AMD Ryzen (Summit Ridge) Benchmarks Thread (use new thread)

[CatMerc]

Ryzen looks like cheap Haswell-E, not anything even closely resembling 7700k.

Nothing wrong with just cheap Haswell-E in my book though.

Architecturally I'd say it's more a hybrid of Skylake and Ivy Bridge than anything.

 

[OrangeKhrush]

Time to go watch movies, this convo is going ot go south again.

 

[lolfail9001]

You realize that single thread performance of ryzen is very close 7700k? You are fail here.

~10% behind per clock and ~10% behind on 24/7 clocks (on current rumor cycle). 20% behind is not "very close".

Architecturally I'd say it's more a hybrid of Skylake and Ivy Bridge than anything.

It has some stuff from cat/con cores too, though.

 

[CatMerc]

@inf64 Re-run the test with PT8, I got 31.1. That's a bit more reasonable

Still, classic WCCFTech.

 

[CatMerc]

~10% behind per clock and ~10% behind on 24/7 clocks (on current rumor cycle). 20% behind is not "very close".

It has some stuff from cat/con cores too, though.

Keller knows best

 

[Shivansps]

 

[Doom2pro]

@inf64 Re-run the test with PT8, I got 31.1. That's a bit more reasonable

Still, classic WCCFTech.

Shoot first ask questions later, aka get the story out first, fix it later (if ever).

 

[CentroX]

~10% behind per clock and ~10% behind on 24/7 clocks (on current rumor cycle). 20% behind is not "very close".

.

Those numbers are simply incorrect vs flagship ryzen. It is at most %10 behind with 1800X

 

[bakyt115]

from reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5uu91c/ryzen_5_1600x_33ghz_cinebench_r15_benchmark/

 

[CatMerc]

No source provided. Amazing.

 

[bakyt115]

No source provided. Amazing.

any way. looks legit for me.

 

[inf64]

Yep it does . I will post in New Zen thread a summary of what this result might mean(IMO) Vs other cores(AMD/intel)

Edit: Done.

 

[lolfail9001]

Those numbers are simply incorrect vs flagship ryzen. It is at most %10 behind with 1800X

I look at passmark, do 3 divisions and come to 8.3% number. Reported air clocks are 4.3-4.5 for Ryzen, 4.8-5 for Kaby, 4.9/4.4 = 11. 1.08*1.11=1.1988~20% ahead.

Do the math, boy.

No source provided. Amazing.

Looks legit still.

 

[PhonakV30]

hmm win 8 ? I thought Full potential Is possible only under win 10.

 

[CatMerc]

Don't get me wrong, the score looks within my expectations, and I don't see anything obviously fake about it. I just really dislike when people just post pictures like that with no explanation.

 

[Lovec1990]

hmm win 8 ? I thought Full potential Is possible only under win 10.

it could be so if its true it means 1600X is better than this bench showed

 

[GroundZero7]

Sorry but I had to adblock OrangeKrush's new avatar...couldn't handle it.

Was like seeing a black widow hanging from my monitor. Couldn't even read his posts ; ;

 

[richierich1212]

hmm win 8 ? I thought Full potential Is possible only under win 10.

Cinebench shows Win 8 but in reality it's Win 10. My Cinebench R15 result shows the same on my Win 10 laptop with i5-6300u:

 

[Sven_eng]

Guys you might want to compare Haswell single thread score to Skylake score in Passmark.

http://www.passmark.com/forum/performancetest/5691-4790k-vs-6700k-single-threaded

 

[SPBHM]

I3 4360 3.7ghz CB 149
Ryzen r5 1600x 3.7ghz CB 146

http://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/...yzen-5-1600X-Cinebench-R15-Benchmark-Leak.png
So there you have it...lower IPC compared to haswell...obviously way higher multiscore and lower price will help Ryzen overcome this...

this is margin of error stuff, if this result is real I think that's really impressive for AMD, really far above what I expected when Zen rumors started, and combine that very decent ST performance with cheaper moar cores+HT and you have a winner.

 

[lolfail9001]

Guys you might want to compare Haswell single thread score to Skylake score in Passmark.

Just did, 4790k has 6% higher IPC than 4770k.

 

[richierich1212]

Just did, 4790k has 6% higher IPC than 4770k.

Two Haswell chips? One devil's canyon?

 

[lolfail9001]

Two Haswell chips? One devil's canyon?

Yep, PassMark totally does not lie.

 

[The Stilt]

hmm win 8 ? I thought Full potential Is possible only under win 10.

Based on my own experience, Windows 7 performs slightly better than Windows 10 (even on Ryzen).
Even with most of the bloatware disabled.

 

[unseenmorbidity]

No source provided. Amazing.

What source do you expect!? Wccftech? Lol

it's from a guy that leaked the naming scheme long ago and no one believed him.