 for about 2 hours to see what the results were passed all the test easy (figured i see if everything was still stable) so far so good i think i'm gonna be able to work all the way down to 1.0v (or even less at this rate :shocked: in which case i might have to burn my house down)
 

BarboBot

Member
May 29, 2005
34
0
0




ok just started the 1.22v session (10 hrs) its idling at 29c and is getting up to 34c under load. after this test is over i'm changing out the hsf for something a little stronger this fan isn't getting the rpms i want (its only getting like 2100rpms avg i want something like 3000rpms or at least 2500rpms)
 

Vegitto

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
5,234
1
0
Originally posted by: BarboBot




ok just started the 1.22v session (10 hrs) its idling at 29c and is getting up to 34c under load. after this test is over i'm changing out the hsf for something a little stronger this fan isn't getting the rpms i want (its only getting like 2100rpms avg i want something like 3000rpms or at least 2500rpms)


Go for it! Could you show a CPU-Z screenie of the processor running at 1.22V or less?
 

BarboBot

Member
May 29, 2005
34
0
0




yeah need to get a good screen capture prog (any suggestions) and i will be happy to my comp is currently bare except for BF2 and overclocking/burn in progs. just about halfway into the 1.20v burn in session 30c idle 35c load. just put filters on my intake fans so the case temp is up a little bit but still around 33-34 range so i'm not complainin. waiting till after this burn in is done to grab a stronger hsf.
 

garkon

Senior member
Aug 13, 2004
608
1
76
I'm still interested, i've never heard of this, so to sort of follow its corse is interesting. Wondering what the results will amount too! I always like learning a little bit more bout comps. Cant wait for screens. Keep it up.
 

BarboBot

Member
May 29, 2005
34
0
0
isn't there a decent little program that i can use to get screenies to post :( i've got started my 1.16v burn in session tried the print screen method to no avail i'm gonna check and see if i can find a screen capture prog to download.
 

Vegitto

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
5,234
1
0
Originally posted by: BarboBot
isn't there a decent little program that i can use to get screenies to post :( i've got started my 1.16v burn in session tried the print screen method to no avail i'm gonna check and see if i can find a screen capture prog to download.

HyperSnap-DX tickled my fancy, maybe it'll work for you, too.
 

BarboBot

Member
May 29, 2005
34
0
0




lmao sorry man maybe my terminology is a little off, but bare with (the results are there) thanks a million Vegitto lemme get that installed on my comp right quick and i'll have you screenies for the last part of this testing session :)
 

BarboBot

Member
May 29, 2005
34
0
0
lmao this is bad vegitto but one more question (the program works friggin great btw) how do i post the pix i've got the ones you wanna see (well below 1.2v)