Okay TS, I havn't seen one of these machines or whatever so its a little hard for me to visualize but I'm trying. In any case, if the ballot could be mis-aligned for Gore voters it could also be mis-aligned for Bush, Buchannon, Nader, et al. correct?
<< ...stating there dismay that they may have accidently voted for Buchanan because he was the 2nd hole to punch and Gore was the 3rd hole. You recall punching the 2nd hole.What can you do? nothing. Its in the box and you have left the polling center. >>
If this is the complaint then I'm sorry, but I can't support a re-vote based on this scenario (assuming the pictures that I've seen of the ballot are correct) because there can be no doubt which hole to punch (2nd or 3rd) for any of the candidates. Had there been no arrows pointing to the correct hole(s) to punch then I could go along with the argument.
I wholeheartedly agree that no-one should have their vote go to a candidate they didn't support, BUT, if the only solution to this dilemma is a re-vote then tell me how does anyone assure fairness in that? How do you know 100% for sure that some people won't change the way they originally voted? You can't. Someone who voted for Gore may decide that they now want Bush or someone who originally voted for Bush may now switch to Gore, or either may decide to vote for one of the third party candidates, or vice versa. Suppose they are allowed to re-vote and the total amount of votes cast for Bush goes up or goes down, then what? The original complaint had nothing to do with Bush supporters accidentally voting for the wrong candidate, but if the re-vote totals saw Bush's support decrease then wouldn't the Bush campaign then have a legitimate complaint, as well as Gore's campaign if Bush's total goes up? Where and when does it all end?
While I don't think anyone should be denied the opportunity to vote for whomever they wish, we are not now dealing with the same situation as when their first vote was cast. Should everyone now be allowed the benefit of hind site and reconsideration? If so, then shouldn't we all have the same? Its a huge bucket of worms with no solution that will ever be considered fair by everyone involved, so what do you do? At this point, there will be no satisfying everyone that the election was fair so I think the best way of handling this situation is to recount all the votes, wait 10 days for the absentee ballots to all come in, tally those up and award the state to whomever has the most votes and be done with it and move on. Re-voting, whether in one county, state-wide, or nationally shouldn't even be an option for consideration. That would be a total nightmare only leading to more accusations.