The reason MS spits out dividends is because their growth slowed so much they were forced to. It's not because they're just generous execs.
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here anyway. It's not as if I'm trying to say you should buy AAPL today and not MSFT. In fact, I sold AAPL a long time ago because I though it was overvalued... long before AAPL even hit $200. However, in retrospect, I obviously sold this growth stock too early.
Where did I say they were giving the money back because they were "generous execs"? Please don't put words in my mouth.
"generous execs" have nothing to do with the div, in fact, it is the exec's fiduciary duty to release the cash.
A company is supposed to dividend when it does not have any projects for retained capital/cash that exceed the WACC of the company. If no projects exceed the hurdle rate, the cash is given back.
Slowing growth is a symptom of having no positive EVA projects, not the other way around. MSFT's current position is reflected by the P/E and Beta of the stock relative to AAPL. MSFT P/E is ~13, AAPL is ~21. Beta is .93 for MSFT, 1.5 for AAPL. This means that not only is AAPL riskier (beta can be used as a proxy), but it also has a far higher multiple (as most growth do compared to value) and reacts more to changing revenue projections.
At my prior job MSFT's treasurer visited my company to discuss how he invested a $60bn+ liquidity portfolio prior to the $32bn dividend, it was a pretty interesting discussion. At that point MSFT was almost more of a money manager than an actual software company.
Maybe AAPL is overvalued at 250. It wouldn't be the first time a stock kept going up despite unreasonable growth prospects.
However, it is safe to say MSFT's value is rather stable. Which company is preferable?