Well, I think that depends. If you want efficiency and a "cooler" (heat wise) CPU, you would get eh 2700x. The 8700K may be faster when OC'ed, but its toasty. And its not as efficient on power usage. Oh, and its platform is dead, and any new CPU (as you pointed out) would be on a new motherboard.build a 2700x or wait for z390 and 8790k ? i am tingling to update my 4770k
The best what ? The 2700x has more cores and is supposed to be close or better than the 8700k at stock. But games ? still no real benchmarks out. The 2700x has more cores, but still may not OC and beat the 8700k. What is your first priority ? and if you are that worriedm wait until later this weeks when official benchmarks show up.it's not about money or getting new parts, i just want the best. I already have a 1080ti with a 27in Acer predator 2560x1440p
Just put the results here, you can even do pics.
Sorry, but I couldn't help thinking Coffee Lake the whole time I was reading your post. Lol. The irony!Higher CPU clocks, lower latencies of cache and memory controller, improved turbo, better compatibility of RAM and also support of faster/higher clocked RAM.
No Titan V? No 4k 144Hz?it's not about money or getting new parts, i just want the best. I already have a 1080ti with a 27in Acer predator 2560x1440p
i don't think you are serious, more like sarcastic, but the 1080ti does everything gaming wise a titan V would do. and 4k? hmm, never really thought about it. The acer predator already does 144hz OC to 168hz.No Titan V? No 4k 144Hz?
The Titan V isn't worth the premium for gaming in my opinion. 4k 144Hz monitors will probably be priced in the same range. There's a big difference between 1440p and 4k. There's a lot more pixels to push at the higher refresh rates, I don't think a 1080Ti would be able to handle the higher refesh rates at 4k Ultra settings.i don't think you are serious, more like sarcastic, but the 1080ti does everything gaming wise a titan V would do. and 4k? hmm, never really thought about it. The acer predator already does 144hz OC to 168hz.
I guess we'll get some more info on when 2800x will be released when the NDA lifts and the news comes out ?
We don't have a lot of sample yet. But based on this video and El Chapuzas "review", unless the process significantly improves, it doesn't seem very likely that we'll get a 2800x (at least not as a Ryzen, maybe as a Threadripper). Hardware Numb3rs chip needed between 1.45-1.5v for 4.3 GHz. El Chapuzas got 4.2Ghz @1.456v, 4.3 was not stable. There doesn't seem to be all that much headroom left.From what I read, the 2700x is the highest clock new Ryzen to be released.
build a 2700x or wait for z390 and 8790k ? i am tingling to update my 4770k
I probably will, started doing some initial tests tonight, and as I suspected, rumors that more cores != better gaming performance aren't holding water even for older games. Going to pick up an 8700k or whatever Intel's best sub 1k chip is around July/August and take a closer look. Sure, you can compare stock to stock, but as I suspected, there are a ton of holes in testing at pretty much every review site...especially those of us who actually game at max settings and decent (1440p+) resolutions. To be clear, I'm not a fan of either camp, but I see a lot of influence on both sides, so I am working on a system to clear that up once and for all. Any review site not using at least a 1080ti loses my respect instantly. If you are going to spend $350 on a top of the line CPU, why would you buy a 1060 for a GPU? I just don't get it. we'll find out. I'm going to be digging deep. Some of my stuff will have to be on a dedicated website because I am buying hardware outright and need to fund that initiative. If I could get away with it, I'd post it all here and/or go ad free. However, I am going to have a system in place to deal with that. I mean no disrespect to AT, but this whole review system has to change.
Well, I think that depends. If you want efficiency and a "cooler" (heat wise) CPU, you would get eh 2700x. The 8700K may be faster when OC'ed, but its toasty. And its not as efficient on power usage. Oh, and its platform is dead, and any new CPU (as you pointed out) would be on a new motherboard.
Now, granted, the 2700x comes out also with a new motherboard, but its just a little better in some things, the current 370 boards will work fine with a bios update.
build a 2700x or wait for z390 and 8790k ? i am tingling to update my 4770k