Being a big proponent of ergonomics at my workspace, and large monitors, the shear size of CRTs got me into always buying 'corner desks.' So.. right now, I have a corner desk and no real reason to buy an LCD since the CRT I have fits right into the corner..
I use a 19" LCD (1280, 1024) at work and a Sony G400 Trinitron CRT at home (1280, 1024) and I have to say I much prefer the look of the CRT.. To me, the CRT is 'soft' and the lcd is 'harsh.' I really notice this when using AutoCAD.
On my work computer, the LCD seems to obfuscate text under a certain size.. so I'm forced to zoom in farther than normal to read text in AutoCAD.. wheras the CRT displays text well no matter what the size in AutoCAD.
My G400 is hooked up with an analog cable (a quality shielded one) wheras my LCD at work is using a DVI cable (also a quality one)...
I always run LCDs in their native resolutions.. but while seeming crisp, I still cannot seem to prefer them for long-time use.
Anyone else think CRTs are just plain easier to look at?
I use a 19" LCD (1280, 1024) at work and a Sony G400 Trinitron CRT at home (1280, 1024) and I have to say I much prefer the look of the CRT.. To me, the CRT is 'soft' and the lcd is 'harsh.' I really notice this when using AutoCAD.
On my work computer, the LCD seems to obfuscate text under a certain size.. so I'm forced to zoom in farther than normal to read text in AutoCAD.. wheras the CRT displays text well no matter what the size in AutoCAD.
My G400 is hooked up with an analog cable (a quality shielded one) wheras my LCD at work is using a DVI cable (also a quality one)...
I always run LCDs in their native resolutions.. but while seeming crisp, I still cannot seem to prefer them for long-time use.
Anyone else think CRTs are just plain easier to look at?