JEDIYoda
Lifer
Can you quote me on that quote in your sig?
Why?
What Atreus21 said is much more relevant when it comes to Peace in the Middle East!
Can you quote me on that quote in your sig?
Why?
What Atreus21 said is much more relevant when it comes to Peace in the Middle East!
Where did the bolded come from?
Jordan wanted control of the West Bank from day 1. They lost it to Israel.
It was not theirs to give in the first place.
They took it over by military conquest - exactly what people are now condemning Israel for. The only difference between the two is Jordan is Arab and Israel is not.
Incorrect. The 1948 partition of Palestine called for Jordan, what is now Israel, and Palestine to be separate entities. Partition of Palestine as shown on many maps. When a ceasefire was declared, The Jordanians, who had entered the West Bank in support of the Pals, simply remained until ejected by Israel in 1967.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordanian_occupation_of_the_West_Bank_and_East_Jerusalem
Pals are, for the purposes of international travel, still Jordanian citizens to this day. They have to be citizens of some country to do so.-- not exactly true-- http://www.badil.org/en/article74/item/1569-interview1
At least JediYoda is providing links. All we are getting from you, Jhhnn, is a lot of handwaving hyperbole and nothing in the way of substantiating your claims.Obviously, JediYoda, Palestinian people who were living in Israel itself after the ceasefire in 1948 are second class Israeli citizens- it was part of the deal. Not that the Israelis wanted them, but were rather stuck with them- the price of peace.
You have the nerve to quote that raving paranoid lunacy as a historical source? Really?
Do yourself a favor, wait for instructions from the mothership before posting such drivel, OK?
At least JediYoda is providing links. All we are getting from you, Jhhnn, is a lot of handwaving hyperbole and nothing in the way of substantiating your claims.
The Palestinians in Israel are second class citizens? Odd then that every poll of Israeli Arabs has shown that they prefer to continue living in Israel and are opposed to joining any future Palestinian State, should one ever be formed. Even if they aren't treated as exact equals of Israeli Jews they still know they are treated far better than they would be in any neighboring Arab country.
You linked Wikipedia and basically ignored much of the information provided in that same link, so it was a weak attempt to substatiate whatever claim you were trying to counter. Were you hoping people wouldn't actually read it? You were wrong about the passports too.I link Wikipedia, at which point JediYoda responds with a link to a raving paranoid lunatic zionist propaganda site appropriately named "Masada", & you defend him? Really?
Where was there any "apology?" Are you really so desparate to make a point, any point, that you constantly have to rely upon hyperbole? Are there cases of discrimination in Israel against their Arab population? Sure. Does that mean that those Arabs are treated as second class citizens as a rule of thumb? Of course not.At which point you admit that Israeli Arabs are treated as second class, then obfuscate around it, offering apologisms.
Anything to avoid cognitive dissonance, huh?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------At least JediYoda is providing links. All we are getting from you, Jhhnn, is a lot of handwaving hyperbole and nothing in the way of substantiating your claims.
The Palestinians in Israel are second class citizens? Odd then that every poll of Israeli Arabs has shown that they prefer to continue living in Israel and are opposed to joining any future Palestinian State, should one ever be formed. Even if they aren't treated as exact equals of Israeli Jews they still know they are treated far better than they would be in any neighboring Arab country.
Learn to read, LL. I didn't use the term "Arab nationals." I used the term "Arab Israelis" as a classification of Arabs within Israel that have Israeli citizenship. The only one confused here is you.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As TLC is somehow confused on the terms. As there were both Arab nationals and Palestinians living inside Israel immediately after the 3/1948 declaration of UN Statehood. And even after Israel barely beat off the Arab armies post 3/1948, Israel could ill afford alienating Arab States by expelling Arab nationals. As for the powerless Palestinians, Israel robbed the indigenous Palestinians of their human rights and property.
So why prey tell TLC, why did you use the terms Arab Nationals and Palestinians as interchangeable classifications? When post 1948 Israel treated them quite differently?
But still point granted, Arab National Israeli citizens almost still enjoy first class Israeli citizenship and are economically better off, partially due to US subsidizes than their equivalents in other Arab nations.
But to some extent Israeli Arabs are living on borrowed time, as Israeli visionaries like A. Lieberman have well established plans to deport all Arab Nationals to a Palestinian State if and when such a Palestinian State is established.
But it still explains why Israeli liberals are terrified of Israeli extremism and Hamas, as Netanyuhu and Israeli settler parties busily kill off the viability of any Palestinian state. And failing a two State solution, the only remaining Israeli end possibility is to force Israel to assimilate its Palestinians with full voting rights. And then Arab nationals and Palestinians would have as many votes as Israeli Jews.
Exactly what happened to that other apartheid State of South Africa.
snip
...And failing a two State solution, the only remaining Israeli end possibility is to force Israel to assimilate its Palestinians with full voting rights. And then Arab nationals and Palestinians would have as many votes as Israeli Jews.
Exactly what happened to that other apartheid State of South Africa.
You'll have to be more narrow than that. After all, democratic (or quasi-democratic) countries like Italy and Switzerland would fit your list, but they are among the biggest offenders of human rights.
yeah, other countries already have them.Nope.
Iran is being targeted for nuclear inspections because Iran is developing nuclear technologies while other countries are not.
Focus, young Grasshopper.
The allocation of its resources has nothing to do with the presence or absence of human rights violations.
Now, answer my simple yes/no question, do you believe what goes on in Israel is more important than what goes on in Syria or Iran?
eskimospy I answered your question, yet you still have refused to answer my question. It is a simple yes/no opinion question. If you believe Israel's actions are more important than Syria or Iran's actions, then all you have to do is respond with a "yes".
Imagine you are downtown and you witness a known gay black man jaywalking, and a known straight white man running out of a bank with a sack of money and alarms blaring. You are not in a position to assist, only watch as an on-duty police officer luckily is in the area with enough time to chase after only one of the men.
Do you want the officer to chase one man over the other? And for what reason?
Both men committed crimes, therefore the police officer has the option to go after either of them without any objection from you, correct?
hehehe 😀RedString said:Wtf are you talking about? The more important and felony crime would take priority. A cop nor anyone else would stop to think about this. Where are you getting these ridiculous questions?
Obviously, JediYoda, Palestinian people who were living in Israel itself after the ceasefire in 1948 are second class Israeli citizens- it was part of the deal. Not that the Israelis wanted them, but were rather stuck with them- the price of peace.
Obviously??If thats what you believe even when confronted by others with irrefutable proof!
You have the nerve to quote that raving paranoid lunacy as a historical source? Really?-- truth hurst huh??Get use to it!!
Obviously, JediYoda, Palestinian people who were living in Israel itself after the ceasefire in 1948 are second class Israeli citizens- it was part of the deal. Not that the Israelis wanted them, but were rather stuck with them- the price of peace.
You have the nerve to quote that raving paranoid lunacy as a historical source? Really?
Do yourself a favor, wait for instructions from the mothership before posting such drivel, OK?
Switzerland is among the biggest offenders of human rights?
What countries are you comparing this to?
yeah, other countries already have them.
Seems suspicious to me. Let them investigate, then if it's un-true, back up your rebuttal with proof and why they're wrong. But ofc, most people refuse to acknowledge Israels problems. They just see it as 'Oh you're pro-palestine, or anti-semite!' and leave it at that. You say they're unable to think objectively? I say you have something in common. Like poster above stated, plenty of other councils have voiced negative opinions on the actions of Israel time and time again. But they're just pro-palestinian huh?
Why would it not? Israel has more impact on an international scale than either of those countries. The more impact a country has, the more important the decisions made by that country are. Isn't it obvious?
Wtf are you talking about? The more important and felony crime would take priority. A cop nor anyone else would stop to think about this. Where are you getting these ridiculous questions?
Because nuclear technology are more expensive these days. Plus there is no nation in the world that has a nuclear reactor and not made nuclear weapons. Even Argentina did. What has Iran to do with Palestinians? Palestinians are arabs Iran is not. They are just muslim
Canada?
Obviously??If thats what you believe even when confronted by others with irrefutable proof!
truth hurst huh??Get use to it!!
I agree there's a point along those lines to be made, but as stated cave_dweller's claim is false.Japan too, and South Korea. I guess if you consider all three nations as being under the NATO nuclear umbrella that's less impressive.
Canada?
A hate filled propaganda hit piece from Masada.org is irrefutable proof?
Clearly, you live in an alternate reality, Bizzaro World.
Would you cooperate with an investigation whose results are pre-ordained? Or are you seriously arguing that the investigation will be handled objectively?
Japan too, and South Korea. I guess if you consider all three nations as being under the NATO nuclear umbrella that's less impressive.