cubby1223, your are one of the prime ideologue residents here. I am quite aware that there is little chance of you to recognise rational sense, but for other viewers it bears repeating that the prime instigator of destabilising issues are of continued Israeli occupation and expansion. Rather than any plausible settlement, the state of Israel has a strategic desire to maintain the status quo with a divided and weakened Palestinian presence all to acquiesce its continued criminal expansion and
ethnic cleansing.
OF course the ethnic cleansing that awas attempted against Israel multiple times is not to be considered in the equation. Possibly if the Arabs and Palestinians had been tolerant of the original '48 borders, this would not be happening; however, multiple times; they showed that they wanted it all and every time ended up with less than they started with.
But that does not count, correct?
The Palestinian Authority is conducting a unilaterally peaceful, diplomatic, and just way forward with the advocation of civil disobedience in their occupied land against the aggressors, in combination with a route to achieve a semblance of state sovereignty and a gained UN seat to lobby for criminal charges and
further condemnation against Israel expansionist actions.
Just like LL, the use of just differs in the eye of the user. It is a great word to use, but difficult to actually define with exhibiting the true meaning/intent behind it's use.
Israeli action outside of its state borders fail a moral stiff test. A charged language is apt as the accurate parallels with history are damning indictments of Israeli state action:
- As Germany of the past, Israel has a state policy of lebensraum. Ironically, rather than Germanise lands beyond its border, Israel is applying its military to Zionise extra-territorial lands and displace its undesirable residents. "We are short of land, we are short of air, let us breathe in this country." Distasteful echoes of the past ring true today.
- Israel has long implemented policies akin to apartheid with militarily enforced separate areas and separate laws in the West Bank. Palestinians are subverted in favour of Israeli while only those Israeli colonists, rather than their subjugated Palestinian neighbours, are granted a political say upon state policy by Israel.
Condemnation upon Israel is not warranted out of its simply existence nor the presence of Jews, but of that state's extra-territorial criminal policies and actions. So, also please avoid a the expected trivial misrepresentation for no peace being achievalbe simply that due to hate for Jews or that myself, a Jew, gets-off "
Jew-baiting" by presenting comparisons to a convicted Germany...
🙄
If those in rabid and absolute defence of Israel will again likely cry with hyperbole over such applicable language, then I call for a new tact. Try avoiding the familiar arguments into
ad nauseum and Special Olympics style of attacks against internet messengers, and to contructively put an end to the likes of my vile language upon Israel. You can accomplish this via turning to a rationale course of action by pressuring Israel to cease
its condemnable actions.
That such aggression in favour of Israeli Zionist
is antagonistic ought ought to be fully reasonable to every honest witness. Do such high crimes warrant crimes of humanity attacks upon Israeli civilians? No. Yet those actions represent a minority of belligerents and most certainly do not give a pass to the continued and disproportionately greater instigating crimes by Israel.
Yet the actions of Palestinian leaders that bless such continued attacks and refuse to accept Israel as a state are considered to be justified and excusable.
