Alabama passed a near-total abortion ban with no exceptions for rape or incest

Page 16 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Atreus21

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
fskimospy said:
If SCOTUS overturns Roe I predict a bloodbath in the Senate for Republicans. It would be exactly what the Democrats need to push them over the top to retake it.

And so while the overturn of Roe would be a shameful act that would harm thousands or even millions of women it would have quite a silver lining as that would likely mean a Democratic trifecta in government - they could eliminate the filibuster and go to TOWN. (including even packing the court to re-legalize abortion)
Click to expand...

Why not pass a law?
 
F

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,930
55,265
136
ch33zw1z said:
Yea, it's just funny to see conservatives change their beat when the new tune comes out
Click to expand...

It is kind of funny that when McConnell uses the powers of Congress to deny Obama the ability to appoint a justice that conservatives are fine with it but when liberals talk about using the powers of Congress to add justices that’s somehow a coup or whatever.

Who knows it if will happen but it it does conservatives have simply reaped what they have sown.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HomerJS
Jaskalas

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,700
10,007
136
brycejones said:
Why not just leave women to make their own choices?
Click to expand...

Because a human life is on the line, at stake in these proceedings. Humans have no right to murder the innocent. And at some point between conception and birth it is barbaric to murder a viable child.
 
F

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,930
55,265
136
Jaskalas said:
A law would explicitly name and protect abortion. The Constitution does not.
Click to expand...

But the Constitution doesn't need to explicitly name a right to protect it. That's the whole point of the 9th amendment.

It would be a pretty insane world to live in where the right to control your own body wasn't an implicitly accepted one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie
HomerJS

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,268
32,756
136
fskimospy said:
It is kind of funny that when McConnell uses the powers of Congress to deny Obama the ability to appoint a justice that conservatives are fine with it but when liberals talk about using the powers of Congress to add justices that’s somehow a coup or whatever.

Who knows it if will happen but it it does conservatives have simply reaped what they have sown.
Click to expand...
BREAKING NEWS. Conservatives now proven to be 2 faced.
 
jackstar7

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
Jaskalas said:
A law would explicitly name and protect abortion. The Constitution does not.
Click to expand...
Something something not enumerated something something.

Also, abortion is a philosophy debate, not a medical one. For medical purposes it needs to exist to save lives.
 
Last edited:
Viper1j

Viper1j

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2018
4,443
4,139
136
Jaskalas said:
Because a human life is on the line, at stake in these proceedings. Humans have no right to murder the innocent. And at some point between conception and birth it is barbaric to murder a viable child.
Click to expand...

If a "human life" is on the line, let her take it out and put it on the ground.

Otherwise, it's just a parasite.

Humans don't need to leech in order to live. :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom