- Jan 16, 2003
- 21,219
- 56
- 91
When the 12.11's came out you speculated that the performance increase over 12.8 was because they were cheating. Originally you suggested it might be with AA. After the TR results you suggested they gave up smoothness for performance.
Now you want to go all the way back to the 6970? If we do, then taking TR's results, the 6970 stuttered worse than the 7950 and the 570 would have triggered epileptic fits.
Errmm. Going back to 6970 was actually a joke.
Ok bud, here is what I think.
AMD first started the fps campaign with possibly the 12.8s, introducing higher framerates over previous drivers but also introducing more severe hitching and stuttering/latency. It worked. Nobody picked up on it then. Accept maybe for Wasson. So before Wasson could finish his review, Intel calls Wasson and says "You can publish that NUC article anytime you want", and Wasson says, "Oh crap I have to finish it". Goes to finish it and publishes it. But, by that time, AMD announced the Never Settle driver beta and so Wasson tossed out all the 12.8 data. New Nvidia driver also by that time.
And it is possible, that AMD went even further with the same kind of optimizations to boost fps dramatically (and it was dramatic) and sacrificing the same latency as the 12.8s did.
I'm sure you didn't listen to the Podcast but all this information is there for you to hear.
You can try to look for discrepancies in my speculations from 12.8s to 12.11's forever. You won't find much as I've always maintained this opinion.
You are right though. Originally I DID suspect something was afoul when AMD's driver so dramatically boosted framerates and I speculated about it.
You probably took it as me posting a fact I'd imagine. Just as you thought I was literally saying we should go back to the 6970. Sheesh.
So that's my story dude. Take it or leave it. I just don't care. :|
