you are of course referring to the christian and islamic crutches ("organizations which don't want you to be free-thinking")... yes I do feel sorry for religious fundamentalists. fortunately those of us who do value science and rational thought are growing in number, and we recognize that there is no legitimate reason to discriminate against gay people in marriage or other areas of life.
you are of course referring to the christian and islamic crutches ("organizations which don't want you to be free-thinking")... yes I do feel sorry for religious fundamentalists. fortunately those of us who do value science and rational thought are growing in number, and we recognize that there is no legitimate reason to discriminate against gay people in marriage or other areas of life.
people are sheep when they follow a ludicrous and irrational doctrine (i.e., the fundamentalist christian perspective on homosexuality) simply because that is what they were taught as children. People who think for themselves are willing to subject the cultist christian ideology to rigorous questioning and inevitably they realize it is full of holes.
here's a rational thought for you.... Take two men... they try to pro-create. What happens? NOTHING!!!!!
here's another one: Why stick it in a place that excretes $hit?
that is correct: a male and female are required for procreation. And so..? Are you trying to make some point?
You might as well ask "why put a penis in a place for eating?" People do that because oral sex feels good. Similarly anal sex can be very pleasurable. This is hardly surprising - many parts of our body can serve multiple purposes. E.g., the mouth - can be used for eating, talking, expressing emotion, etc. and the mouth can be used in sexual activities.
last time I checked, eating gave our body nutrition. $hitting is excreting it. It's comparing apples and oranges.
yea what part of rational is being gay when it requires a male and female to pro-create. To me that makes being gay pretty irrational. Let's see, continue our race, or stick something up where $hit comes from and not pro-create.... hrm....
I'm not saying that gay people are going to bring down the entire human race. But please don't ever say that you're rational and scientific thinking. There is nothing rational about being gay. You're just another fetish, but you've elevated your fetishness up a notch.
What an idiotic response. Do you have even an inkling of just how stupid you are, I wonder?
The mouth is for eating, not for procreation. So WHAT IS THE POINT OF ORAL SEX? Can you even answer this question?
You asked: "Why stick it in a place that excretes $hit?"
My response is that anal sex can be highly pleasureable. that is why people engage in sodomy.
(And BTW, don't fool yourself that anal sex is uniquely a homosexual practice - many heterosexual couples engage in this practice. The % varies from culture to culture, for example in Brazil 80% of heterosexual adults acknowledge engaging in anal sex. The numbers are probably lower in the USA - nevertheless, the number of heterosexuals engaging in sodomy in the USA vastly exceeds the number of homosexuals engaging in this practice.)
I also point out that it is hardly surprising that people do this, given that our body parts often serve multiple roles.
I think it makes sense to be what you are. Around 10% of the population is born homosexual - there is no reason for these people to deny their same-sex attractions. The population argument is idiotic, given that
1) the world is grossly over populated as is,
2) there is no moral obligation for any given individual to reproduce anyway - there is no moral obligation to fvck and make babies, people DO actually have the right to remain childless if they so choose,
3) homosexuality is presumably built into our species via the process of evolution. There have always been homosexual individuals, and that has not prevented the human race from spreading across the globe. Clearly the human race is capable of survival despite having a steady 5-10% of its population sexually/ romantically attracted to individuals of the same gender. Interestingly, the latest research indicates that female relatives of male homosexuals are more fertile (they have more children) than women who do not have male gay relatives in the family. This suggests that the genetic factors leading to homosexuality in males are adaptive for the family they occur in.
For those of us who are born homosexual - about 5-10% of the population - it makes perfect sense for us to acknowledge our same-sex attractions and adopt a gay social identity. That is the reasonable, sensible, logical thing to do. What would be IRRATIONAL would be for us to live a life of self-denial and misery simply because people like you want us to. (Particularly considering you have no good reason other than "sh1t comes out of the anus" - sorry, but that is hardly a justification against homosexual sex). The survival of the human race is not dependent on our reproducing, as we make up only a small percentage of the population. Interestingly, our sisters and nieces tend to me more fertile than your female relatives (they have more babies) anyway.
So what about the sick 5-10% or even 1-2% that are born liking little children? Want them to go around raping little kids?
Or maybe you like animals? Wanna do a goat?
I don't care what you're attracted to or what you feel. Go tell your shrink about your feelings and attraction. Sure, you have no moral obligation to pro-create. But in the case that we do need to pro-create. It's not rational to be gay.
The world is overpopulated. Maybe gay people is mother nature's wrath.
Inspector Jihad
Lifer
- Apr 17, 2005
- 13,465
- 3
- 81
I feel sorry for such individuals. Nevertheless, they can never be allowed to act on their preferences (or illness - this is a matter for scientific debate) as doing so would inflict trauma on the child. It goes back to the idea of your freedom ending where my freedom begins - people don't gave the right to go around raping other people.
I personally have no interest in bestiality, and I do oppose bestiality for the same reason I oppose battery chicken farms - it's a practice that inflicts needless suffering on animals.
nevertheless, there is no particularly strong "mainstream" moral argument against this practice. You might say animals are unable to give consent to having sex with humans - but then again we don't ask animals for consent before turning them into our dinner or leather coat.
Sure you do. Otherwise you wouldn't be wasting time in this thread, spewing your incoherent nonsense.
Even that argument is idiotic. There is no necessary incompatibility between homosexuality and a desire to reproduce. You only need to have heterosexual sex once to make a baby. You don't even need to have heterosexual intercourse - you can donate our semen or eggs. Hence gay men donating their sperm to lesbians or heterosexual female friends. Etc.
Gay people are just part of the overall picture of human reproduction. Families do not require that every family member reproduces, a family line can still be successful in reproducing despite the presence of gay individuals within the family. In fact, gay individuals often assist in child rearing tasks within a family (e.g., babysitting after their neices and nephews) thus contibuting to the overall reproductive success of that family.
So what about the sick 5-10% or even 1-2% that are born liking little children? Want them to go around raping little kids?
[/quote]
I feel sorry for such individuals. Nevertheless, they can never be allowed to act on their preferences (or illness - this is a matter for scientific debate) as doing so would inflict trauma on the child. It goes back to the idea of your freedom ending where my freedom begins - people don't gave the right to go around raping other people.
I personally have no interest in bestiality, and I do oppose bestiality for the same reason I oppose battery chicken farms - it's a practice that inflicts needless suffering on animals.
nevertheless, there is no particularly strong "mainstream" moral argument against this practice. You might say animals are unable to give consent to having sex with humans - but then again we don't ask animals for consent before turning them into our dinner or leather coat.
Sure you do. Otherwise you wouldn't be wasting time in this thread, spewing your incoherent nonsense.
Even that argument is idiotic. There is no necessary incompatibility between homosexuality and a desire to reproduce. You only need to fvck once to make a baby. You don't even need to fvck - you can just jerk off in a cup and donate the semen to a fertile female. The rest of the time you can be as queer as you like. Hence gay men donating their sperm to lesbians or heterosexual female friends. Etc.
Gay people are just part of the overall picture of human reproduction. Families do not require that every family member reproduce, a family line can still be successful in reproducing despite the presence of gay individuals within the family. In fact, gay individuals often assist in child rearing tasks within a family (e.g., babysitting after their neices and nephews) thus contibuting to the overall reproductive success of that family.
[/quote]
Right...you can jerk off and the donate the semen. But again...you still need FEMALE. I think you missed the point there.
The kids thing, what about the few % of women that go around molesting those boys? There was the incident of the teachers molesting their 14yr old students. So would you stand up for this teacher? The boys obviously wanted to bone their teacher. So neither of their freedoms were violated. The 14yr old wasn't raped either, he willingly consented. It's just an attraction right? Nothing wrong with it?
Retards are also part of the overall picture of human reproduction, so are deformed babies. Just because gay individuals help in child rearing, doesn't mean hetero people don't. The fact that the family line ends with a gay person means that gay people don't contribute to the overall reproductive success of that family.
And I really don't care how you feel, it's the fact that you THINK (not feel) that it's rational to be gay.
Inspector Jihad
Lifer
- Apr 17, 2005
- 13,465
- 3
- 81
why dont gay people like vagina...i mean allright, you like the cock, but the vagina is wonderful...why dont they like it?
Whitecloak
Diamond Member
- May 4, 2001
- 6,074
- 2
- 0
Whitecloak
Diamond Member
- May 4, 2001
- 6,074
- 2
- 0
There is some serious bigotry in this thread ... and as someone else mentioned, I'm surprised it isn't locked. If you don't want to read gay threads, read the title before entering. Or, upon realizing what you're reading, instead of a knee-jerk reaction, simply click elsewhere. :|
This isn't bigotry, it's a bunch of people that are fed up with the militant homosexual crusader that is aidanjm. I'll click on whichever threads I want, thanks noobie.
So he refused his sister's kidney because it was too risky, but was willing to risk his husbands life. 
it doesnt interest this person, cockfag
One week vacation for you
Do it again and you are gone permanently
AnandTech Moderator
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter