Another fanatic, sharing Trump's hateful anti-Muslim rhetoric, commits murder

[umbrella39]

You almost filled out the whole SJW accusation Bingo card in a single post! Well done!
About the only point you've had to make is that anyone who disagrees with your dogma is, by default, a Trump-supporting, alt-right, bigoted, racist, limp-wristed, white, violent, weakling Christian male.
[slow clap]

“Freedom of speech and thought is not just for warm fuzzy ideas that we find comfortable, it’s for ideas that we find offensive,” Zakaria said. Then, noting that some Notre Dame students walked out on Vice President Mike Pence at their commencement, he took liberals to task.

"There is also an anti-intellectualism on the Left. An attitude of self-righteousness that says we are so pure, we are so morally superior; we cannot bear to hear an idea with which we disagree. Liberals think they are tolerant — but often they aren’t," he said.

T

You almost filled out the whole SJW accusation Bingo card in a single post! Well done!
About the only point you've had to make is that anyone who disagrees with your dogma is, by default, a Trump-supporting, alt-right, bigoted, racist, limp-wristed, white, violent, weakling Christian male.
[slow clap]

“Freedom of speech and thought is not just for warm fuzzy ideas that we find comfortable, it’s for ideas that we find offensive,” Zakaria said. Then, noting that some Notre Dame students walked out on Vice President Mike Pence at their commencement, he took liberals to task.

"There is also an anti-intellectualism on the Left. An attitude of self-righteousness that says we are so pure, we are so morally superior; we cannot bear to hear an idea with which we disagree. Liberals think they are tolerant — but often they aren’t," he said.

Seldom have I seen someone post some many keystrokes while saying absolutely nothing truthful or substantive....

Oh wait, that's wrong... I've been watching your shtick since around 2005 and watched sock puppet after sock puppet go down in flames only for you to just fire up yet another...

This lady doth protests FAR too much, methinks. Funny, I thought Kalyan was supposed to be a boys name... I guess I was wrong. That would explain your limp wristed beta cuckery however...

 

[umbrella39]

cowardly troll is cowardly

And yet another sock puppet has been tagged in!!!

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Kung-Fu master and potential Trump fanatic sets a record by pulling a helicopter with his genitals.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/kung-fu-master-uses-penis-10521866

 

[Grooveriding]

Fake news. This was obviously a liberal. It's well established Trump and his fanatics are lacking in the manhood department. #tinyhands

 

[Paratus]

Kung-Fu master and potential Trump fanatic sets a record by pulling a helicopter with his genitals.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/kung-fu-master-uses-penis-10521866

That's a pretty weird kink you got there. Though I'm not here to judge.

 

[dank69]

Perhaps we can try an experiment. Is the thread title "Another potential Muslim terrorist fanatic commits murder" acceptable to you for this thread? Not to me, the guy isn't an Muslim. He's also not a Trump supporter and didn't vote for him in the election according to his own Facebook posts. Give it a try, see what the response would be.

So not a lie then.

 

[UglyCasanova]

So where's the admins that love to swoop in to correct titles, or is it just mine lol? The guy was a Bernie supporter, but the thread says Trump fanatic.

This is the 4th time you have called us out in recent times. MD is the sole legitimate venue for such discussion, something you've been told again and again.

Perknose
Forum Director

 

[Grooveriding]

When I made the thread his alliances were unknown, it did say potential. Updated for accuracy.

 

[Younigue]

When I made the thread his alliances were unknown, it did say potential. Updated for accuracy.

Love it!

 

[UglyCasanova]

I thought we weren't supposed to jump to conclusions and stuff?

 

[FIVR]

So where's the admins that love to swoop in to correct titles, or is it just mine lol? The guy was a Bernie supporter, but the thread says Trump fanatic.

He was described as an avid Bernie Sanders supporter who harbored a deep hatred for Hillary Clinton, much like yourself. He claimed he supported and liked Trump, but didn't vote for him... also much like yourself (IIRC). Does looking in the mirror bother you? Is that why your avatar is a hideous goat-man?


I would hate to look in the mirror too, if I harbored similar beliefs to someone like the guy who committed these murders.

 

[brycejones]

So where's the admins that love to swoop in to correct titles, or is it just mine lol? The guy was a Bernie supporter, but the thread says Trump fanatic.

Oh you poor victim. They have a special forum for this kind of whining.

 

[greatnoob]

He was described as an avid Bernie Sanders supporter who harbored a deep hatred for Hillary Clinton, much like yourself. He claimed he supported and liked Trump, but didn't vote for him... also much like yourself (IIRC). Does looking in the mirror bother you? Is that why your avatar is a hideous goat-man?


I would hate to look in the mirror too, if I harbored similar beliefs to someone like the guy who committed these murders.

Also don't forget, old man @Doc Savage Fan who has constantly thrown himself under the bus to defend Trump, his 'policies' and the dumb shit he's said at all costs, despite him saying he didn't for Trump. Oh and of course, let's not forget about @buckshot24.

Lying and being willfully ignorant seems to be a trend for these folk. Is it cognitive dissonance or are they just scum?

 

[Vic]

The media loves this latest non-story, and they are pushing their agenda as hard as possible. Just look at this shit from HuffPo:

Trump Had Over 20 Chances To Address The Portland Attack On Twitter Before He Did So





Why are they claiming that assaulting someone for mouthing off makes one a hero? That makes them criminals, and though I'm not defending Joseph Christian, I don't feel an ounce of pity for those idiots. Why the fuck does President Trump need to address this? If anything, he should be condemning those that took the law into their own hands. This bullshit needs to stop. Their agenda is on full display.

Seek help.

 

[Victorian Gray]

He was described as an avid Bernie Sanders supporter who harbored a deep hatred for Hillary Clinton, much like yourself. He claimed he supported and liked Trump, but didn't vote for him... also much like yourself (IIRC). Does looking in the mirror bother you? Is that why your avatar is a hideous goat-man?


I would hate to look in the mirror too, if I harbored similar beliefs to someone like the guy who committed these murders.

Ouch.

 

[Victorian Gray]

Seek help.

I think he already found what he was seeking.

 

[HomerJS]

Just ask yourself this one question. What effect does the rhetoric coming from POTUS have on our political climate. There are only 3 possible answers.

A. Negative
B. Positive
C. No effect

 

[brycejones]

Just ask yourself this one question. What effect does the rhetoric coming from POTUS have on our political climate. There are only 3 possible answers.

A. Negative
B. Positive
C. No effect

Left out MAGA

Fail!

 

[xthetenth]

Your average "progressive" is more like a meme!

Real life equivalent:

...and yet THEY are the ones who mock US???

The hilarity of someone who pretends to be rational and above name calling making this post is almost enough to mask the profound sadness of the stunted man trapped inside using any method, no matter how hypocritical, to rationalize away having to actually think about the world he lives in and what he is complicit in. I'm almost starting to wonder if there's something really dark in there, like he'd have to own up to having committed rape or something similar if the people he calls mentally diseased were right about consent. Notice how it's always deflections based on rhetorical positioning, a carefully cultivated image of SJWs as hysterical and overemotional and calling out perceived hypocrisy through a willing blindness to satire. He doesn't use his own words to engage with the things he disagrees with because he can't. He has to use other people's words because he's conditioned himself to use cognitive shortcuts to dismiss things that pressure his worldview.

 

[Paratus]

You know, you CAN talk about the problems of the religious/political power structure of ISLAM without referring to its followers, muslims, directly.

Just like discussing Christ and Christianity, not specific (or groups of) Christians. I don't know why I have to keep saying this... I know I'll have to keep repeating it too - it never sinks in.

You have to keep repeating it because it's not what you do:

Your average "progressive" is more like a meme!

Real life equivalent:

...and yet THEY are the ones who mock US???

Does this look like discussing the problems of a group?

 

[Vic]

I think he already found what he was seeking.

The most offensive part of the self-defense false narrative that he's pushing is that the assailant slashed their throats after stabbing them.

 

[Blue_Max]

The hilarity of someone who pretends to be rational and above name calling making this post is almost enough to mask the profound sadness of the stunted man trapped inside using any method, no matter how hypocritical, to rationalize away having to actually think about the world he lives in and what he is complicit in. I'm almost starting to wonder if there's something really dark in there, like he'd have to own up to having committed rape or something similar if the people he calls mentally diseased were right about consent. Notice how it's always deflections based on rhetorical positioning, a carefully cultivated image of SJWs as hysterical and overemotional and calling out perceived hypocrisy through a willing blindness to satire. He doesn't use his own words to engage with the things he disagrees with because he can't. He has to use other people's words because he's conditioned himself to use cognitive shortcuts to dismiss things that pressure his worldview.

Hilarity, indeed. You're now insinuating I'm a rapist. Classy! I'd put that kind of wild accusation firmly in the "hysterical and overemotional" category, as you put it.

Just like the students of Evergreen at this very moment. Yep. Another bunch of college marxists gearing up to riot against non-existent "oppression".

You don't have a leg to stand on.

 

[xthetenth]

Hilarity, indeed. You're now insinuating I'm a rapist. Classy! I'd put that kind of wild accusation firmly in the "hysterical and overemotional" category, as you put it.

Just like the students of Evergreen at this very moment. Yep. Another bunch of college marxists gearing up to riot against non-existent "oppression".

You don't have a leg to stand on.

Yep, scattershot, touchy tone policing and a random example of something that you're trying to put into an overarching conspiracy that you're nobly opposing. This is so predictable.

Last I checked morbid fascination wasn't an emotional response, by the way, so we can scratch that tone argument out. You're really defensive, more so than most, is it any wonder if I question whether or not you're hiding something truly nasty? Other people aren't framing themselves as warriors for a natural order of things against crazed and irrational thugs the way you do, and given the broad brush you're using, you're probably defensive about something pretty basic to the stated views of what you consider SJWs.

You haven't actually said no, I'll note. Can you firmly state that all sex you have had was consensual and that you haven't attempted to coerce anyone into having sex with you? If you want to clearly and affirmatively state that you think that consent consists of a clear and affirmative yes, I'll drop this line of questioning though, since you haven't consented to it.

It might just be that you think there's a natural order of things that white men are at the top of and that you're fighting against a modern desire to pervert this hierarchy. Who knows? I doubt I will until I prod the right bit and you snap.

 

[agent00f]

He was described as an avid Bernie Sanders supporter who harbored a deep hatred for Hillary Clinton, much like yourself. He claimed he supported and liked Trump, but didn't vote for him... also much like yourself (IIRC). Does looking in the mirror bother you? Is that why your avatar is a hideous goat-man?


I would hate to look in the mirror too, if I harbored similar beliefs to someone like the guy who committed these murders.

It's pretty obvious the situation when the same reliably parties are here to protect this racist bigot's cause:

The media loves this latest non-story, and they are pushing their agenda as hard as possible. Just look at this shit from HuffPo:

Trump Had Over 20 Chances To Address The Portland Attack On Twitter Before He Did So





Why are they claiming that assaulting someone for mouthing off makes one a hero? That makes them criminals, and though I'm not defending Joseph Christian, I don't feel an ounce of pity for those idiots. Why the fuck does President Trump need to address this? If anything, he should be condemning those that took the law into their own hands. This bullshit needs to stop. Their agenda is on full display.

You know, you CAN talk about the problems of the religious/political power structure of ISLAM without referring to its followers, muslims, directly.

Just like discussing Christ and Christianity, not specific (or groups of) Christians. I don't know why I have to keep saying this... I know I'll have to keep repeating it too - it never sinks in.

So where's the admins that love to swoop in to correct titles, or is it just mine lol? The guy was a Bernie supporter, but the thread says Trump fanatic.

 

[Blue_Max]

drivel drivel drivel
You haven't actually said no, I'll note. Can you firmly state that all sex you have had was consensual and that you haven't attempted to coerce anyone into having sex with you? If you want to clearly and affirmatively state that you think that consent consists of a clear and affirmative yes, I'll drop this line of questioning though, since you haven't consented to it.

While this doesn't deserve a response, I'll give one anyway. Yes - 100% clear and affirmative consent every time, even by today's utterly ridiculous set of new female-biased rules. (eg: Both drunk? He's guilty, she's "raped" because he can always give consent, even when unconscious, and she apparently can't.)
And a huge, fat, flying, FAWK YOU for the implication of otherwise. Your basis for the accusation? Because I hold the "wrong" opinions, thus simply must be a rage-filled rapemonger... just have to be. *progressivefeelz*