Discussion Ada/'Lovelace'? Next gen Nvidia gaming architecture speculation

Page 92 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,492
6,983
136
My guess is:
- 4060 Ti 16 GB for $499, which creates the same $100 gap to the 4070, as existed between the 3070 Ti and 3070.
- 4060 Ti 8 GB DOA edition for $429

I'd say $449 and $549. The 16 GB is probably more about PR than selling it... although it could work as a trial balloon to see if more VRAM at higher prices would work.
 

Aapje

Golden Member
Mar 21, 2022
1,530
2,106
106
I'd say $449 and $549. The 16 GB is probably more about PR than selling it... although it could work as a trial balloon to see if more VRAM at higher prices would work.
The prices I gave are already excessive and thus likely. Your prices are way too high. I don't think that Nvidia is foolish enough to think that they can get away with that.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,492
6,983
136
The prices I gave are already excessive and thus likely. Your prices are way too high.

There's no way nVidia is going to release a card with a lower MSRP than the previous gen. $449 is even only a 12% increase.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,492
6,983
136

Videocardz updates the timelines of the 4060/Ti... claiming that the release of the 4060 Ti (8 GB) is May 24th, and the 4060 Ti (16 GB) and 4060 is in July.
 

TESKATLIPOKA

Platinum Member
May 1, 2020
2,696
3,260
136

Videocardz updates the timelines of the 4060/Ti... claiming that the release of the 4060 Ti (8 GB) is May 24th, and the 4060 Ti (16 GB) and 4060 is in July.
I wonder how many would buy RTX 4060Ti 8GB instead of paying a bit more for the 16GB version.
The 16GB version could be sold later a lot easier and for more than the 8GB version.
 

TESKATLIPOKA

Platinum Member
May 1, 2020
2,696
3,260
136
It's probably going to be an $75-100 difference.
$399 vs $499?
That's not a small difference, considering performance would be basically the same except games where Vram is not enough. I think the 8GB version would sell more in this case.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,492
6,983
136
$399 vs $499?

This guy claims it is $399 and $499.


$399 is the same price as the 3060 Ti's original MSRP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TESKATLIPOKA

TESKATLIPOKA

Platinum Member
May 1, 2020
2,696
3,260
136
25% higher price for 8GB extra Vram?
I would love the extra memory, but for $100 more It's pretty questionable investment. At least, I hope It has the full die enabled.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ranulf

maddie

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2010
5,147
5,523
136
This guy claims it is $399 and $499.


$399 is the same price as the 3060 Ti's original MSRP.
There goes the 200$ for 8 GB, What is your new $ estimate?
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
5,026
6,592
136
25% higher price for 8GB extra Vram?
I would love the extra memory, but for $100 more It's pretty questionable investment. At least, I hope It has the full die enabled.

If it's a different die config between 8GB and 16 GB, then people will complain about name being the same.

No surprise that it cost $100 more.
 

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,916
2,700
136
Well.... at least it has 16GB of VRAM for $500 if that's true. Much better than the original speculation of the 8GB card costing $500. Slow rolling with the 8GB kind of sucks, but if they weren't expecting the 8GB backlash of the last month that would make sense.

Also gives time for old inventory to continue to clear. Very few people would actually choose N21 over a 4060 Ti at this point, but considering how much faster the 6800XT will be it would be a good look is there wasn't a bunch of $510 to $540 6800 XT's to pollute the price per frame charts.
1684352840661.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: coercitiv

Thunder 57

Diamond Member
Aug 19, 2007
3,805
6,413
136
If it's a different die config between 8GB and 16 GB, then people will complain about name being the same.

No surprise that it cost $100 more.

Why not? They hade the 1060 6GB and 3GB with different die configurations and got away with it. Charging $100 more for 16GB of VRAM is an expected, but crappy thing to do.
 

SteinFG

Senior member
Dec 29, 2021
718
854
106
This is going from 4 to 8 chips, not 8 to 16.
Memory Prices are still per GB, regardless of chips. Memory manufacturers don't want to shoot themselves in the foot.
And nvidia wants to maintain margin, so the price for NV is probably a lot less, maybe 50-60 dollars.
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,492
6,983
136
Memory Prices are still per GB, regardless of chips.

That seems unlikely. I'm sure they charge more for 2 GB versus 1 but not that much. Higher speeds also cost more I imagine. The 4060 Ti uses 18 gbps GDDR6 versus the 21 GDDR6X that the 4070 and 4070 Ti use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lodix

TESKATLIPOKA

Platinum Member
May 1, 2020
2,696
3,260
136
dramexchange
Screenshot_3.png
This would mean $3.1-$4.2 *8 = $24.8-33.6 for extra 8GB Vram.
RTX 4060Ti 16GB could be easily priced for only $50 more.

P.S. Keep in mind that this extra memory is made from 8*8gb chips, 4*16gb chips should be cheaper per GB, but not sure by how much.
 

tajoh111

Senior member
Mar 28, 2005
346
388
136
25% higher price for 8GB extra Vram?
I would love the extra memory, but for $100 more It's pretty questionable investment. At least, I hope It has the full die enabled.

What people don't realize is how expensive video memory is.


This is bulk pricing in units of 2000, but per 2Gbytes, pricing ranges from 20 USD(gddr6) to 33 USD(gddr6x).

So 8gb of GDDR6 cost 80 dollars.

This is more than the manufacturing cost of a r9 7950x!!


So while $100 dollars does seem like quite a bit for 8gb of video memory, it's fair considering the cost. It's also likely why Nvidia is skimpy on the video memory, 4 to 8gb of GDDR6x cost 60 to 120 dollars more which is not an insignificant amount.

Videocard manufacturing is just tremendously more expensive than CPU manufacturing which is why AMD can throw in a $180 dollar ram kit on a $400 dollar CPU and still make money, particularly when they killed off the bundled cooler.

Something like an RTX 4090 founder edition probably cost something like $800 dollars to manufacture.

$230 GPU + $350 Memory + $150 for the cooler + $70 for the rest of the PCB and power circuitry.

While complaining about GPU prices seem fair given the economic climate, we should really complain about CPU pricing. When you remove the memory, have a vastly smaller silicon size, the cooler and PCB, the margins on CPU's are tremendous.

I don't see why don't see more complaints about CPU pricing or the lack of an increasing in core count.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: psolord

TESKATLIPOKA

Platinum Member
May 1, 2020
2,696
3,260
136
If RTX 4060TI 8GB costs $399, then RTX 4060 could cost $299-329.
RTX 4060Ti should be only 25-30% faster, If the clocks are similar, so price/performance will be also similar.
 

TESKATLIPOKA

Platinum Member
May 1, 2020
2,696
3,260
136
What people don't realize is how expensive video memory is.


This is bulk pricing in units of 2000, but per 2Gbytes, pricing ranges from 20 USD(gddr6) to 33 USD(gddr6x).

So 8gb of GDDR6 cost 80 dollars.

This is more than the manufacturing cost of a r9 7950x!!


So while $100 dollars does seem like quite a bit for 8gb of video memory, it's fair considering the cost. It's also likely why Nvidia is skimpy on the video memory, 4 to 8gb of GDDR6x cost 60 to 120 dollars more which is not an insignificant amount.

Videocard manufacturing is just tremendously more expensive than CPU manufacturing which is why AMD can throw in a $180 dollar ram kit on a $400 dollar CPU and still make money, particularly when they killed off the bundled cooler.

Something like an RTX 4090 founder edition probably cost something like $800 dollars to manufacture.

$230 GPU + $350 Memory + $150 for the cooler + $70 for the rest of the PCB and power circuitry.

While complaining about GPU prices seem fair given the economic climate, we should really complain about CPU pricing. When you remove the memory, have a vastly smaller silicon size, the cooler and PCB, the margins on CPU's are tremendous.

I don't see why don't see more complaints about CPU pricing or the lack of an increasing in core count.
So you thing 16GB GDDR6 costs $160?
With such a high GDDR6 price they would never sell the card for only $499, It's practically a1/3 of the asked price.
BTW I just posted the prices for 8gb GDDR6 chips, and they are many times lower, 16gb chips won't cost 5x more.

Edit: In your link the cheapest 16gb 16GHz IC is actually for $28.51.
28.51*8= $228 or 46% of the whole card. I think everyone would agree, that this can't be true.
 
Last edited:

A///

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2017
4,351
3,160
136
that's a distributor. they're making a profit off each component sale when you buy from them. they're getting it cheaper from the oem. the oem is who aibs go to, not a distributor. you don't make 4 trips when you can do a single hop. nvidia at least sells the dies with the memory and other components in a package iirc. distributors are for small to mid size companies that won't be ordering 6-10 million in raw materials.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lodix and Mopetar