At age 5, I'd argue that having a real firearm is not OK at all, regardless of the supervision. Children that age are not competent enough to handle deadly weapons.
Meh, I was taught proper handling and respect for a weapon around that age and never managed to harm anyone, or myself for that matter.
It seems you missed what exactly I was replying to.
I was "given" a .22 bolt action for my 5th birthday from my Grandpa. By "given" it really meant that it was hung unloaded, about 8' off the floor on a gun rack and I got to shoot it a couple times out in a pasture under very strict supervision of my Dad.
"Giving" a gun to a 5 year is different than letting them handle a loaded one, in the presence of other people/children and being completely bat shit retarded about it.
It seems you missed what exactly I was replying to.
Sounds like ages 4-5 are the most proficient at finding a loaded gun and accidentally shooting someone in the head.
Hey now, there was that 10 year old who was given instruction on how to use a full auto uzi at that gun show and he shot himself in the head due to the kickback, that was an epic fail.
This wouldn't have happened if the sister had a handgun of her own for self-defense.
5-year-old Kentucky boy fatally shoots 2-year-old sister
OK, I'm all for gun ownership, but what kind of insane idiot gives a 5-year old an actual working .22 rifle for his birthday rather than a BB gun or something??
No, I didn't miss anything. And you didn't answer my question.
I was taught to shoot at a young age, probably around 8 or 9 years old, with a .22 caliber bolt action rifle. I never had access to it unless my Step-Dad was with me and if I touched it when he wasn't around I'd get my ass whupped.
Another day in Kentucky. Mom was too busy reading her Bible to care, no matter. Pray for a couple days and it will be fine that was gods plan anyway.
Adult stupidty.
You're missing it Jules. He was replying to Pheran who said "regardless of supervision." Which is what you and apparently JMAggue had.
His post is kind of ambiguous. I thought it warranted commenting on.
A little bit. Maybe he should have bolded the part that said regardless of the supervision, but it was there. But, he did respond to you and bold out the area he was referring to. No need to bring up your question about whether his parents are complete fools.
im told by gun nuts that anything can be used to kill.
even if the parents had locked/hidden the guns, the 5 year old could killed with a knife or even a pencil.
5-year-old Kentucky boy fatally shoots 2-year-old sister
OK, I'm all for gun ownership, but what kind of insane idiot gives a 5-year old an actual working .22 rifle for his birthday rather than a BB gun or something??
Kentucky