Boston Man Gives Husband Gift Of Life

[imported_Phil]

Originally posted by: Patt

Originally posted by: Phil

Originally posted by: Patt
There is some serious bigotry in this thread ... and as someone else mentioned, I'm surprised it isn't locked. If you don't want to read gay threads, read the title before entering. Or, upon realizing what you're reading, instead of a knee-jerk reaction, simply click elsewhere. :|

This isn't bigotry, it's a bunch of people that are fed up with the militant homosexual crusader that is aidanjm. I'll click on whichever threads I want, thanks noobie.

Thank you for proving my point

Oh please, do explain yourself. I could do with a laugh.

 

[skace]

Originally posted by: Mo0o
The gay thing isn't that interesting. Whats cool is the man stopped taking his arthritic drugs to be able to be a donor. That's sacrifice.

That part fascinated me too but apparently 90% of the posters here are more interested in the fact they are gay?

 

[Ryan]

Originally posted by: rbrandon

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: BigJ
And why is this a big deal? Why is it newsworthy?

EDIT: And the bolded parts in your article are no reasons to justify this as being newsworthy.

I don't think it is necessarily news worthy, hence I didn't post it in P&N. It's more of a "human interest" story.

it doesnt interest this person, cockfag

:thumbsdown:

 

[chuckywang]

Originally posted by: Dragoon42

yea what part of rational is being gay when it requires a male and female to pro-create. To me that makes being gay pretty irrational. Let's see, continue our race, or stick something up where $hit comes from and not pro-create.... hrm....

I'm not saying that gay people are going to bring down the entire human race. But please don't ever say that you're rational and scientific thinking. There is nothing rational about being gay. You're just another fetish, but you've elevated your fetishness up a notch.

So I assume you're against impotent men and barren women from ever having a relationship? After all, they can't pro-create (sic) either.

 

[Ryan]

Originally posted by: chuckywang

Originally posted by: Dragoon42

yea what part of rational is being gay when it requires a male and female to pro-create. To me that makes being gay pretty irrational. Let's see, continue our race, or stick something up where $hit comes from and not pro-create.... hrm....

I'm not saying that gay people are going to bring down the entire human race. But please don't ever say that you're rational and scientific thinking. There is nothing rational about being gay. You're just another fetish, but you've elevated your fetishness up a notch.

So I assume you're against impotent men and barren women from ever having a relationship? After all, they can't pro-create (sic) either.

Exactly - Dragoon is working on fallacious reasoning. His argument against was torn to shreads.

 

[KoolAidKid]

Originally posted by: rbrandon

it doesnt interest this person, cockfag

:thumbsdown:

 

[thraashman]

Originally posted by: Phil

Originally posted by: Patt

Originally posted by: Phil

Originally posted by: Patt
There is some serious bigotry in this thread ... and as someone else mentioned, I'm surprised it isn't locked. If you don't want to read gay threads, read the title before entering. Or, upon realizing what you're reading, instead of a knee-jerk reaction, simply click elsewhere. :|

This isn't bigotry, it's a bunch of people that are fed up with the militant homosexual crusader that is aidanjm. I'll click on whichever threads I want, thanks noobie.

Thank you for proving my point

Oh please, do explain yourself. I could do with a laugh.

He's quite right. I noticed it too. There is a ton of blatant bigotry in this thread. All aidanjm is doing is talking about something that has become a political cause that is important to him. And many of you bigoted, self-righteous, jackasses rather than let him be attack him. It's sad how bad ATOT has gotten over the last several years.

 

[Zysoclaplem]

Aww that's sweet.