• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

An important message from a LINUX user

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
I posted this in offtopic for a reason, If I wanted a flame/Insults war I would have went somewhere else .

I was just pissed at this developer's statement about malware and spyware as mentioned above, that I

felt the need for a rant nothin big, wasn't expecting a total reaction for the penguin $hit statement.

But I ended up with all this wow. thx guys, keep it coming

Ah, now we try to take the high road. How old are you again? Are you even of legal age to agree to a EULA? Seriously, you made some pretty ignorant blanket statements in the OP. I can secure a Windows box and make it just as secure or more so than any Linux or Unix box. Again, how a computer/server is administrated and protected is FAR MORE IMPORTANT than the OS running on it. It's clear you've never worked in a real IT environment a day in your life.
 
If you wanted to post a rant with some serious replies with people who feel the same as you, you would have posted to the correct forum or as another poster posted slashdot.org, I would not be surprised if you do have a userid on there.
 
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
All these replies but everyone is turning a blind eye towards the developers comments , thats ok.

thanks for agreeing that there is no reason to have an argument considering this...you should go and post it on slashdot..the epitome of highly civilized discussions
 
Who cares. In every other industry, the leaders are quickly copied and near-replicas put up on the shelf beside them. I expect MS to do no less than to take the best ideas they can find and implement them into their latest product. I sure as hell do that for my own software.
 
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
All these replies but everyone is turning a blind eye towards the developers comments , thats ok.

Fact is, you're talking out your ass. Vista isn't slated for release for another year and a half, so to make such bold comments as you did about an OS that isn't even released yet is assinine in and of itself.

Hey, while I'm at it, I'll go ahead and say that the Federation startship USS Enterprise slated for construction in 3010 won't be able to go warp speed. Just thought I'd get that out there.
 
Originally posted by: yllus
Who cares. In every other industry, the leaders are quickly copied and near-replicas put up on the shelf beside them. I expect MS to do no less than to take the best ideas they can find and implement them into their latest product. I sure as hell do that for my own software.

QFT
 
Originally posted by: halik
because KDE or GNOME have more to offer.... 20 years after apple lisa and i still cant copy and paste between evolution and firefox...

You can copy and paste between ANYTHING on Linux. Ever use that middle clicker, or wonder what it's for? Just for grins, highlight something, and copy it. Then go to where you want it to be (heck, even text in a terminal window) and CLICK THE MIDDLE BUTTON (click the mouse wheel, dude.)

Whoa! Check it out!

 
Originally posted by: LinuxIdiot
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
All these replies but everyone is turning a blind eye towards the developers comments , thats ok.

thanks for agreeing that there is no reason to have an argument considering this...you should go and post it on slashdot..the epitome of highly civilized discussions


WTF, why you keep refering me to slahdot.org I am here , then why the F not have a discussion on it, I was planing on having my post as just a little rant @offtopic and I thought it would be apparent, nothing taking to the max level of seriousness.

But since you guys took me seriously answer me about the developers comments concerning malware and spyware does that mean I can use Windows Vista without spending $ 300 on immunizing it and the rest of my life patching it day by day for major critical security holes , if that is true than I will be one of the 1st to buy it, I $hit you not.
 
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
does that mean I can use Windows Vista without spending $ 300 on immunizing it and the rest of my life patching it day by day for major critical security holes , if that is true than I will be one of the 1st to buy it, I $hit you not.

Hey man, I feel your pain. Just relax. Everything is going to be alright. You don't have to convert the world.
 
Where the hell do you go to spend 300 bucks to "immunize" windows 😕 patches are a normal part of life be it security or miscellaneous updates for the software/OS.

What bout their comments concerning malware/viruses are you having problems with?
Windows Vista security features protect against the latest generation of threats, such as worms, viruses, and malware. And in the unlikely event of a successful attack, Windows Vista ensures that the damage is minimal.

I dont see what you are sitting here bitching about? They say they have made improvements to limit these kind of things and you are bitching about it?
 
Um does it really surprise you that they finally lifted the GUI?

Hell, some of the DOS programs in XP are from FreeBSD, didn't even bother to change the switches. BSD license allows this anyway so it's a moot point.

Point is, yes Mac OSX and even Gnome2.0 look almost exactly like Vista will from the beta screenshots.. but who cares? Is it really that big of a deal to be an elitist and make sure people know that you were "OG" when that GUI was on some obscure production release of Gnome2? I've been using a Mac skin theme for years on XP.. because I like the way it looks.

Also who the hell is arguing over gaming on Linux ... are you one of those people that thinks Linux can replace the AVERAGE user's desktop? lol.
 
Originally posted by: randalee
Originally posted by: halik
because KDE or GNOME have more to offer.... 20 years after apple lisa and i still cant copy and paste between evolution and firefox...

You can copy and paste between ANYTHING on Linux. Ever use that middle clicker, or wonder what it's for? Just for grins, highlight something, and copy it. Then go to where you want it to be (heck, even text in a terminal window) and CLICK THE MIDDLE BUTTON (click the mouse wheel, dude.)

Whoa! Check it out!

what you're talking about is the functionality of the X window system and has absolutely nothing specific to do with linux.
 
I won't argue that maybe in the future it may be able to replace windows as desktops but if the phone calls I get from users is any indication I wouldnt bet on holding my breath for that to happen.. Hell half the time you say desktop and people get lost..I mean what does that say for computer users? Can you imagine that same type of person on linux I already feel sorry for anyone that has to currently troubleshoot a complex problem on windows can you imagine that same sort of problem being troubleshot on linux? Omg...
 
Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
Originally posted by: randalee
Originally posted by: halik
because KDE or GNOME have more to offer.... 20 years after apple lisa and i still cant copy and paste between evolution and firefox...

You can copy and paste between ANYTHING on Linux. Ever use that middle clicker, or wonder what it's for? Just for grins, highlight something, and copy it. Then go to where you want it to be (heck, even text in a terminal window) and CLICK THE MIDDLE BUTTON (click the mouse wheel, dude.)

Whoa! Check it out!

what you're talking about is the functionality of the X window system and has absolutely nothing specific to do with linux.

Thats great and all but what bout standards? Why in one application can I copy and paste using certain standards but going to another application I have to use another key/mouse combination to do the same thing? I may be wrong its been at least a year since I last worked on anything in linux though.

 
Originally posted by: randalee
Originally posted by: halik
because KDE or GNOME have more to offer.... 20 years after apple lisa and i still cant copy and paste between evolution and firefox...

You can copy and paste between ANYTHING on Linux. Ever use that middle clicker, or wonder what it's for? Just for grins, highlight something, and copy it. Then go to where you want it to be (heck, even text in a terminal window) and CLICK THE MIDDLE BUTTON (click the mouse wheel, dude.)

Whoa! Check it out!

there are two separate and most of time inoperable clipboards - one provided by x11 (highlight-middle click) and the other one provided by your favorite WM. Thats a problem seeing as all the contextual menus copy to the WM clipboard, which doesn't necessarily work with all apps. The last version of evolution i had didn't let me do ctrl-c ctrl-v, but rather highlight and click. Try pasting that into firefox address bar when theres a url there already. When you click there, it will highlight the current url, which means you lose your clipboard....

And don't even get my started on drag on drop....

FYI:
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by: LinuxIdiot
Where the hell do you go to spend 300 bucks to "immunize" windows 😕 patches are a normal part of life be it security or miscellaneous updates for the software/OS.

What bout their comments concerning malware/viruses are you having problems with?
Windows Vista security features protect against the latest generation of threats, such as worms, viruses, and malware. And in the unlikely event of a successful attack, Windows Vista ensures that the damage is minimal.

I dont see what you are sitting here bitching about? They say they have made improvements to limit these kind of things and you are bitching about it?


Wow, the puzzle is coming together, you do fit your name (the Linux part must be excluded), you seem the type of guy that will buy everything he notices in an add on TV, so you were trying to convince me by linking to a microsoft website that claims the following :

"Protection from malware
IT departments and individual users spend significant time and resources solving problems caused by malware as well as trying to detect and prevent problems before they happen. Windows Vista includes powerful features that can prevent, detect, and remove malware before it causes problems. The result: improved computer performance, fewer support calls, and improved security."

Ok, you need some therapy, that wasn't the 1st time microsft promises added security and other typess of BS.

Originally posted by: randalee
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
does that mean I can use Windows Vista without spending $ 300 on immunizing it and the rest of my life patching it day by day for major critical security holes , if that is true than I will be one of the 1st to buy it, I $hit you not.

Hey man, I feel your pain. Just relax. Everything is going to be alright. You don't have to convert the world.

I am not trying to convert not even one person. I am just sick of idiots like that LinuxIdiot dude, that is hypnotized by M$ but I tried, they don't realise how much they spy on them, how they are getting ripped off,
If I pay for WinXp and figured I need to change some hardware in my PC I have to beg a fcking representative God knows in what country, to activate my OS that I paid for that's total bull.
whats next do I have to work for M$ for food and water ?

and for those guys saying that windows can be made as secure as Unix and Linux, well jeez after spending a ton loads of money on software, and days of internal tweakings it better be safe.
 
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Originally posted by: Chrono
please don't lie to him about gaming support for linux. linux sucks for games.
i work with linux systems all the time and i refuse to run cedega(wine) to play games that'll run at 1/4 speed of what it does in windows xp. on the otherhand, linux r0x for everything else... not multimedia related. ;p

Originally posted by: five40
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: jndietz
i would convert to linux in a heart beat but i would have to spend a week learning the nooks and crannies of it, being the windows user i am. i'm seriously contemplating it.... arg i want to so bad.

good luck... linux on desktop is pretty horrible...


What !!! you think you are insulting me or something? I dont give 2 $hits what you use it doesn't benefit nor harm me, it's a matter of personal choice and I respect that. That is why I have this thread in the off topic because I don't have any intentions of going technical nor transforming this thread into another " Why you should convert to Linux/ Linux vs Windows Article" to the already existing quadrillion articles and blogs out there.

haha insulting you? Start drinking decaf, kid.
You're the one freaking out about bill gates and whatver other bs you think someone is stealing from open source. I use unix about 95% of all time i spent using computers and Linux is about as unproductive as a desktop can get.

I'm willing to bet you're a teenbopper kid that loaded up mandrake on your pc and now you think you're "1337" because you go around blabbering how linux is great and how bill gates is the antichrist. Grow the fvck up :roll:

Chris Jones is fckin lying

Chris Jones : You will not get spyware and malware on your computer anymore.

Interviewer : Why not?

Chris Jones : Because we have great Anti-Malware/Spyware support built into the system!!!

The Linuxator : ; turns off BS alarm; -------------> at this instant the need for a rant on AT was absolute.

its the same BS over and over , at least I will not pay a cent if I did't like what I am getting from Linux.

Will you please shut up. As a linux user myself...you are a moron. Nothing is more secure than anything else unless you unplug it from the internet and reduce the userbase to 1 person. If linux where as popular as windows, everyone would b!tch about how crappy the security is on linux. Look at the IE, Firefox battle. Everyone complained about IE and said how great and secure Firefox is. Before Firefox was popular there where almost NO security updates. Now that it's semi-popular, geeeee lots and lots of security releases. Yes, Firefox is still better, but they still don't have much market share compared to IE. The same thing will happen linux if the day ever comes when it is more popular.

And as you claim, if MS is stealing from Apple, then they will get sued. If their are similarities, big f'in deal. I want you to write a program and come up with completely original ideas every time.


NO YOU STFU, I just had enough $hit form devolopers promising BS to the average user, and hey if Linux becomes as popular as windows, it's not the same BS , windows is weak by archecticture not by being exposed to popularity, they started realsing that everytime they get some hot competetion from opensource, and thats why they started preventing the users from becoming Admin of the local system just like that an example of hot piping competetion would be firefox, and yes in programming you can come up with ideas and thats why patents still exist its because there are still people out there that are not cloners, so what would you say about firefox, IE 7 was a failed clone, they didnt even bother coming up with ideas for years.
They just sat down waited for the mozilla guys to finish up the work, and just copied down.
So a bunch of developers with a public support make firefox the ultimate webbrowser yet, but MICRO$OFT the biggest software corporation in the world didn't even move a finger untill they felt that FF might be be burning them aive.
That my friend is called fighting the greedy a$$holes you watch raping ppls privacy, by spying on them,, and the right to get your money's worth out of software, not get kicked around by instabilities, and having to patch my OS like tire that fell over a box of nails.

Please, learn something about security before stating any statments regarding security. EVERYTHING is weak by architecture. Linux has plenty of weak architecture elements to it. For example you need to use OpenBSD (solaris as well) in order to have a system with a non-executable stack (if you even know what that is). Having an executable stack is one monster architecture flaw. Also the numerous security issues with syscalls. Oh yes, and how long has it taken to get threading in linux? Would you like me to go on? Yes, I prefer linux over windows, but it's not perfect.
 
Originally posted by: junkerman123
you should make a blog about why linux is good, and windows sucks. and then people around the world will read it and convert to linux!

yeah!

rofl :laugh:
 
Sorry to dissapoint you but I dont spend my time buying everything I see in the ads on television.

You dont have to like what I posted but guess what every company makes promises that end up being incorrect or someone finds a way around what the company promised. Guess what again I must say I dont really care. As long as I can get it to work the way I want I am fine with that. The reasoning behind my username is when I first was playing around in linux I had to go to www.linuxquestions.org to ask some questions and felt like an idiot, you can see it anyway that you want.
 
Originally posted by: jndietz
i would convert to linux in a heart beat but i would have to spend a week learning the nooks and crannies of it, being the windows user i am. i'm seriously contemplating it.... arg i want to so bad.

dual boot is the answer my friend
 
Originally posted by: five40
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Originally posted by: Chrono
please don't lie to him about gaming support for linux. linux sucks for games.
i work with linux systems all the time and i refuse to run cedega(wine) to play games that'll run at 1/4 speed of what it does in windows xp. on the otherhand, linux r0x for everything else... not multimedia related. ;p

Originally posted by: five40
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: The Linuxator
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: jndietz
i would convert to linux in a heart beat but i would have to spend a week learning the nooks and crannies of it, being the windows user i am. i'm seriously contemplating it.... arg i want to so bad.

good luck... linux on desktop is pretty horrible...


What !!! you think you are insulting me or something? I dont give 2 $hits what you use it doesn't benefit nor harm me, it's a matter of personal choice and I respect that. That is why I have this thread in the off topic because I don't have any intentions of going technical nor transforming this thread into another " Why you should convert to Linux/ Linux vs Windows Article" to the already existing quadrillion articles and blogs out there.

haha insulting you? Start drinking decaf, kid.
You're the one freaking out about bill gates and whatver other bs you think someone is stealing from open source. I use unix about 95% of all time i spent using computers and Linux is about as unproductive as a desktop can get.

I'm willing to bet you're a teenbopper kid that loaded up mandrake on your pc and now you think you're "1337" because you go around blabbering how linux is great and how bill gates is the antichrist. Grow the fvck up :roll:

Chris Jones is fckin lying

Chris Jones : You will not get spyware and malware on your computer anymore.

Interviewer : Why not?

Chris Jones : Because we have great Anti-Malware/Spyware support built into the system!!!

The Linuxator : ; turns off BS alarm; -------------> at this instant the need for a rant on AT was absolute.

its the same BS over and over , at least I will not pay a cent if I did't like what I am getting from Linux.

Will you please shut up. As a linux user myself...you are a moron. Nothing is more secure than anything else unless you unplug it from the internet and reduce the userbase to 1 person. If linux where as popular as windows, everyone would b!tch about how crappy the security is on linux. Look at the IE, Firefox battle. Everyone complained about IE and said how great and secure Firefox is. Before Firefox was popular there where almost NO security updates. Now that it's semi-popular, geeeee lots and lots of security releases. Yes, Firefox is still better, but they still don't have much market share compared to IE. The same thing will happen linux if the day ever comes when it is more popular.

And as you claim, if MS is stealing from Apple, then they will get sued. If their are similarities, big f'in deal. I want you to write a program and come up with completely original ideas every time.


NO YOU STFU, I just had enough $hit form devolopers promising BS to the average user, and hey if Linux becomes as popular as windows, it's not the same BS , windows is weak by archecticture not by being exposed to popularity, they started realsing that everytime they get some hot competetion from opensource, and thats why they started preventing the users from becoming Admin of the local system just like that an example of hot piping competetion would be firefox, and yes in programming you can come up with ideas and thats why patents still exist its because there are still people out there that are not cloners, so what would you say about firefox, IE 7 was a failed clone, they didnt even bother coming up with ideas for years.
They just sat down waited for the mozilla guys to finish up the work, and just copied down.
So a bunch of developers with a public support make firefox the ultimate webbrowser yet, but MICRO$OFT the biggest software corporation in the world didn't even move a finger untill they felt that FF might be be burning them aive.
That my friend is called fighting the greedy a$$holes you watch raping ppls privacy, by spying on them,, and the right to get your money's worth out of software, not get kicked around by instabilities, and having to patch my OS like tire that fell over a box of nails.

Please, learn something about security before stating any statments regarding security. EVERYTHING is weak by architecture. Linux has plenty of weak architecture elements to it. For example you need to use OpenBSD (solaris as well) in order to have a system with a non-executable stack (if you even know what that is). Having an executable stack is one monster architecture flaw. Also the numerous security issues with syscalls. Oh yes, and how long has it taken to get threading in linux? Would you like me to go on? Yes, I prefer linux over windows, but it's not perfect.

Nothing is perfect ,and yes you look like you know more than me when it comes to Linux, well let me tell you I haven't been using Linux all that long at all , but it just feels good to know that you are independent of the biggest monopoly in the world. diid you check the security issues in firefox , did you see how fast they where discovered and how fast they were patched a new update was out of the door just like that , so yes Linux and opensource based apps aren't perfect. But they are sure safer because it doesn't take a year for each issue too get fixed up and thats if it gets fixed.


 
Back
Top