Buffer Zones (abortion clinics) and Anthony Scalia's opening arguments

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Spoken like an asshat. Bravo.




This isn't Dune, speech isn't a weapon. Not that anti choice zealots have been hindered by laws that address injuring and killing others in the past. Bullets don't have a problem with that distance, same with Molotov cocktails or pipebombs. Thankfully the majority of the protestors are too pussy to up the ante by involving weapons. 35ft seems to work well with fists, feet and saliva though. Please do try to focus your woman hate, it's making you sound more idiotic than normal.

The SPITE MUST FLOW!
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,013
55,460
136
Personally I'd support a 1/4 mile buffer on all protesters, for everything, including Occupy Wall Street. Protesters in general are a useless bunch of twats and I'd much rather be wondering what those twats are getting on about than actually hearing it.

Nah. I'm in favor of more speech rather than less. I believe America is better off when people can protest things they don't like, even if those protests are vile like anti-choice people.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Nah. I'm in favor of more speech rather than less. I believe America is better off when people can protest things they don't like, even if those protests are vile like anti-choice people.
I'm in favor of more speech as well. I just want them well out of my way while they are doing their speech. Their free speech rights do not impose on me an obligation to listen.
 

monovillage

Diamond Member
Jul 3, 2008
8,444
1
0
I'm in favor of more speech as well. I just want them well out of my way while they are doing their speech. Their free speech rights do not impose on me an obligation to listen.

We should not be able to single out a single protest target and hit them with extreme restrictions, but permit other protests. If they apply to political abortion protests they should apply to all political protests. This is not only a 1st Amendment issue, it's also a 14th Amendment and equal protection clause issue.
 

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
the pro-choice movement has become as reactionary and tyrannical as the extreme pro-life movement, but too many dependent fuckheads in NoVA and their tools in the rest of VA failed to realize that and voted for McAwful anyway... it is tyrannical that tax payers have to foot the bill for the dependent leeches abortion clinics are. why can't i have a physician assisted suicide at tax payer expense? if Keynesian policy is such an investment, then why the fuck does the State of McAwful have to give special privileges to some rather than just not taking rights away? if the State of VA sets me up and then punishes/institutionalizes me, then... isnt that a lot more wasteful than just not executing (or not punishing in any other way) the person who gives me or sells me a loaded sawed off shotgun?

anyway, Wilsonian Partymen have always supported abortion because they have always feared for their security and supported depopulation. Remember that fuckegg leech of an IP troll bill gates (who cant think outside of the box well enough to know that he cannot rid the world of innocent brown people)? well, if i was a member of a free, sovereign, and voluntary democracy, then i would vote to outlaw his ass.
 
Last edited:

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
198
106
Soooo does that mean the Walmart and McDonalds protestors can be right by the businesses entry ways too, to just have open dialogue with people who go into the stores??? LOL

Walmart and mcdonalds are not killing children.

Just because something is legal does not make it right.

At one time black people were property and their owner could kill them at will. Should we be proud of how many blacks were killed as slaves?

Abortion is legalized murder, and is no different than slavery.


as women were being obstructed and exposed to a barrage of verbal abuse entering clinics.

As they should be.

What should we do when a woman is going to kill her child? Sit back and watch?
 
Last edited:

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,013
55,460
136
Walmart and mcdonalds are not killing children.

Just because something is legal does not make it right.

At one time black people were property and their owner could kill them at will. Should we be proud of how many blacks were killed as slaves?

Abortion is legalized murder, and is no different than slavery.

So you want to selectively limit or allow free speech based on the content of it. Sounds exactly like what this law was doing.

You're just arguing for freedom of speech that you like.
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
Spoken like an asshat. Bravo.

I am 100% serious. How can pro-choicers on the one hand say that the fetus is a worthless clump of cells, and then turn around and talk about what a hard decision it is to remove it?

Not saying it is exactly a fun experience. But perhaps akin to having a rotten tooth removed.
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
198
106
So you want to selectively limit or allow free speech based on the content of it. Sounds exactly like what this law was doing.

You're just arguing for freedom of speech that you like.

Content / context is everything.

It means the difference between murder and self-defense. It means the difference between a drug addict and someone suffering from cancer.

If a mother was going to kill her 1 year old child the police, or anyone for that matter, could take whatever measures needed to protect the life of the child.

But yet people are supposed to stand to the side while women systemically kill their unborn children?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,013
55,460
136
Content / context is everything.

It means the difference between murder and self-defense. It means the difference between a drug addict and someone suffering from cancer.

If a mother was going to kill her 1 year old child the police, or anyone for that matter, could take whatever measures needed to protect the life of the child.

But yet people are supposed to stand to the side while women systemically kill their unborn children?

Nothing you wrote there changes the fact that you want to restrict speech you don't like and promote speech you do like. That is against everything the bill of rights stands for.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,791
6,351
126
Walmart and mcdonalds are not killing children.

Just because something is legal does not make it right.

At one time black people were property and their owner could kill them at will. Should we be proud of how many blacks were killed as slaves?

Abortion is legalized murder, and is no different than slavery.




As they should be.

What should we do when a woman is going to kill her child? Sit back and watch?

Your Personal Opinion on this amounts to Jack Shit. She is Legally allowed to enter and to use the services available.
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
198
106
Nothing you wrote there changes the fact that you want to restrict speech you don't like and promote speech you do like. That is against everything the bill of rights stands for.

I would not restrict any kind of speech or expression.

But there is a time and place for certain things.


Your Personal Opinion on this amounts to Jack Shit. She is Legally allowed to enter and to use the services available.

And we were legally allowed to kill native Americans, and we were legally allowed to own blacks and kill them as our property, and sell their children. Blacks were no different than dogs, breed them, shoot them, work them, sell them as their owner wished.

Does being legal make a crime against humanity any less of a crime?
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,791
6,351
126
I would not restrict any kind of speech or expression.

But there is a time and place for certain things.




And we were legally allowed to kill native Americans, and we were legally allowed to own blacks and kill them as our property, and sell their children. Blacks were no different than dogs, breed them, shoot them, work them, sell them as their owner wished.

Does being legal make a crime against humanity any less of a crime?

Harassing Women who are going through a tough time is not acceptable, regardless of the wrong headed opinion you have on the subject.
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
Nothing you wrote there changes the fact that you want to restrict speech you don't like and promote speech you do like. That is against everything the bill of rights stands for.

Sounds like he is doing just what the Massachusetts law does :whiste:
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
198
106
Harassing Women who are going through a tough time is not acceptable, regardless of the wrong headed opinion you have on the subject.

Does being legal make a crime against humanity any less of a crime?

And how dare you justify the death of those who can not defend themselves.
 

bshole

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2013
8,315
1,215
126
Why the fuck don't pro-choice people find the church that these nutters attend and then start protesting the church during morning services. Get real vile and spit on the them as they try to enter their place of worship. Make them fear for their lives. Level the playing field. Bully the bullies.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,791
6,351
126
Does being legal make a crime against humanity any less of a crime?

And how dare you justify the death of those who can not defend themselves.

It is not a Crime. As I said earlier, your opinion amounts to Jack Shit on the subject.
 

MrPickins

Diamond Member
May 24, 2003
9,125
792
126
I am 100% serious. How can pro-choicers on the one hand say that the fetus is a worthless clump of cells, and then turn around and talk about what a hard decision it is to remove it?

Not saying it is exactly a fun experience. But perhaps akin to having a rotten tooth removed.

From your posts here, it pretty obvious that you're going to die alone and unloved by any woman.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,013
55,460
136
Why the fuck don't pro-choice people find the church that these nutters attend and then start protesting the church during morning services. Get real vile and spit on the them as they try to enter their place of worship. Make them fear for their lives. Level the playing field. Bully the bullies.

No need to sink to the moral level of anti choice people. Having bad people like that reveal just how shitty they are is one of the best weapons in the pro choice arsenal.
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
From your posts here, it pretty obvious that you're going to die alone and unloved by any woman.

Come on now it shouldn't be so hard to justify yourself. Why is removing some unwanted cells such a hard decision. Is it a hard decision to decide to get a wart removed?:colbert:
 

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
198
106
It is not a Crime. As I said earlier, your opinion amounts to Jack Shit on the subject.

Was it ok for a slave owner to kill his slaves?


Why the fuck don't pro-choice people find the church that these nutters attend and then start protesting the church during morning services. Get real vile and spit on the them as they try to enter their place of worship. Make them fear for their lives. Level the playing field. Bully the bullies.

That would be ok if the church was killing children.