Wait, what happened to smoothness being so awesome? I thought "slow and smoooooothhhh" was the way to go now? :awe:That conclusion makes zero sense.
Look at the numbers produced. Skyrim a draw when the average time of the 660 is clearly destroying the 7870?
Please...put someone on this who isn't stupid
Great find. I'm not surprised it's varying from situation to situation, as there's more going on here than just cards and drivers that impact the end result. It's clearly not vendor-specific despite nvidia fanboys foaming at the mouth for it to be so. Like I said earlier, I think an in-depth investigation with some great recording equipment will facilitate appreciating the end-result, which really is the interest here.
Um...did you even read what I said? You guys need to stop with your crap. You don't even read what people type, you just make up what you want it to say.
Didn't you see what game I mentioned? Didn't you see the specific I mentioned? No? You're blind then?
This is seriously getting ridiculous.
This entire thread is ridiculous, and should've been handled in pm seeing as it was just a question to Ryan anyway. But nah, make a public thread even though OP knew with 110% certainty that it was just going to be a flame fest![]()
So you're saying AMD drivers always had this higher latency and was not introduced with the introduction of the 12.8 drivers and my speculation was wrong?
Nope. He mentions 12.8s are slower than 12.11s but still exhibited the same latency problems.
If one goes back to the first GTX 660ti, where there was no apparent standing out by Techreport with the HD 7950 from a latency point-of-view -- they were using 12.7 beta.
Methods:
http://techreport.com/review/23419/nvidia-geforce-gtx-660-ti-graphics-card-reviewed/3
99th percentile:
http://techreport.com/review/23419/nvidia-geforce-gtx-660-ti-graphics-card-reviewed/11
This is why the latest testing was surprising for some and may be worthy of additional investigations.
AMD drivers SUCK. They always have and always will.
I don't agree with that, sorry!
GTFO.I can save you a whole lot of work.
AMD drivers SUCK. They always have and always will.
Nvidia may cost a little more but its worth it every time.
Then you have obviously never tried to run an AMD Cross fire setup.
Half the games dont in CF work for a long time after release. The drivers are basically Beta forever.
The stuttering is just another AMD screw up of its drivers.
Nope, I'm not saying this, you are. It's just more idle speculation on your part.
Still waiting for your data to show that latency got worse with 12.8. These attempts at distractions are cute but transparent.
Which still says nothing about latency getting worse with 12.8 versus older drivers, or latency getting worse in connection with improved frame rates. Seems like I was right not to bother wasting my time.
To Fx1,
Nvidia drivers suck. If you are writing a HLSL program that uses a 32 bit color format (RGBA) and you specify the R G and B, but leave the A blank. Nvidia will default it to 255. Typically in programming (like C) if you leave a variable blank it defaults to whatever is in memory, and in the case of basic languages, defaults to 0.
So Nvidia drivers suck because it can't get this right.
(whistles a tune)
Seriously though ive already stated in that post that all these questions are answered in that podcast.
Hence the word, "SPECULATION".
I'm speculating that the drivers got worse at 12.8 because I have no data on 12.7.
Sorry.
i plug in my GPU set the settings to SLI
And Guess What?
IT WORKS.
Good luck with AMD because i can tell you now its never as simple about 3 threads on this very forum prove my point
I have had identically positive crossfire experiences as I have had with SLI experiences. Who are you to say 'never' - have you tried hundreds of thousands of crossfire setups? No, I didn't think so. Extrapolating from a few threads to a universal is just absurd.
On the topic of the thread, and to get away from this camp-bashing nonsense, I would be one of the posters interested in seeing a factual and objective analysis done. If it is an incentive to AT, I think offering such an analysis would bring an enormous number of page hits to the website, so perhaps investing in the hardware may be offset at a reasonable stage.
I think just about the whole world knows AMD driver validation and performance is subpar and has been for ever.
You only need to understand how much money nvidia spends on driver development compared to AMD to understand why.
AMD used to be far cheaper than nvidia and people put up with sloppy drivers. Then AMD got big for its boots when they came out on top one year and their prices have rocketed but their drivers still suck.
i have owned both makers cards and consistently AMD is worse.
Oh well, I guess we got to the truth eventually. What a difference a day makes.
You have this data? Can you please provide us with this info if you have it?You only need to understand how much money nvidia spends on driver development compared to AMD to understand why
Have you only bought discrete cards after G80 came out? That would be the only explanation for that comment because there have been many times where AMD/ATI has had more expensive cards than nVidia ones...going all the way back to the 9700pro days IIRC.AMD used to be far cheaper than nvidia
Again, you only started buying discrete cards after G80? AMD/ATI has been on top more than just one year even after G80 came out.Then AMD got big for its boots when they came out on top one year and their prices have rocketed but their drivers still suck.
You have this data? Can you please provide us with this info if you have it?
Have you only bought discrete cards after G80 came out? That would be the only explanation for that comment because there have been many times where AMD/ATI has had more expensive cards than nVidia ones...going all the way back to the 9700pro days IIRC.
Again, you only started buying discrete cards after G80? AMD/ATI has been on top more than just one year even after G80 came out.
Guess ATF got the replacement Wreckage back from RMA... :\
