HamburgerBoy
Lifer
Originally posted by: dxkj
Originally posted by: Corporate Thug
think of it this way: it travels ~15x faster than you can
I can run 20mph
Aren't you the guy who claimed to have ran a mile in three minutes?
Originally posted by: dxkj
Originally posted by: Corporate Thug
think of it this way: it travels ~15x faster than you can
I can run 20mph
Originally posted by: Chompman
Maybe you are pointing the radar down there while your hand is busy... 😛
Originally posted by: Chompman
Originally posted by: dxkj
Originally posted by: Corporate Thug
think of it this way: it travels ~15x faster than you can
I can run 20mph
Sure you can...
Fastest record is from Michael Johnson and he came out to 10.35 m/s or around 23.15 and I would like to see you keep that up for 10 minutes. 😛
Maybe you are pointing the radar down there while your hand is busy... 😛
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
Originally posted by: dxkj
I can run 20mph
O RLY?
The world record for the 100 meter dash is 22mph.
Originally posted by: HamburgerBoy
Originally posted by: dxkj
Originally posted by: Corporate Thug
think of it this way: it travels ~15x faster than you can
I can run 20mph
Aren't you the guy who claimed to have ran a mile in three minutes?
Originally posted by: msparish
Originally posted by: Chompman
Originally posted by: dxkj
Originally posted by: Corporate Thug
think of it this way: it travels ~15x faster than you can
I can run 20mph
Sure you can...
Fastest record is from Michael Johnson and he came out to 10.35 m/s or around 23.15 and I would like to see you keep that up for 10 minutes. 😛
Maybe you are pointing the radar down there while your hand is busy... 😛
Johnson's top speed was well over that...that number is the average over 200 meters. I believe I remember Bob Costas saying during those Olympics, that when Johnson hit the straight portion of the track, he would hit just over 30 mph.
Edit: Although I still maintain Costas said that, it appears that the fastest instantaneous velocity of a sprinter is about 27 mph. Text
No, even a compact car weighs a ton-and-a-half. "Huge SUV's and trucks" can weigh 3 tons or more.Originally posted by: Chompman
I think she means since people are driving huge SUV's and trucks.Originally posted by: BigJ
Much more practical than other means of transportation.
Originally posted by: MS Dawn
It sounds absurd to have something that weighs a ton and a half (and often much more) to move around a person that weighs approximately 8 percent of one ton!
:Q
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: MS Dawn
It sounds absurd to have something that weighs a ton and a half (and often much more) to move around a person that weighs approximately 8 percent of one ton!
:Q
I agree. It's a very selfish & wasteful not to mention pollluting form of transport.
Kudos to those who walk, ride a bike, or ride public transport!
Originally posted by: MS Dawn
It sounds absurd to have something that weighs a ton and a half (and often much more) to move around a person that weighs approximately 8 percent of one ton!
:Q
Originally posted by: MS Dawn
Originally posted by: johnjohn320
Yeah..OP you live in NYC, where public transportation is everywhere. Many of the rest of us have no other practical way of getting from Point A to B.
Actually I'm in NYC less than two months a year and that figure goes down from there. 🙂
Originally posted by: RCN
Once you can teleport me to where I need to be I'll give up my car .....well I'd still want it for weekends.
Originally posted by: loic2003
motorbikes are hugely more paractical: think fuel economy, space taken on the road, parking, etc.
Bicycles use energy exerted 3x more efficiantly than if you're on foot.
Cars are safer, and better when it's pouring with rain...
Originally posted by: loic2003
motorbikes are hugely more paractical: think fuel economy, space taken on the road, parking, etc.
Bicycles use energy exerted 3x more efficiantly than if you're on foot.
Cars are safer, and better when it's pouring with rain...
Originally posted by: swtethan
Originally posted by: loic2003
motorbikes are hugely more paractical: think fuel economy, space taken on the road, parking, etc.
Bicycles use energy exerted 3x more efficiantly than if you're on foot.
Cars are safer, and better when it's pouring with rain...
cars are no doubt the winner..... get you there safely and quick
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
I'm commuting by bicycle once or twice a week.