yllus
Elite Member & Lifer
What? Japan made nuclear weapons and South Korea made it. You think they will let North Korea have them but not themselves?
I'm not aware of Japan or South Korea manufacturing nuclear weapons. Could you provide sources?
What? Japan made nuclear weapons and South Korea made it. You think they will let North Korea have them but not themselves?
Holy moving goalposts Batman!Canada helped the US made the bomb which was dropped on Japan
1. A nuclear reactor is a controlled nuclear bomb. Instead of a Megaton blast there is Mkw of instant energy generated.I'm not aware of Japan or South Korea manufacturing nuclear weapons. Could you provide sources?
Canadian nuclear lobbyists often refer to the "thorium cycle" as an alternative to the "plutonium economy." By itself, thorium -- which is more plentiful than uranium -- cannot be used to build an atomic bomb or to fuel a nuclear reactor. However, when thorium is placed inside a nuclear reactor, it "breeds" a new substance called uranium-233, which does not exist in nature. If the thorium is then reprocessed, the uranium-233, can be separated from the rest of the radioactive garbage and used as a reactor fuel. But uranium-233 is also an excellent weapons-grade material, in many respects superior to plutonium. Thus the thorium cycle in no way avoids the security problems associated with a plutonium economy. In January 1982, AECL announced plans to build a laboratory at Varennes, Quebec, to produce uranium-233 as an "artificial substitute" for natural uranium. (In technical terms, the AECL thorium cycle involves a "near-breeder" rather than a "breeder" concept.)
The new enthusiasm for the plutonium economy and the thorium cycle shows that, as before, any attempt to change the priorities of Canada's nuclear industry will run up against the wall of technological complexity that has given it a certain degree of immunity from lay scrutiny. But there is a larger obstacle: because of huge investments of public money and extensive public ownership, the goals of the nuclear lobby are inextricably intertwined with those of governments at various levels. It sometimes seems that the nuclear industry is a force unto itself, operating with impunity. On one of the rare occasions when AECL was held publicly accountable, during the investigations into financial wrongdoing by the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee, unsettling revelations came to light. In its final report, tabled on 27 February 1978, the committee concluded:
Some witnesses of AECL management were reluctant and uncooperative in testifying, and in the case of the chief witness, J. Lorne Gray, evasive as well.
Mr. Gray, then President of AECL, on his own initiative, committed the Crown corporation, and therefore the Government and the people of Canada, to immense expenditures of public funds for agents' fees. Furthermore, Mr. Gray did not know what services were being performed by the agents nor who ultimately received the payments. In the case of the Argentine sale, he stated that he did not even want to know the agent's identity.
Mr. Ross Campbell, Chairman of the AECL, not only failed to put the agreement [ with sales agent Shoul Eisenberg] on a better footing, but also appointed Eisenberg as exclusive agent for the sale of a second [CANDU] unit to South Korea without specifying the charges to be made for these services.
AECL management did not follow acceptable business practices ... nor did it have due regard for the high standard of business ethics which Crown corporations should observe.
The senior management of AECL, including the Secretary, the Treasurer, and the Internal Auditor, did not properly discharge their responsibilities as officers.
http://www.ccnr.org/nuclear_primer.htmlThe nuclear renaissance is in fact a nuclear relapse. Proliferation of nuclear power will be accompanied by a multiplication of nuclearweapons states. Nuclear proponents have long known that uranium supplies will not outlast oil supplies if tens of thousands of reactors are built. Thus nuclear power cannot replace a significant fraction of oil unless plutonium is used as the nuclear fuel of the future. It is no accident that the countries most committed to nuclear power France, Japan, India, Russia, England have all made large investments in plutonium recycling technology. Using plutonium as a commercially traded fuel guarantees that this nuclear explosive material will fall into the hands of criminal organizations and terrorist groups. The advent of a plutonium economy makes a nuclear-weapons free world impossible
Holy moving goalposts Batman!
In fact Canada helped more countries making bombs than the whole nuclear industry together.For over twenty years, Chalk River sold plutonium to the U.S. bomb program to help defray the escalating costs of Canadian nuclear research.
Canada and the First Atomic Bombs
When C. D. Howe heard, on August 6, 1945, that a uranium bomb had destroyed the city of Hiroshima, he was not surprised. As Minister responsible for Canada's part in the World War II Atomic Bomb Project, he knew it was intended.
He had prepared a statement for the press in advance. "It is a distinct pleasure for me to announce," he said, "that Canadian scientists have played an intimate part, and have been associated in an effective way with this great scientific development."
Three days later, a plutonium bomb destroyed Nagasaki.
For the first time, Canadians were told that uranium from Great Bear Lake in the Northwest Territories, and scientists working in a secret laboratory in Montreal, had played an important role in the Anglo-Canadian-American Atomic Bomb Project -- the largest secret project in human history.
The tripartite A-Bomb Project was a joint venture that began in 1940-41. It was cemented with a secret Agreement signed by Roosevelt and Churchill in Quebec City, August 1943.
The Quebec Agreement stipulated that the Bomb would not be used "against each other," or "against third parties without each other's consent". It also established a Combined Policy Committee of six to deal with the Bomb: three Americans, two Brits, and the Honourable C. D. Howe.
By the time the first A-Bombs were used, Roosevelt and Churchill were gone. Truman and Atlee, their successors, knew nothing about the atomic bomb before they came to office.
But Mackenzie King was still Prime Minister, and he knew. On October 11, 1945, he wrote in his diary: "How strange it is that I should find myself at the very centre of the problem, through Canada possessing uranium, having contributed to the production of the bomb, being recognized as one of the three countries to hold most of the secrets."
Stranger still is the secrecy that still shrouds Canada's historic role, and the lack of public awareness regarding Canada's current nuclear policies.
Selling Plutionium != making nuclear weapons.In fact Canada helped more countries making bombs than the whole nuclear industry together.
http://www.ccnr.org/index.html#dir
1. A nuclear reactor is a controlled nuclear bomb. Instead of a Megaton blast there is Mkw of instant energy generated.
In fact Canada helped more countries making bombs than the whole nuclear industry together.
A nuclear chain reaction right? Oh yes both is a nuclear chain reaction. That nuclear core goes boom like ??????????? Chernobyl. Ask the british what happened to their meat when a Nuclear reactor without coolling went boom in the Ukraine. That was not steam.Oh, nonsense. There is an enormous difference between splitting atoms in a controlled environment to generate heat (and via it, electricity) and doing so in a bomb designed to maximize destruction of everything around it. You might as well consider using electricity to light a house and to kill someone in an electric chair the same thing. (Actually, that's exactly what you're doing.)
INITIAL ACTIVITY OF RADIONUCLIDES
IN THE NUCLEAR REACTOR CORE
AT THE TIME OF THE HYPOTHETICAL ACCIDENT
Radioactive Inventory
No. Radionuclide (Source Term in curies) Half Life
== ============ ======================== ==========
1 Cobalt-58 780 thousand 10.1 weeks
2 Cobalt-60 290 thousand 5.25 years
3 Krypton-85 560 thousand 10.8 years
4 Krypton-85m 24 million 4.4 hours
5 Krypton-87 47 million 1.25 hours
6 Krypton-88 68 million 2.8 hours
7 Rubidium-86 26 thousand 2.67 weeks
8 Strontium-89 94 million 7.4 weeks
9 Strontium-90 3 million 700 thousand 30.2 years
10 Strontium-91 110 million 9.7 hours
11 Yttrium-90 390 thousand 2.67 days
12 Yttrium-91 120 million 8.4 weeks
13 Zirconium-95 150 million 9.3 weeks
14 Zirconium-97 150 million 17.0 hours
15 Niobium-95 150 million 5.0 weeks
16 Molybdenum-99 160 million 2.8 days
17 Technetium-99m 140 million 6.0 hours
18 Ruthenium-103 110 million 5.64 weeks
19 Ruthenium-105 72 million 4.44 hours
20 Ruthenium-106 25 million 1.0 years
21 Rhodium-105 49 million 1.50 days
22 Tellurium-127 5 million 900 thousand 9.38 hours
23 Tellurium-127m 1 million 100 thousand 15.6 weeks
24 Tellurium-129 31 million 1.15 hours
25 Tellurium-129m 5 million 300 thousand 8.16 hours
26 Tellurium-131m 13 million 1.25 days
27 Tellurium-132 120 million 3.25 days
28 Antimony-127 6 million 100 thousand 3.88 days
29 Antimony-129 33 million 4.30 hours
30 Iodine-131 85 million 8.05 days
31 Iodine-132 120 million 2.30 hours
32 Iodine-133 170 million 21.0 hours
33 Iodine-134 190 million 53 minutes
34 Iodine-135 150 million 6.72 hours
35 Xenon-133 170 million 5.28 days
36 Xenon-135 34 million 9.2 hours
37 Cesium-134 7 million 500 thousand 2.05 years
38 Cesium-136 3 million 13.0 days
39 Cesium-137 4 million 700 thousand 30.1 years
40 Barium-140 160 million 12.8 days
41 Lanthanum-14 0 160 million 1.67 days
42 Cerium-141 150 million 4.6 weeks
43 Cerium-143 130 million 1.38 days
44 Cerium-144 85 million 40.6 weeks
45 Praseodymium-143 130 million 13.7 days
46 Neodymium-147 60 million 11.1 days
47 Neptunium-239 1 billion 640 million 2.35 days
48 Plutonium-238 57 thousand 89.0 years
49 Plutonium-239 21 thousand 24,000 years
50 Plutonium-240 21 thousand 6,571 years
51 Plutonium-241 3 million 400 thousand 14.6 years
52 Americium-241 1 thousand 7 hundred 410.7 years
53 Curium-242 500 thousand 23.3 weeks
54 Curium-244 23 thousand 18.1 years
An H-bomb is a three-stage weapon: fission, fusion, and then fission again. The first stage, called the "trigger" , is a small plutonium bomb similar to the one dropped on Nagasaki in 1945. The energy release at this stage is mainly due to nuclear fission
Actually true, but certainly not in the way you're implying. Reactors provided to India and Pakistan assisted them in their weaponization of nuclear energy, but again, saying Canada "helped" other nations get the nuclear bomb is the same silliness as saying Colt Firearms "helps" criminals murder people.
Israel is not under any agreement with the IAEA for inspections. Unlike Iran
Yeah, they lied about having nukes for years and years while they secretly developed them w\ stolen technology--really???, etc...did they---you are very misinformed!! In fact you are making this up....popular opinion is that the United States gave Israel thye technology or for that matter even the bomb...if they have nuclear capability at all...
And here they are threatening to use them over the past couple years. -- Israel has never threatened to use nuclear weapons. --really -- link please....
It has been widely assummed that in the event of an attack of such magnitude that the nation of aisrael would be wiped off the face of the earth that they would use nuclear wepons if they had them as a last ditch response!!
They're doing exactly what we're accusing these other guys of doing as pretext for war LOL LOL -- no but your fantasies are interesting!!
You really cannot make this shit up. And now they're going to bar the UN from entering their country? ORLY?--- actually you can and did make it up!!
I'm not aware of Japan or South Korea manufacturing nuclear weapons. Could you provide sources?
1. A nuclear reactor is a controlled nuclear bomb. Instead of a Megaton blast there is Mkw of instant energy generated.
When we get down to it, Israel is learning a very bad habit. As Israel manages to avoid international oversight once again. As past and current Israeli behavior IMHO is quite outrageous.
snip
But as we look at the almost infinitely long list of nations that got away with bullshit, why should Israelis assume that they will never overreach or keep getting away with their conduct.
As Israel also faces formal war crime charges for its rape of Gaza, and IMHO should also face war crimes charges for its rape of Lebanon. As I also may advocate the USA in the persons of GWB, Dick Cheney, and arguably Barack Obama may join that war crimes list in the near future.
Originally Posted by airdata
Yeah, they lied about having nukes for years and years while they secretly developed them w\ stolen technology--really???, etc...did they---you are very misinformed!! In fact you are making this up....popular opinion is that the United States gave Israel thye technology or for that matter even the bomb...if they have nuclear capability at all...
And here they are threatening to use them over the past couple years. -- Israel has never threatened to use nuclear weapons. --really -- link please....
It has been widely assummed that in the event of an attack of such magnitude that the nation of aisrael would be wiped off the face of the earth that they would use nuclear wepons if they had them as a last ditch response!!
They're doing exactly what we're accusing these other guys of doing as pretext for war LOL LOL -- no but your fantasies are interesting!!
You really cannot make this shit up. And now they're going to bar the UN from entering their country? ORLY?--- actually you can and did make it up!!
Where's your links Jedi?
The link you posted begins like this -- Israel is widely believed to be the sixth country in the world to have developed nuclear weapons[5] and to be one of four nuclear-armed countries not recognized as a Nuclear Weapons State by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), the others being India, Pakistan and North Korea.[6] Former International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Mohamed ElBaradei regarded Israel as a state possessing nuclear weapons,[7] but Israel maintains a policy known as "nuclear ambiguity" (also known as "nuclear opacity").[8][9] Israel has never officially admitted to having nuclear weapons, instead repeating over the years that it would not be the first country to "introduce" nuclear weapons to the Middle East, leaving ambiguity as to whether it means it will not create, will not disclose, will not make first use of the weapons or possibly some other interpretation of the phrase.[10] The "not be the first" formulation goes back to before March 11 1965, when a cable from the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv to Washington noted "The Government of Israel has reaffirmed that Israel will not be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into the Arab-Israel area."[11] Israel has refused to sign the NPT despite international pressure to do so, and has stated that signing the NPT would be contrary to its national security interests.[12] --- Which supports my premise to Airdata...you really need to read what is posted and discern who posted what....
No one knows for sure if Israel has nukes or not.
And if anyone really helped them out to acquire them it would of been France or Britain, defiantly not the US
The US did not really start supporting Israel until more recently as the money flow to your politicians increased
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_and_Israel
Lets look at what i said -- which is bolded in black...
Originally Posted by airdata
Yeah, they lied about having nukes for years and years while they secretly developed them w\ stolen technology--really???, etc...did they---you are very misinformed!! In fact you are making this up....popular opinion is that the United States gave Israel the technology or for that matter even the bomb...if they have nuclear capability at all...
And here they are threatening to use them over the past couple years. -- Israel has never threatened to use nuclear weapons. --really -- link please....
It has been widely assummed that in the event of an attack of such magnitude that the nation of aisrael would be wiped off the face of the earth that they would use nuclear wepons if they had them as a last ditch response!!
They're doing exactly what we're accusing these other guys of doing as pretext for war LOL LOL -- no but your fantasies are interesting!!
You really cannot make this shit up. And now they're going to bar the UN from entering their country? ORLY?--- actually you can and did make it up!!
I know...kinda like the middle east.....That's a mess