• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

AMD GPU14 Tech Event Sept 25 - AMD Hawiian Islands

Page 26 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
XYUHd05.jpg


About time.
 
Well thats 2 hours of my life down the toilet

The fact that they dont give any actual performance info (lolfirestrike) means it wont even match Titan, or they would be all over it

And rebadges, really? [redacted]

Profanity isn't allowed in the technical forums.
-- stahlhart
 
Last edited by a moderator:
XYUHd05.jpg


About time.

This is going to be the norm for devs to cater to next gen consoles, weak multi core CPU need all their cores used else the game will run like crap. That in turn, means PC users will finally get to enjoy many well threaded games out of the box, we can crank settings to max and know that our CPU is not being useless.
 
XYUHd05.jpg


About time.

Like the CPU is gonna make or break BF4. 😀
Oh great, you gained 2FPS with support for 8 cores 😀


Well thats 2 hours of my life down the toilet

The fact that they dont give any actual performance info (lolfirestrike) means it wont even match Titan, or they would be all over it

And rebadges, really? [redacted]
Yeah, if they beat Titan they would have shown the slides and scores by now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't believe you guys are watching that nonsense, 1 minute was enough for me to peace out. I'll just wait for the TL'DR tomorrow on whatever website I happen to visit.
 
Like the CPU is gonna make or break BF4. 😀
Oh great, you gained 2FPS with support for 8 cores 😀



Yeah, if they beat Titan they would have shown the slides and scores by now.

You obviously don't play BF3 currently. You can have a 4.5GHz 2500K sit at 90% CPU in 64 man matches.
 
Oh man, these guys need to attend toastmasters for crying out loud. This director from EA is an absolute mess.
 
oh, [redacted], that Mantle bzns just made the industry a bit more interesting. and dice in on it, too? well, well...

Profanity isn't allowed in the technical forums.
-- stahlhart
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's going on with the "ghetto" speak in this thread? Did talking/typing like a normal person go out of style in the past 5 minutes?
 
So, open standards are not relevant anymore as long as AMD has an advantage? Got it.

At least it will stop the talk about GPU-PhysX and how unfair it is.
 
What's going on with the "ghetto" speak in this thread? Did talking/typing like a normal person go out of style in the past 5 minutes?

sorry, haha, that Mantle stuff really got me excited. so many implications and possibilities...

and I was reading some fairly ghetto stuff while following blogs on this, so it just came naturally.
 
Like the CPU is gonna make or break BF4. 😀
Oh great, you gained 2FPS with support for 8 cores 😀

You obviously don't know what you're talking about. BF3 64 man conquest absolutely kills your CPU. Unless you're up around 5ghz with an i5 you're CPU bottlenecked a good portion of the time. i7s have a significant advantage in BF3 and it seems that advantage will be increased in BF4. With 8 core support AMD machines should finally be up to par as well.
 
So, open standards are not relevant anymore as long as AMD has an advantage? Got it.

At least it will stop the talk about GPU-PhysX and how unfair it is.


Stop, we don't need another locked thread in your honor.
 
Back
Top