• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Bernie Sanders

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
The only way Bernie could get anythings near what he proposes is to have a full democratic house and senate.
And even with that miracle, no doubt enough democrats in the house and senate would still derail Bernie's plan because too many democrats would be controlled by money and lobbyist.
The revolution Bernie wants to bring about would require bloodshed. Not just words.
Hillary on the other hand could and would continue to make progress.
Obamacare WITH a public option. Hillary could do that.
Smaller banks and less wall street influence. Hillary could do that.
A better more stable and much safer world. Hillary could do that.
Protect the rights of women and the LGBT community. Hillary could do that.
Hillary could do that without requiring a fully democratic loaded house and senate.
Bernie would need a totally democratic controlled congress, and even with that Bernie's chances would be 50-50 at best.
 
The only way Bernie could get anythings near what he proposes is to have a full democratic house and senate.
And even with that miracle, no doubt enough democrats in the house and senate would still derail Bernie's plan because too many democrats would be controlled by money and lobbyist.
The revolution Bernie wants to bring about would require bloodshed. Not just words.
Hillary on the other hand could and would continue to make progress.
Obamacare WITH a public option. Hillary could do that.
Smaller banks and less wall street influence. Hillary could do that.
A better more stable and much safer world. Hillary could do that.
Protect the rights of women and the LGBT community. Hillary could do that.
Hillary could do that without requiring a fully democratic loaded house and senate.
Bernie would need a totally democratic controlled congress, and even with that Bernie's chances would be 50-50 at best.

That's nonsense.....Utter bs you pulled from your ass!


Bernie's plan is to create a political revolution! If the corrupt members of congress won't sign off, the people replace them.

Assuming that doesn't happen, Bernie could get as much through as Shillary.

Less wall street influence, rofl!? She is their bottom bitch!

public option, wtf? She hasn't even mentioned anything that progressive, and there is no way she could start the negotiations at public option, and get it!

Women have more rights than men! What do they need protection from?

Safer world... lol I almost fell out of my seat... the war hawk Shillary?!!!



If Shillary had the full support of congress, she would still get less done for the people, than Bernie could with scotus picks and executive orders.


If Bernie loses the potus, any hope of getting our democracy back will require bloodshed. Hillary will absolutely see to that!
 
Last edited:
I hope Sanders gets the nod on the Democratic side. I will vote for him for president. If he gets elected I also hope that his plans get implemented so they cost this country incredible amounts of money, don't end up really helping anything (because they won't really screw just the rich, they'll screw everyone), and it will finally shut up all of his pie-in-the sky supporters who are so fucking naïve it's not even funny. I'll be happy to do that just to prove a point, so no snake oil salesman like Bernie ever comes along again.

Of course, even if the above happens another snake oiler will come along eventually again telling people exactly what they want to hear, but never able to actually fulfill their ridiculous promises. It's just human nature. People love to hear what they want to be told. There are too many suckers out there.

So, vote for Bernie...suckers.

99fdf71b159286cb0958cd3c65ce393f364276ba79b2c5ac15ef066d408d474f.jpg


Donald Trump. And I'll add your own quote..

telling people exactly what they want to hear, but never able to actually fulfill their ridiculous promises. It's just human nature. People love to hear what they want to be told. There are too many suckers out there.
 
99fdf71b159286cb0958cd3c65ce393f364276ba79b2c5ac15ef066d408d474f.jpg


Donald Trump. And I'll add your own quote..
Trump is a joke. Sanders is even a worse joke.

But morons like you don't even recognize that they are the same side of a different coin. Each merely tells their constituents exactly what they want to hear. Fools only recognize when it happens on one side but not the other.

Chug-a-lug the Kool-Aid on your side, fool.
 
Interesting video.

Sanders rakes Greenspan across the coals in 2003 and telling him he is out of touch with real people. Then, at the end, in 2008 Greenspan telling congress his model of how the world works was wrong...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJaW32ZTyKE

Hey, why worry about actual practice when the trickle-down/deregulate/Free-Trade theory works so great in theory?

Of course, ol' Greenspan was a Ayn Rand acolyte. So there's that.
 
Trump is a joke. Sanders is even a worse joke.

But morons like you don't even recognize that they are the same side of a different coin. Each merely tells their constituents exactly what they want to hear. Fools only recognize when it happens on one side but not the other.

Chug-a-lug the Kool-Aid on your side, fool.


You're about like Boberfett these days.

You pop in a lot and make a lot of insults without saying much of anything really.

I'm really not a reporting people type of person in general I guess, just not my style.
 
You're about like Boberfett these days.

You pop in a lot and make a lot of insults without saying much of anything really.

I'm really not a reporting people type of person in general I guess, just not my style.
Shake your pom-poms for one side all while imagining it's the one true way to believe. I don't really care. Nor do I care what your "style" is. Demmies and Pubbies both are morons and both sides are to blame for the stalemate that is politics today. The true believers from both sides should be lined up and shot and this country would be far better for it.
 
Shake your pom-poms for one side all while imagining it's the one true way to believe. I don't really care. Nor do I care what your "style" is. Demmies and Pubbies both are morons and both sides are to blame for the stalemate that is politics today. The true believers from both sides should be lined up and shot and this country would be far better for it.

I pretty much feel the same way about what you have to rant about to be honest, but just popping in and insulting people isn't very original.

You really didn't say much other than typing a bunch of abusive BS.
 
Cracked stuff is pretty damn funny. Sometimes my favorite parts are just the captions to pictures.

I check in there now and again, some of them are very well done.

Is one of my "look whats going on lately" spots 🙂

:thumbsup::thumbsup:
 
Shake your pom-poms for one side all while imagining it's the one true way to believe. I don't really care. Nor do I care what your "style" is. Demmies and Pubbies both are morons and both sides are to blame for the stalemate that is politics today. The true believers from both sides should be lined up and shot and this country would be far better for it.
Not only are you a BothSidesDoIt™ stooge, but you also think that anyone who doesn't agree with your views should be lined up and shot.

That's just brilliant, thanks!
I check in there now and again, some of them are very well done.

Is one of my "look whats going on lately" spots 🙂

:thumbsup::thumbsup:
I think I still have a favorites bookmark with a ton of Cracked articles like, "9 famous movie villains that were right", etc. Seriously though, the captions to the pictures get me laughing out loud for some of them.
 
Shake your pom-poms for one side all while imagining it's the one true way to believe. I don't really care. Nor do I care what your "style" is. Demmies and Pubbies both are morons and both sides are to blame for the stalemate that is politics today. The true believers from both sides should be lined up and shot and this country would be far better for it.

Yet you hate Bernie, the independent?!
 
You're about like Boberfett these days.

You pop in a lot and make a lot of insults without saying much of anything really.

Says the guy whose sole posting style for a while was to pop in, post an image to troll the thread, and then vanish...
 
Says the guy whose sole posting style for a while was to pop in, post an image to troll the thread, and then vanish...

You know better, but choose to go that way.

You like playing little games.

Not really any other way to put it, even after putting a bit of thought into it.

LOL, Libertarians 😛
 
Last edited:
That "independent" is running for the Democratic Party nomination. Even if you thought he was independent before you certainly can't now because he's not by definition.
So if a male labels himself as a female, do you then only consider him to be a female because he labeled himself so?
 
Not only are you a BothSidesDoIt™ stooge, but you also think that anyone who doesn't agree with your views should be lined up and shot.

That's just brilliant, thanks!
RIF

I said nothing about both sides do it (Like those making excuses for Hillary's email woes by claiming bbbb...but Bushies did it too!). What I said was both sides suck.

Nor did I say anything about people agreeing with my views. What I said was that the "true believers" of both sides should be lined up and shot and this country would be better for it.

Btw, "my views" is that there should be compromise in Washington by both sides. I know that terrifies a true believer like yourself, who wouldn't give an inch to the other side if their life depended on it. Keep goose stepping to the party fuhrer, kiddo.
 
RIF

I said nothing about both sides do it (Like those making excuses for Hillary's email woes by claiming bbbb...but Bushies did it too!). What I said was both sides suck.

Nor did I say anything about people agreeing with my views. What I said was that the "true believers" of both sides should be lined up and shot and this country would be better for it.

Btw, "my views" is that there should be compromise in Washington by both sides. I know that terrifies a true believer like yourself, who wouldn't give an inch to the other side if their life depended on it. Keep goose stepping to the party fuhrer, kiddo.
Yes. The person who wants people lined up and shot is a true American, and me, the person who is against the death penalty, is a huge authoritarian fascist NAZI.

What color is the sky in your delusional reality, chief? Thirteen? Hulahoop? Butter pecan?

Your ramblings are hilarious. Please proceed, lunatic.
 
Yes. The person who wants people lined up and shot is a true American, and me, the person who is against the death penalty, is a huge authoritarian fascist NAZI.

What color is the sky in your delusional reality, chief? Thirteen? Hulahoop? Butter pecan?

Your ramblings are hilarious. Please proceed, lunatic.
It's rhetoric. You should recognize that...your side is full of it.

Doesn't matter though, you'll take it and tap dance with it just like a moron would when it suits their purpose.

Dance moron, dance.
 
It's rhetoric. You should recognize that...your side is full of it.

Doesn't matter though, you'll take it and tap dance with it just like a moron would when it suits their purpose.

Dance moron, dance.

Rhetoric. Right.

Saying that people should be lined up and murdered is just rhetoric, from you and your side.

But MY side is full of rhetoric and stuff, so it's the exact same!!!

Your BothSidesDoIt™ tag is hanging out, chief.

Advocate for murdering your political opponents, authoritarian imbecile.
 
That "independent" is running for the Democratic Party nomination. Even if you thought he was independent before you certainly can't now because he's not by definition.
He is only running democrat, because it gives him the best chance to win the election. The system is totally rigged against 3rd party candidates! He would have no chance running as third party, or an independent.

All he would do by doing so is ensure Hillary loses, which he doesn't want. He likely realizes Hillary is bad for the country, but Cruz is slightly worse.
 
Last edited:
So if a male labels himself as a female, do you then only consider him to be a female because he labeled himself so?

That is the Democratic Party position and LGBT people are one of their core constituencies. It seems applicable to use the same standard whether it's sex or party affiliation.
 
That is the Democratic Party position, and it seems applicable to use the same standard whether it's sex or party affiliation.

Funny, I thought I asked you a question and not the Democratic party.

Do you consider a male who labels himself a female as a female simply because he labeled himself so? Just to be clear, I'm asking you.
 
Back
Top