LOL I tried to "weaponize" what you said? This is a debate on a public forum, if you can't handle some choice words when your information is off by several orders of magnitude, find a friendlier hobby? It's funny you keep accusing others of not reading your posts when we certainly have, and find your arguments wholly unconvincing. You don't understand how direct stimulus is paid for by the federal government, and you hand-wave about these new "equations" that would change everything. You also spend a lot of time putting words in my mouth which I never said or implied, which further erodes any argument that you could have.It's great that you ignored my apology about it being 1% of the national debt. The fact that you ignored that apology and chose to try and weaponize what I said, and throw it in my face shows what kind of person you are, and that you have no desire to even try to think past your own short slightness. Then go on to keep saying the same shit over and over trying to use the same equations and same numbers of today, thinking NOTHING would change. You think everyone would quit their jobs.. so their current income without the 1 Million would completely disappear, you think nobody would invest any of it, spend any of it, and it wouldn't generate any income taxes, that a million dollars to every adult wouldn't generate tax revenue outside of income, you think it would have zero effect on GDP, you think it would simply disappear in to thin air and have zero effect going forward on anything other than the debt side of things, and not generate income that would give it a return.. You have no clue what kind of return investing in people would actually bring.. This country and many of it's big businesses is built on doing just that. IN the end, you are just stuck in the "moment" and can't fathom that a net loss at the start would become a net positive in the years going forward. It's no different than investing in a business, that pays for itself after the initial investment.
As for the government doesn't have 255T laying around.. The government doesn't have any money laying around.. It hasn't had any real money since they got rid of the Gold Standard.. It's just paper printed up with nothing to back it. with much of it today just being 0's and 1' in the digital world.. Money is just a myth used to control citizens now days.. Not just in the US, but the world.
I don't blame you, Our society has never been built on investing in our citizens. It's always been built on knocking them down, controlling them, and keeping the majority poor. So you keep looking at everything the same status quo.
Edit: Also, you assume the 1 Million would be paid out in 1 lump sum.. Now realistically, if something like this was ever proposed, it should be paid over a set number of years, not all at once.
If I was trying to grow the U.S. economy for the long-term, the absolute last thing I would do is give everybody $1M. Anybody with a clue can already see it wouldn't turn out well (hint: most lottery winners go broke). I didn't even mention the most obvious side effect, which is that people would almost instantly quit all their low end jobs. With nobody willing to work at Walmart, the supermarket, or most service jobs for $15/hour, the economy would rapidly tank.
And way to move the goalpost. The "sportage economic plan" was specifically to give everybody $1M. If you want to debate something more like UBI, then you should be clear about it. You shouldn't pump up sportage's policy and now claim we're talking about a different proposal.
Anyway, I'm done with this topic. You make these blanket accusations that I'm short-sided and don't understand a different paradigm, yet you offer zero evidence supporting your positions. Nor can you counter obvious defects with the plan. I might as well believe in the Laffer Curve. Ostensibly, this thread is about BBB ($2T over 10 years, not $255T lol) so I'll let other people stay on topic.