Are you talking about that guy that said that AMD would be destroyed by ARM from below and Intel from above?
All in all, you remind me of someone from beyond3d forums (was it juanrga?).
Never listening to facts presented by others, always spinning your own tale, no matter how little sense it makes.
Just wait until you find his alternative physics textbooks, ooh boy!!!!!!!!
Internet Strongman reference sighted! Batton down the hatches! Sound the alarms! We are not prepared for an incursion by Internet Strongman juangra!
Made in Russia?Just wait until you find his alternative physics textbooks, ooh boy
Because Juan is such a famous, quintessentially Russian nameMade in Russia?
Just wait until you find his alternative physics textbooks, ooh boy
Why is it so big
Google AI overview scolds me (gaslights me?) & says no such socket as FF5 exists
Never mindGoogle AI overview scolds me (gaslights me?) & says no such socket as FF5 exists
- Mobile socket names:AMD has used many mobile BGA sockets over the years. Recent BGA platforms include:
- FP5: Used by early mobile Ryzen 7 and other processors in the Ryzen 7000 series, like the Ryzen 7 2700U.
- FL1: Used by high-performance mobile parts, including the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.
- FP7/FP7r2: Used for Ryzen 7000 and earlier series mobile processors.
- Strix Point/Strix Halo: The latest series of mobile processors use BGA sockets and are often cited by their codenames.
More confirmation from Google searchNever mind
![]()
Leaks Suggest AMD AM5 Future Support for Ryzen 9000G "Gorgon Point" & EPYC 4005 "Grado" CPUs
PC hardware watchers continue to pore over official AMD repositories and adjacent databases, in the hopes of finding unannounced next-gen technologies. Olrak29 and InstLatX64 have presented their latest Team Red-related findings; apparently reaching across futuristic desktop, mobile, and...www.techpowerup.com
yeah same swimlane as Van Gogh (that one was FF3 iirc).Using the never-before-seen FF5 socket

The socket size is almost entirely down to pin count, which is driven by how much I/O is on the chip. This probably just means that FF5 has fewer PCIe lanes.View attachment 131952
I have asked Gemini to overlap FF5 and STX FP8: Soundwave total package is about 86.4% of STX: most likely due to better power efficiency (STX has to draw up to 54W to support turbo boost). And please check the table I created in the frontpage. As I said, Soundwave is the successor of STX to compete with Apple M5 and Qualcomm's X2. So please don't believe in non-sense specs of 2P+4e and 4 RDNA3.5 CU with improved ML from MLID...
| ARM SoC | Node | Die Size | TDP | Memory Interface | CPU | Max Speed | GPU | GPU Speed | NPU | 5G Modem | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensity 9500 | N3P | 140 mm2 | ~14W | 64-bit LPDDR5x | 1+3+4 8-core C1 | 4.21 GHz | 12-core G1-Ultra | 100 TOPS | Integrated | ||
| M5 | N3P | ~ 180 mm2 | ~14-22W | 128-bit LPDDR5x | 4+6 10-core | 4.61 GHz | 10-core Apple G17G | 1.62 GHz | 40 TOPS | NA | |
| Soundwave | N3P | ~ 200 mm2 | ~20-28W | 128-bit LPDDR5x | C1 12-core ? | RDNA4.5 12CU? | 80 TOPS | Integrated ? | |||
| X2 Elite | N3P | 287 mm2 | ~35W | 128-bit LPDDR5x | 6+6 12-core Oryon v3 | 4.7 GHz | X2-80 20CU | 1.7 GHz | 80 TOPS | Integrated | |
| X2 Elite Extreme | N3P | 287 mm2 | ~50W | 192-bit LPDDR5x | 12+6 18-core Oryon v3 | 5 GHz | X2-90 24CU | 1.85 GHz | 80 TOPS | Integrated |
Any link — for AMD Arm apu ordered by MSCharlie post/leak about the "Socket that QCOM lost" (AMD custom Arm APU ordered by MS


Okay we can safely disregard the rest thenMLID leaked:

| Controller | STX PCIe 4.0 | Qualcomm X2-EE | PTH-H 12Xe | Soundwave / M5? | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PA | 1 PCIe Gen4 | 1 PCIe Gen5 | 1 PCIe Gen5 | |||
| 2 PCIe Gen4 | 2 PCIe Gen5 | 2 PCIe Gen5 | ||||
| 3 PCIe Gen4 | 3 PCIe Gen5 | 3 PCIe Gen5 | PCIe Gen5 x 4 SSD | |||
| 4 PCIe Gen4 | 4 PCIe Gen5 | 4 PCIe Gen5 | ||||
| 5 PCIe Gen4 | 5 PCIe Gen5 | |||||
| 6 PCIe Gen4 | 6 PCIe Gen5 | |||||
| 7 PCIe Gen4 | 7 PCIe Gen5 | |||||
| 8 PCIe Gen4 | 8 PCIe Gen5 | |||||
| PB | 9 PCIe Gen4 | 9 PCIe Gen5 | 5 PCIe Gen4 | |||
| 10 PCIe Gen4 | 10 PCIe Gen5 | 6 PCIe Gen4 | ||||
| 11 PCIe Gen4 | 11 PCIe Gen5 | 7 PCIe Gen4 | PCIe Gen4 x 4 SSD / Thunderbolt 4 | |||
| 12 PCIe Gen4 | 12 PCIe Gen5 | 8 PCIe Gen4 | ||||
| 13 PCIe Gen4 | 13 PCIe Gen4 | 9 PCIe Gen4 | Wi-Fi + BT | |||
| 14 PCIe Gen4 | 14 PCIe Gen4 | 10 PCIe Gen4 | SD Card Reader | |||
| 15 PCIe Gen4 | 15 PCIe Gen4 | 11 PCIe Gen4 | RJ45 GBE | |||
| 16 PCIe Gen4 | 16 PCIe Gen4 | 12 PCIe Gen4 |
Why does Apple still keep Neural Engine in M5?XDNA3 For SWV (~80 TOPS) and Medusa Premium (~110 TOPS)
MLID leaked: Soundwave's NPU is very powerful. What does it mean in technical term? Hoho, I think I managed to calculate how powerful is upcoming XDNA3 below:
View attachment 132486
The TOPS are depending on the amount of MAC units x Frequency. It is so simple to calculate; that's why all OEMs are not willing to share the MAC units and clock speeds. Luckily, we got leaks about M4's NPU clock speed @ 2364MHz and AMD XDNA1's clock speed @ 1.3GHz. That's why I could complete my calculation above. STX's XDNA2 TOPS has been tripled due to doubling of MAC units and clockspeed.
The upcoming Soundwave will double the MAC units to 16384, the same as Medusa Premium. Thanks to MLID, we know Medusa Premium's SoC could have up to 110 TOPS: that's mean AMD will clock the MAC units up to 3.4GHz @ 6W. By reducing the frequency down to 1.4GHz, XDNA3 TOPS could have been down to 46TOPS @ 1.2W. Soundwave's NPU should be clocked at least 2.44GHz to meet the requirement of upcoming Windows Co-pilot, which is similar to 2.364GHz of M4's NPU because they are both target at same market.



