Atlantic Ocean getting hot as hell - could be monstrous hurricane season

Page 19 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

yottabit

Golden Member
Jun 5, 2008
1,671
874
146
It has nothing to do with gambling.
They just need a much longer window than 5 days to dismantle a construction crane.

I can’t imagine just not attempting to take them apart

I mean sure, maybe PROPERLY dissassembling them would take a few weeks. But get a crew with some oxy-acetylene torches and I bet they could get it apart pretty quick.

Before anybody cries destructive disassembly would be expensive, how expensive is a toppled crane?

Also you wouldn’t need to completely dismantle it either, just do something to reduce the wind sail area

Strong “we tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas” energy

At least they advised neighbors to get out. Did anyone die as a result of the cranes?
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,131
17,861
126
I can’t imagine just not attempting to take them apart

I mean sure, maybe PROPERLY dissassembling them would take a few weeks. But get a crew with some oxy-acetylene torches and I bet they could get it apart pretty quick.

Before anybody cries destructive disassembly would be expensive, how expensive is a toppled crane?

Also you wouldn’t need to completely dismantle it either, just do something to reduce the wind sail area

Strong “we tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas” energy

At least they advised neighbors to get out. Did anyone die as a result of the cranes?


Umm what? Big metal pieces at high places that can only be reached with a bigger crane is not exactly something you want to willy ninny your way through.
 

yottabit

Golden Member
Jun 5, 2008
1,671
874
146
Umm what? Big metal pieces at high places that can only be reached with a bigger crane is not exactly something you want to willy ninny your way through.
My point is that it’s conceivable that either the construction company or the crane manufacturer could have some kind of rapid disassembly plan, that doesn’t involve trying to save the crane for reuse
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,363
16,634
146
My point is that it’s conceivable that either the construction company or the crane manufacturer could have some kind of rapid disassembly plan, that doesn’t involve trying to save the crane for reuse
The only rapid disassembly plan for a crane is 'it fell over'. At least if it falls over during a hurricane there aren't any idiots running around it. You also don't need to work through weeks of paperwork you don't have time for to get it approved. Act of nature and all that.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,039
136

Katie Nickolaou, a Michigan-based meteorologist, said that she and her colleagues have borne the brunt of much of these conspiracies, having received messages claiming there are category 6 hurricanes (there aren’t), that meteorologists or the government are creating and directing hurricanes (they aren’t) and even that scientists should be killed and radar equipment be demolished.

“I’ve never seen a storm garner so much misinformation, we have just been putting out fires of wrong information everywhere,” Nickolaou said.

“I have had a bunch of people saying I created and steered the hurricane, there are people assuming we control the weather. I have had to point out that a hurricane has the energy of 10,000 nuclear bombs and we can’t hope to control that. But it’s taken a turn to more violent rhetoric, especially with people saying those who created Milton should be killed.”

United States of Crazy
 

yottabit

Golden Member
Jun 5, 2008
1,671
874
146
The only rapid disassembly plan for a crane is 'it fell over'. At least if it falls over during a hurricane there aren't any idiots running around it. You also don't need to work through weeks of paperwork you don't have time for to get it approved. Act of nature and all that.
I guess my point is things are this way because we allow them to be. The crane example is probably a poor one to fixate on. But for now its economically viable to just let it topple over and let the insurance companies fight over the fallout. In the future as climate change progresses and this starts happening left and right that isn’t going to be a valid solution.

If everytime there is a problem like this our solution is to throw our hands on the air and say it’s better to just let it happen I don’t think we will survive as a species. Surviving climate change will require marvels of both engineering and determination.

To continue this example, once insurance companies stop covering these claims I’m guessing we’ll see the type of rapid (lets call it “hurricane preparedness”) contingency plans I’m talking about.

I’ll admit the image of a bunch of bayou boys crawling on the crane with their torches was a bit tongue and cheek and not productive 😅 but I can imagine a crane design that would allow for rapidly lowering it’s own counter weights, shortening the boom (even if it may cause permanent deformations or other damage to itself), basically a few key modifications that would drastically reduce the wind sail area and increase the wind rating, that could be executed by a crew working possibly 24/7 for a day or two. Doesn’t seem far fetched. Maybe it’s simpler to just have a rapid response plan to disassemble the whole thing if you’re operating in an area prone to hurricane, with teams that do drills to prove they can meet the warning time.

I’m just focusing on the crane because it’s emblematic of a larger issue I see. Obviously the other solution would be “stop building in these areas”
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,715
11,319
136
It's a cost/benefit analysis thing. There's very little to be gained in designing (an already uber complicated) piece of machinery to account for the minuscule chance that it might have to rapidly handle very specific emergency scenarios.
 

Dave_5k

Platinum Member
May 23, 2017
2,007
3,820
136
It's a cost/benefit analysis thing. There's very little to be gained in designing (an already uber complicated) piece of machinery to account for the minuscule chance that it might have to rapidly handle very specific emergency scenarios.
Especially when in doing so you would almost certainly be adding multiple weak points for other modes of failure into the design ~ by definition a less safe crane for normal use
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,297
47,464
136
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,039
136
Do NF/BNP chav assholes speak for the UK?
Weird response. Do you see _every_ issue through nationalist terms? More evidence for my sense that nationalism is all-pervasive among Americans.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,363
16,634
146
It's a cost/benefit analysis thing. There's very little to be gained in designing (an already uber complicated) piece of machinery to account for the minuscule chance that it might have to rapidly handle very specific emergency scenarios.
This, we're talking about tens of millions in development, design, implementation, and either modification or replacement of a fleet... for a crane casualty rate of 1/year at most?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie
Nov 17, 2019
13,294
7,875
136
I still think there should/could be a way to secure them for storms. Even if it means somehow lashing them to neighboring buildings.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,101
15,551
136
Well I guess all the ice melting into the ocean round the poles should cool shit right down again. Duh.

Typical leftish hysteria.
 

skyking

Lifer
Nov 21, 2001
22,760
5,921
146
@yottabit, you are indeed barking up the wrong tree. There is only one safe way to do it for the people doing the work. Take shortcuts and this is one of the results. I worked on that job at the base of that crane.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle_crane_collapse
Back to the premise that it takes weeks/days:
These are my pictures. This went up in a day while I was slinging forms with the truck crane nearby.
IMG_20190316_090125.jpg

IMG_20190316_090604.jpg
It takes two cranes, a small one pimping for the big one, and also two picking the jib assembly to get the pins in.
IMG_20190316_103645.jpg
it is easier to pin those sections together when both are hanging on a hook. That's my boss in the near left.
I had lunch with those guys and about a month later two of them were dead in that accident above. :(
So that thing about how long it takes? It really depends. If they have to climb it down because it is out of reach, add a few days. But if you can get a hook on it you can pull the counterweights, the jib, and the counter jib in a day.
But it requires good weather. See that accident above.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,581
46,215
136
I don't think rushing a crew to lower and dismantle a tower crane before a hurricane is probably safer than just leaving it up and hope for the best. It may not even be possible if there are a bunch of them.
 

DaaQ

Golden Member
Dec 8, 2018
1,988
1,433
136
you might get one or two before the winds are too strong to work, best case.
Plus, you cannot just start dismantling tower cranes every time a hurricane is forecasted. Too many variables on storm direction or travel.
Huge waste of money.

EDIT: sorry for the loss of your co-workers. I've lost a few myself. Ironically one was by an overhead rail crane.