AMD Ryzen (Summit Ridge) Benchmarks Thread (use new thread)

[richierich1212]

Yep, PassMark totally does not lie.

Sorry I don't get what you're trying to say. All I know is that the 4790K base speed is 4GHz with 4.4GHz turbo while the 4770K is 3.5GHz base with 3.9GHz turbo.

 

[GroundZero7]

Based on my own experience, Windows 7 performs slightly better than Windows 10 (even on Ryzen).
Even with most of the bloatware disabled.

IMO benchmarks should be run on W10 LTSB N

That way nothing will EVER interrupt anything EVER

 

[itsmydamnation]

We already know Passmark CPU score is very heavily influenced by Memory latency and bandwidth. I dont know why people are trying to take "IPC" means for this data without first normalizing for memory performance.

What people should be doing it trying to find comparable system configurations.

 

[inf64]

Anyone seen Sweepr lately?
He last updated this thread on 23rd Dec 2016. Since then zero updates and we have had some very positive signs for Zen's performance. I wonder if the topic would have been updated if we saw some crappy results .

 

[The Stilt]

IMO benchmarks should be run on W10 LTSB N

That way nothing will EVER interrupt anything EVER

Windows 10 is the test environment.

 

[lolfail9001]

Sorry I don't get what you're trying to say. All I know is that the 4790K base speed is 4GHz with 4.4GHz turbo while the 4770K is 3.5GHz base with 3.9GHz turbo.

I took 4.5Ghz 4770k and 4.8Ghz 4790k, actually.

We already know Passmark CPU score is very heavily influenced by Memory latency and bandwidth. I dont know why people are trying to take "IPC" means for this data without first normalizing for memory performance.

Passmark single threaded score does not use any of heavily influenced subtests.

 

[inf64]

I took 4.5Ghz 4770k and 4.8Ghz 4790k, actually.

Passmark single threaded score does not use any of heavily influenced subtests.

From David @ Passmark forum:

The single thread test only uses one test thread and rates the computers performance under these conditions. The single thread test is an aggregate of the floating point, string sorting and data compression tests.

Also this:

Note3: The threaded test also includes a small amount of single threaded code (it is 89% threaded and 11% single threaded).

 

[Doom2pro]

IMO benchmarks should be run on W10 LTSB N

That way nothing will EVER interrupt anything EVER

Like windows update sitting idle between 2am to 6am and then going full bonkers at 2PM right while I'm using the machine?

 

[OrangeKhrush]

Preordered a 1600X and X300 board

 

[Doom2pro]

Preordered a 1600X and X300 board

Hopefully not from a Chinese website... You'll get an Athlon XP 1600 with a VIA KT333 motherboard

 

[CatMerc]

What source do you expect!? Wccftech? Lol

it's from a guy that leaked the naming scheme long ago and no one believed him.

That wasn't him, I've seen that picture before when he posted it on reddit.

 

[OrangeKhrush]

Hopefully not from a Chinese website... You'll get an Athlon XP 1600 with a VIA KT333 motherboard

Nope, from friends in useful places. but have to wait a while.

 

[inf64]

Hopefully not from a Chinese website... You'll get an Athlon XP 1600 with a VIA KT333 motherboard

I LoLed so hard, thanks for that

 

[GroundZero7]

Hopefully not from a Chinese website... You'll get an Athlon XP 1600 with a VIA KT333 motherboard

Or 2 empty boxes..

 

[OrangeKhrush]

So the 1800X CB R15 MT

1136 x 8/6 * 3.4/3.6 = 1431.......that SMT

 

[inf64]

So the 1800X CB R15 MT

1136 x 8/6 * 3.4/3.6 = 1431.......that SMT

I think the 6C ran at 3.45Ghz in that test, so you should mul with 3.6 and div with 3.45. That is *IF* that 6C score that was leaked is legit.

 

[Doom2pro]

Or 2 empty boxes..

Possible, but they love to get rid of stuff, so it could be filled with electrolytic capacitors matryoshka doll style.

 

[OrangeKhrush]

I think the 6C ran at 3.45Ghz in that test, so you should mul with 3.6 and div with 3.45. That is *IF* that 6C score that was leaked is legit.

Close enough

 

[Shivansps]

So the 1800X CB R15 MT

1136 x 8/6 * 3.4/3.6 = 1431.......that SMT

Why you keep beliving they run Ryzen test whiout turbo enabled? that makes no sence at all. Could be true for ENG sample, but these arent eng samples anymore. On top of that, if its a X, the XFR may be pushing clocks a bit more.

 

[zinfamous]

Anyone seen Sweepr lately?
He last updated this thread on 23rd Dec 2016. Since then zero updates and we have had some very positive signs for Zen's performance. I wonder if the topic would have been updated if we saw some crappy results .

good point. He was insta-updating when all of the fake benches that gave Ryzen a poor show. Like, without fail.

But he's not biased. never was. He's still liking the expected posts, though. also without fail, on a daily basis.

 

[inf64]

Why you keep beliving they run Ryzen test whiout turbo enabled? that makes no sence at all. Could be true for ENG sample, but these arent eng samples anymore.

They run the test with 6C/12T ES @ stock. From the OPN string and the CPUz images we can see it was 3.3Ghz(3.45Ghz ACT) and 3.7Ghz ST Turbo. There is no mystery.

good point. He was insta-updating when all of the fake benches that gave Ryzen a poor show. Like, without fail.

But he's not biased. never was. He's still liking the expected posts, though. also without fail, on a daily basis.

Oh he is here then. Nice to know he is still reading . Dunno if he is happy though.

 

[Shivansps]

They run the test with 6C/12T ES @ stock. From the OPN string and the CPUz images we can see it was 3.3Ghz(3.45Ghz ACT) and 3.7Ghz ST Turbo. There is no mystery.

The 1600X XFR enabled run ACT at just 3.45Ghz? i dont buy it, i dont belive 3.7Ghz ST either.

 

[inf64]

The 1600X XFR enabled run ACT at just 3.45Ghz? i dont buy it, i dont belive 3.7Ghz ST either.

That is NOT 1600X, it has never been.

 

[OrangeKhrush]

Why you keep beliving they run Ryzen test whiout turbo enabled? that makes no sence at all. Could be true for ENG sample, but these arent eng samples anymore. On top of that, if its a X, the XFR may be pushing clocks a bit more.

You can turn it all off, plus I trust him because he is a professional, he said it was a stock clock validation run

 

[Doom2pro]

That is NOT 1600X, it has never been.

I don't think any ES had XFR enabled, let alone Turbo? So trying to call those ES's X models is laughable... I can't recall any ES's being discovered with those features enabled, but if someone wants to correct me that's fine.