Doh! Acorn doesn't have license to do business in Maryland.
http://biggovernment.com/
Exclusive: ACORN Illegally Operating in Maryland
by Mike Roman
Last week, we saw some pretty disturbing activities revealed in the undercover footage from ACORN Housing?s Baltimore office. By any measure of conduct, the actions of ACORN?s employees should never have happened. It turns out the actions shouldn?t have happened for another, very simple, reason: ACORN can?t legally operate in the state of Maryland.
According to the following documents, ACORN, Inc.?the parent organization of all things ACORN?forfeited its corporate charter in Maryland in 2006. ACORN Housing forfeited its corporate charter in 2008. Any ACORN office in the state of Maryland is potentially operating illegally.
The Maryland Attorney General has made noise about prosecuting the intrepid journalists who undercovered the misdeeds of ACORN employees. Perhaps he should focus instead on how ACORN was able to operate without a license in his state.
http://biggovernment.com/
Exclusive: ACORN Illegally Operating in Maryland
by Mike Roman
Last week, we saw some pretty disturbing activities revealed in the undercover footage from ACORN Housing?s Baltimore office. By any measure of conduct, the actions of ACORN?s employees should never have happened. It turns out the actions shouldn?t have happened for another, very simple, reason: ACORN can?t legally operate in the state of Maryland.
According to the following documents, ACORN, Inc.?the parent organization of all things ACORN?forfeited its corporate charter in Maryland in 2006. ACORN Housing forfeited its corporate charter in 2008. Any ACORN office in the state of Maryland is potentially operating illegally.
The Maryland Attorney General has made noise about prosecuting the intrepid journalists who undercovered the misdeeds of ACORN employees. Perhaps he should focus instead on how ACORN was able to operate without a license in his state.
Uh...okay...thanks for that, chief?
I'd also like to add LA, Detroit and Chicago to that list. Are you going to "quote that for posterity" too? So far, the trend has been Democrat-controlled, liberal, "elite" cities. ACORN is a liberal activist group.
:disgust:
Did you have anything meaningful to add to the thread, or is it possible that even the most liberal leftist can't justify away the blatant corruption of ACORN? :Q
Well, seven Democrat Senators did vote against the measure to terminate funding for ACORN, so there are still a few ultra-liberals out there with their head in the sand.
LOL! LA is the rumor for now. Also rumblings of something big hitting tonight.
House republicans have sent a letter to The President asking him to severe all funding along with a letter to the IRS to do the same. I want to see a full blown congressional investigation/audit.
ACORN is done. They are now politically toxic. The Senate overwhelmingly voted to cut off funding, and they are out of the 2010 census.
Dont let the door hit you in the ass!
Dont let the door hit you in the ass!
PJABBER
Diamond Member
- Feb 8, 2001
- 4,822
- 0
- 0
I heard that the next video will be released at 5P EST and extracts will be broadcast by Fox News (Glen Beck, who else???) Any other bets as to which ACORN office get some free national publicity?
BigGovernment.com broke these videos on the Net so you will probably get to see them in their entirety there. The other online site likely to carry the entire video is Veritas Visuals, the site for the producers of these exposes.
Veritas Visuals
BigGovernment.com broke these videos on the Net so you will probably get to see them in their entirety there. The other online site likely to carry the entire video is Veritas Visuals, the site for the producers of these exposes.
Veritas Visuals
umbrella39
Lifer
- Jun 11, 2004
- 13,816
- 1,126
- 126
Do people really think this is a dem/rep thing? Do people posting here really think this is even a blip on the importance radar or will affect the balance of power? Please. Fuck ACORN and shut them down, simple enough? Can we get on with the fixing of the country that got broke yet or are fanbois going to keep diverting...
PJABBER
Diamond Member
- Feb 8, 2001
- 4,822
- 0
- 0
I believe this is a very important story not just because of the sordidness of it but because ACORN is an organization that systematically abuses the trust of the government and thus the trust of the taxpayer. In effect, it is a criminal political enterprise that is funded by taxpayers and special interest groups, particularly organized labor.
Here is someone else's perspective from the BigGovernment.com site that is breaking this story. I suggest reading the posting on the site as all of the statements made are hotlinked to reference sources that go into further detail. I am also hotlinking a few of the references at the end of this post.
ACORN?s Roots Watered by Taxpayers
ACORN?s Roots Watered by Taxpayers
by Bret Jacobson
Until last Thursday, many Americans assumed ACORN?s massive tax windfall was just a way to funnel taxpayer money to a radical organization. That was before the shocking video revelation that ACORN Housing staff ? funded by millions of dollars of the public?s money ? is willing to offer their ?counseling services? to would-be operators of child prostitute rings.
Clearly, it?s time to take a closer look at how taxpayer money drives the ACORN empire.
The Public Trough
Until recently, few knew much about ACORN or the reach of its 300-plus organizations with a hundred-million-dollar budget. The main financial sustenance for the behemoth comes from unions (which outsource dirty work, strategy, and anti-corporate attacks to the group), powerful and politically minded non-profit foundations, political campaigns (including $800,000 from then-Senator Barack Obama?s presidential campaign in 2008) and taxpayer money.
That public trough has been open to those who seem to feel they are more equal than others. The Washington Examiner investigated and found out that ?at least $53 million in federal funds have gone to ACORN activists since 1994.?
(See the spreadsheet here, it is a real eye opener at to how this criminal organization feeds off the public trough.)(See the spreadsheet here.)
A large chunk of that money flows from the federal government to the ACORN Housing Corporation (AHC). On the group?s IRS filings for the fiscal year ending in June 2007, AHC reported taking in more than $2.8 million in that year alone ? accounting for approximately 30 percent of that year?s budget. A 2008 report from the Consumers Rights League found that from 2004 through 2006, government funds accounted for 40 percent of the group?s $18.3 million in revenue.
Funding ACORN?s Political Movement
In 2007, more than $1.5 million went out the door from AHC to ACORN. Over the 2004 through 2006 period, the housing group sent more than $4.6 million in ?grants? and ?fees? to other ACORN-run organizations ? and it may well have violated the law in doing so.
AHC is legally allowed to accept taxpayer funds because it is technically a charity, whereas ACORN is not allowed to accept such money because it is engaged in overtly political activity. But ACORN officials run both organizations and seem to use the housing operations as a publicly funded piggy bank.
All this money going from taxpayers to AHC to other, more political ACORN entities is troubling. The trail goes cold, though, and it becomes difficult to track how the group?s officials ultimately use that money. That?s why recent revelations of $1 million embezzlement by the brother of ACORN?s founder surprised almost no one.
At least twice, Democratic administrations have caught ACORN misusing taxpayer money allocated for community work. Instead, the group used funds to build its own ?community organizing? efforts. The most recent example involved AHC using government money to support its efforts while trying to sign up people trying to learn how to buy a house.
There?s evidence the exact same problem continues to play out. An internal email from 2004 showed that a federal grant ?will provide the opportunity for ACORN and AHC to work together?? Moreover, affidavits show that AHC employees believe there?s cause to investigate further crimes and violations. This led the Consumers Rights League to call for a Congressional investigation and conclude, ?Congressional leaders should be wary of donating hard-earned tax dollars to a group with this sordid record.?
Where The Money Goes, Nobody (Really) Knows
What is clear is where the money does not go: The Examiner has reported that while the group is happy to take in millions and millions of taxpayer dollars, ACORN faces more than a million dollars in liens for unpaid taxes.
Further references -
ACORN's Union Work
$800,00 tie to Obama Presidential Political Campaign
ACORN - One Real Cause Of U.S. Housing Crisis
ACORN Fails To Pay Taxes - Partial List of Federal and State (Louisiana) Tax Liens
PJABBER
Diamond Member
- Feb 8, 2001
- 4,822
- 0
- 0
The young girl that played the prostitute role seems to have offered up the next city - San Bernardino, CA. Welcome to the Left Coast!
Here is her posting on BigGovernment.com -
The Science Behind the ACORN Sting
by Hannah Giles
After going undercover on the east coast, James and I headed to the west coast. We knew it was a risky endeavor but the results on the east coast were too good to ignore. We had to test our scenario in an opposite region. It is like a science experiment:
1) Ask A Question: What if a ?prostitute? and her alleged law school boyfriend walk into ACORN seeking housing for an underage brothel to fund his future congressional campaign?
2) Do Background Research:
1. Learn as much about ACORN housing procedures and protocol as possible.
2. History of ACORN and their effect on the United States
3) Construct a Hypothesis: ACORN is corrupt and it is in their nature to promote and disguise illegal behavior.
4) Experiment: Baltimore, DC, Brooklyn, San Bernardino, and?
5) Analyze and draw a conclusion.
America-
James O?Keefe and I posed a question and gathered the evidence. We?ve run around this nation on a quest for truth unraveling the mystery of organized corruption.
You Decide.
Here is her posting on BigGovernment.com -
The Science Behind the ACORN Sting
by Hannah Giles
After going undercover on the east coast, James and I headed to the west coast. We knew it was a risky endeavor but the results on the east coast were too good to ignore. We had to test our scenario in an opposite region. It is like a science experiment:
1) Ask A Question: What if a ?prostitute? and her alleged law school boyfriend walk into ACORN seeking housing for an underage brothel to fund his future congressional campaign?
2) Do Background Research:
1. Learn as much about ACORN housing procedures and protocol as possible.
2. History of ACORN and their effect on the United States
3) Construct a Hypothesis: ACORN is corrupt and it is in their nature to promote and disguise illegal behavior.
4) Experiment: Baltimore, DC, Brooklyn, San Bernardino, and?
5) Analyze and draw a conclusion.
America-
James O?Keefe and I posed a question and gathered the evidence. We?ve run around this nation on a quest for truth unraveling the mystery of organized corruption.
You Decide.
San Bernardino it was. The house pays on anybody that had anywhere on california. And this one is even MORE damning.
Patranus
Diamond Member
- Apr 15, 2007
- 9,280
- 0
- 0
Premeditated Murder.....
Frequent contact with Barbra Boxer (remember they are a 501c3 and cannot be "political")
White ACORN representative - there goes the race card.....
http://biggovernment.com/2009/...lifornia-here-we-come/
Obummer
Frequent contact with Barbra Boxer (remember they are a 501c3 and cannot be "political")
White ACORN representative - there goes the race card.....
http://biggovernment.com/2009/...lifornia-here-we-come/
Obummer
They've got more coming it seems. This is not over by any means.
"O'Keefe, meanwhile, told FOX News he wants an apology from media outlets "covering for ACORN" and the organization itself.
"They don't have any leg to stand on, so they're saying I dubbed in my voice, which is completely absurd," he said. "When the truth comes out in the end, they're going to be apologizing to us.""
"O'Keefe, meanwhile, told FOX News he wants an apology from media outlets "covering for ACORN" and the organization itself.
"They don't have any leg to stand on, so they're saying I dubbed in my voice, which is completely absurd," he said. "When the truth comes out in the end, they're going to be apologizing to us.""
PJABBER
Diamond Member
- Feb 8, 2001
- 4,822
- 0
- 0
I am now watching my first Glen Beck show and he is something else. The video is something else again.
The first San Bernardino ACORN employee just admitted that she is a former escort/prostitution madame and that she is a great admirer of another big time madame, Heidi Fleiss. She also admits she shot and killed her husband. She refers the kids to another adviser across the street who recommends setting up the underage prostitution business as a school and structuring it as a 503(c) corporation. When the kids go back to the former madame ACORN staffer she says she will go over to talk to the two men they just spoke to and threaten to kill them if they open their mouths about this. She implies the girl can use sex with bankers to obtain financing (well, this may work with some, hopefully the underwriting review will catch it if someone tries.) She also goes off about all the politicians she knows and supports, including Barbara Boxer who has an office just down the street.
This is just the first video installment of the segment. More to of this sickness to come.
Hey, ACORN supporters and community organizers, it is your turn to say something now.
The first San Bernardino ACORN employee just admitted that she is a former escort/prostitution madame and that she is a great admirer of another big time madame, Heidi Fleiss. She also admits she shot and killed her husband. She refers the kids to another adviser across the street who recommends setting up the underage prostitution business as a school and structuring it as a 503(c) corporation. When the kids go back to the former madame ACORN staffer she says she will go over to talk to the two men they just spoke to and threaten to kill them if they open their mouths about this. She implies the girl can use sex with bankers to obtain financing (well, this may work with some, hopefully the underwriting review will catch it if someone tries.) She also goes off about all the politicians she knows and supports, including Barbara Boxer who has an office just down the street.
This is just the first video installment of the segment. More to of this sickness to come.
Hey, ACORN supporters and community organizers, it is your turn to say something now.
Ok Barbara Boxer (along with the rest of the local politicos)....What did you know and when did you know it?
PJABBER
Diamond Member
- Feb 8, 2001
- 4,822
- 0
- 0
Alinsky Rule #8: Keep the pressure on. Never let up.
Quoted by James O'Keefe, who dedicates his WWW site to Obama's spiritual mentor, Saul Alinsky. O'Keefe covers all his bases, though. His other reference is Jesus Christ.
Veritas Visuals: Activists
Quoted by James O'Keefe, who dedicates his WWW site to Obama's spiritual mentor, Saul Alinsky. O'Keefe covers all his bases, though. His other reference is Jesus Christ.
Veritas Visuals: Activists
PJABBER
Diamond Member
- Feb 8, 2001
- 4,822
- 0
- 0
The Obama Tie-In
Inside Obama's ACORN
May 29, 2008, 4:00 a.m.
Inside Obama?s Acorn
By their fruits ye shall know them.
By Stanley Kurtz
? Stanley Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and an NRO contributing editor.
What if Barack Obama?s most important radical connection has been hiding in plain sight all along? Obama has had an intimate and long-term association with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (Acorn), the largest radical group in America. If I told you Obama had close ties with MoveOn.org or Code Pink, you?d know what I was talking about. Acorn is at least as radical as these better-known groups, arguably more so. Yet because Acorn works locally, in carefully selected urban areas, its national profile is lower. Acorn likes it that way. And so, I?d wager, does Barack Obama.
This is a story we?ve largely missed. While Obama?s Acorn connection has not gone entirely unreported, its depth, extent, and significance have been poorly understood. Typically, media background pieces note that, on behalf of Acorn, Obama and a team of Chicago attorneys won a 1995 suit forcing the state of Illinois to implement the federal ?motor-voter? bill. In fact, Obama?s Acorn connection is far more extensive. In the few stories where Obama?s role as an Acorn ?leadership trainer? is noted, or his seats on the boards of foundations that may have supported Acorn are discussed, there is little follow-up. Even these more extensive reports miss many aspects of Obama?s ties to Acorn.
An Anti-Capitalism Agenda
To understand the nature and extent of Acorn?s radicalism, an excellent place to begin is Sol Stern?s 2003 City Journal article, ?ACORN?s Nutty Regime for Cities.? (For a shorter but helpful piece, try Steven Malanga?s ?Acorn Squash.?)
Sol Stern explains that Acorn is the key modern successor of the radical 1960?s ?New Left,? with a ?1960?s-bred agenda of anti-capitalism? to match. Acorn, says Stern, grew out of ?one of the New Left?s silliest and most destructive groups, the National Welfare Rights Organization.? In the 1960?s, NWRO launched a campaign of sit-ins and disruptions at welfare offices. The goal was to remove eligibility restrictions, and thus effectively flood welfare rolls with so many clients that the system would burst. The theory, explains Stern, was that an impossibly overburdened welfare system would force ?a radical reconstruction of America?s unjust capitalist economy.? Instead of a socialist utopia, however, we got the culture of dependency and family breakdown that ate away at America?s inner cities ? until welfare reform began to turn the tide.
While Acorn holds to NWRO?s radical economic framework and its confrontational 1960?s-style tactics, the targets and strategy have changed. Acorn prefers to fly under the national radar, organizing locally in liberal urban areas ? where, Stern observes, local legislators and reporters are often ?slow to grasp how radical Acorn?s positions really are.? Acorn?s new goals are municipal ?living wage? laws targeting ?big-box? stores like Wal-Mart, rolling back welfare reform, and regulating banks ? efforts styled as combating ?predatory lending.? Unfortunately, instead of helping workers, Acorn?s living-wage campaigns drive businesses out of the very neighborhoods where jobs are needed most. Acorn?s opposition to welfare reform only threatens to worsen the self-reinforcing cycle of urban poverty and family breakdown. Perhaps most mischievously, says Stern, Acorn uses banking regulations to pressure financial institutions into massive ?donations? that it uses to finance supposedly non-partisan voter turn-out drives.
According to Stern, Acorn?s radical agenda sometimes shifts toward ?undisguised authoritarian socialism.? Fully aware of its living-wage campaign?s tendency to drive businesses out of cities, Acorn hopes to force companies that want to move to obtain ?exit visas.? ?How much longer before Acorn calls for exit visas for wealthy or middle-class individuals before they can leave a city?? asks Stern, adding, ?This is the road to serfdom indeed.?
In Your Face
Acorn?s tactics are famously ?in your face.? Just think of Code Pink?s well-known operations (threatening to occupy congressional offices, interrupting the testimony of General David Petraeus) and you?ll get the idea. Acorn protesters have disrupted Federal Reserve hearings, but mostly deploy their aggressive tactics locally. Chicago is home to one of its strongest chapters, and Acorn has burst into a closed city council meeting there. Acorn protestors in Baltimore disrupted a bankers? dinner and sent four busloads of profanity-screaming protestors against the mayor?s home, terrifying his wife and kids. Even a Baltimore city council member who generally supports Acorn said their intimidation tactics had crossed the line.
Acorn, however, defiantly touts its confrontational tactics. While Stern himself notes this, the point is driven home sharper still in an Acorn-friendly reply to Stern entitled ?Enraging the Right.? Written by academic/activists John Atlas and Peter Dreier, the reply?s avowed intent is to convince Acorn-friendly politicians, journalists, and funders not to desert the organization in the wake of Stern?s powerful critique. The stunning thing about this supposed rebuttal is that it confirms nearly everything Stern says. Do Atlas and Dreier object to Stern?s characterizations of Acorn?s radical plans ? even his slippery-slope warnings about Acorn?s designs on basic freedom of movement? Nope. ?Stern accurately outlines Acorn?s agenda,? they say.
Do Atlas and Dreier dismiss Stern?s catalogue of Acorn?s disruptive and intentionally intimidating tactics as a set of regrettable exceptions to Acorn?s rule of civility? Not a chance. Atlas and Dreier are at pains to point out that intimidation works. They proudly reel off the increased memberships that follow in the wake of high-profile disruptions, and clearly imply that the same public officials who object most vociferously to intimidation are the ones most likely to cave as a result. What really upsets Atlas and Dreier is that Stern misses the subtle national hand directing Acorn?s various local campaigns. This is radicalism unashamed.
But don?t let the disruptive tactics fool you. Acorn is a savvy and exceedingly effective political player. Stern says that Acorn?s key post?New Left innovation is its determination to take over the system from within, rather than futilely try to overthrow it from without. Stern calls this strategy a political version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Take Atlas and Dreier at their word: Acorn has an openly aggressive and intimidating side, but a sophisticated inside game, as well. Chicago?s Acorn leader, for example, won a seat on the Board of Aldermen as the candidate of a leftist ?New Party.?
Obama Meets Acorn
What has Barack Obama got to do with all this? Plenty. Let?s begin with Obama?s pre-law school days as a community organizer in Chicago. Few people have a clear idea of just what a ?community organizer? does. A Los Angeles Times piece on Obama?s early Chicago days opens with the touching story of his efforts to build a partnership with Chicago?s ?Friends of the Parks,? so that parents in a blighted neighborhood could have an inviting spot for their kids to play. This is the image of Obama?s organizing we?re supposed to hold. It?s far from the whole story, however. As the L. A. Times puts it, ?Obama?s task was to help far South Side residents press for improvement? in their communities. Part of Obama?s work, it would appear, was to organize demonstrations, much in the mold of radical groups like Acorn.
Although the L. A. Times piece is generally positive, it does press Obama?s organizing tales on certain points. Some claim that Obama?s book, Dreams from My Father, exaggerates his accomplishments in spearheading an asbestos cleanup at a low-income housing project. Obama, these critics say, denies due credit to Hazel Johnson, an activist who claims she was the one who actually discovered the asbestos problem and led the efforts to resolve it. Read carefully, the L. A. Times story leans toward confirming this complaint against Obama, yet the story?s emphasis is to affirm Obama?s important role in the battle. Speaking up in defense of Obama on the asbestos issue is Madeleine Talbot, who at the time was a leader at Chicago Acorn. Talbot, we learn, was so impressed by Obama?s organizing skills that she invited him to help train her own staff.
And what exactly was Talbot?s work with Acorn? Talbot turns out to have been a key leader of that attempt by Acorn to storm the Chicago City Council (during a living-wage debate). While Sol Stern mentions this story in passing, the details are worth a look: On July 31, 1997, six people were arrested as 200 Acorn protesters tried to storm the Chicago City Council session. According to the Chicago Daily Herald, Acorn demonstrators pushed over the metal detector and table used to screen visitors, backed police against the doors to the council chamber, and blocked late-arriving aldermen and city staff from entering the session.
Reading the Herald article, you might think Acorn?s demonstrators had simply lost patience after being denied entry to the gallery at a packed meeting. Yet the full story points in a different direction. This was not an overreaction by frustrated followers who couldn?t get into a meeting (there were plenty of protestors already in the gallery), but almost certainly a deliberate bit of what radicals call ?direct action,? orchestrated by Acorn?s Madeleine Talbot. As Talbot was led away handcuffed, charged with mob action and disorderly conduct, she explicitly justified her actions in storming the meeting. This was the woman who first drew Obama into his alliance with Acorn, and whose staff Obama helped train.
Surprise Visit
Does that mean Obama himself schooled Acorn volunteers in disruptive ?direct action?? Not necessarily. The City Council storming took place in 1997, years after Obama?s early organizing days. And in general, Obama seems to have been part of Acorn?s ?inside baseball? strategy. As a national star from his law school days, Obama knew he had a political future, and would surely have been reluctant to violate the law. In his early organizing days, Obama used to tell the residents he organized that they?d be more effective in their protests if they controlled their anger. On the other hand, as he established and deepened his association with Acorn through the years, Obama had to know what the organization was all about. Moreover, in his early days, Obama was not exactly a stranger to the ?direct action? side of community organizing.
Consider the second charge against Obama raised by the L.A. Times backgrounder. On the stump today, Obama often says he helped prevent South Side Chicago blacks, Latinos, and whites from turning on each other after losing their jobs, but many of the community organizers interviewed by the L. A. Times say that Obama worked overwhelmingly with blacks.
To rebut this charge, Obama?s organizer friends tell the story of how he helped plan ?actions? that included mixed white, black, and Latino groups. For example, following Obama?s plan, one such group paid a ?surprise visit? to a meeting between local officials considering a landfill expansion. The protestors surrounded the meeting table while one activist made a statement chiding the officials, after which the protestors filed out. Presto! Obama is immunized from charges of having worked exclusively with blacks ? but at the cost of granting us a peek at the not-so-warm-and-fuzzy side of his community organizing. Intimidation tactics are revealed, and Obama?s alliance with radical Acorn activists like Madeleine Talbot begins to make sense.
?Non-Partisan?
The extent of Obama?s ties to Acorn has not been recognized. We find some important details in an article in the journal Social Policy entitled, ?Case Study: Chicago ? The Barack Obama Campaign,? by Toni Foulkes, a Chicago Acorn leader and a member of Acorn?s National Association Board. The odd thing about this article is that Foulkes is forced to protect the technically ?non-partisan? status of Acorn?s get-out-the-vote campaigns, even as he does everything in his power to give Acorn credit for helping its favorite son win the critical 2004 primary that secured Obama the Democratic nomination to the U.S. Senate.
Before giving us a tour of Acorn?s pro-Obama but somehow ?non-partisan? election activities, Foulks treats us to a brief history of Obama?s ties to Acorn. While most press accounts imply that Obama just happened to be at the sort of public-interest law firm that would take Acorn?s ?motor voter? case, Foulkes claims that Acorn specifically sought out Obama?s representation in the motor voter case, remembering Obama from the days when he worked with Talbot. And while many reports speak of Obama?s post-law school role organizing ?Project VOTE? in 1992, Foulkes makes it clear that this project was undertaken in direct partnership with Acorn. Foulkes then stresses Obama?s yearly service as a key figure in Acorn?s leadership-training seminars.
At least a few news reports have briefly mentioned Obama?s role in training Acorn?s leaders, but none that I know of have said what Foulkes reports next: that Obama?s long service with Acorn led many members to serve as the volunteer shock troops of Obama?s early political campaigns ? his initial 1996 State Senate campaign, and his failed bid for Congress in 2000 (Foulkes confuses the dates of these two campaigns.) With Obama having personally helped train a new cadre of Chicago Acorn leaders, by the time of Obama?s 2004 U.S. Senate campaign, Obama and Acorn were ?old friends,? says Foulkes.
So along with the reservoir of political support that came to Obama through his close ties with Jeremiah Wright, Father Michael Pfleger, and other Chicago black churches, Chicago Acorn appears to have played a major role in Obama?s political advance. Sure enough, a bit of digging into Obama?s years in the Illinois State Senate indicates strong concern with Acorn?s signature issues, as well as meetings with Acorn and the introduction by Obama of Acorn-friendly legislation on the living wage and banking practices. You begin to wonder whether, in his Springfield days, Obama might have best been characterized as ?the Senator from Acorn.?
Foundation Money
Although it?s been noted in an important story by John Fund, and in a long Obama background piece in the New York Times, more attention needs to be paid to possible links between Obama and Acorn during the period of Obama?s service on the boards of two charitable foundations, the Woods Fund and the Joyce Foundation.
According to the New York Times, Obama?s memberships on those foundation boards, ?allowed him to help direct tens of millions of dollars in grants? to various liberal organizations, including Chicago Acorn, ?whose endorsement Obama sought and won in his State Senate race.? As best as I can tell (and this needs to be checked out more fully), Acorn maintains both political and ?non-partisan? arms. Obama not only sought and received the endorsement of Acorn?s political arm in his local campaigns, he recently accepted Acorn?s endorsement for the presidency, in pursuit of which he reminded Acorn officials of his long-standing ties to the group.
Supposedly, Acorn?s political arm is segregated from its ?non-partisan? registration and get-out-the-vote efforts, but after reading Foulkes? case study, this non-partisanship is exceedingly difficult to discern. As I understand, it would be illegal for Obama to sit on a foundation board and direct money to an organization that openly served as his key get-out-the-vote volunteers on Election Day. I?m not saying Obama crossed a legal line here: Based on Foulkes? account, Acorn?s get-out-the-vote drive most likely observed the technicalities of ?non-partisanship.?
Nevertheless, the possibilities suggested by a combined reading of the New York Times piece and the Foulkes article are disturbing. While keeping within the technicalities of the law, Obama may have been able to direct substantial foundation money to his organized political supporters. I offer no settled conclusion, but the matter certainly warrants further investigation and discussion. Obama is supposed to be the man who transcends partisanship. Has he instead used his post at an allegedly non-partisan foundation to direct money to a supposedly non-partisan group, in pursuit of what are in fact nakedly partisan and personal ends? I have no final answer, but the question needs to be pursued further.
In fact, the broader set of practices by which activist groups pursue intensely partisan ends under the guise of non-partisanship merits further scrutiny. Consider the 2006 report by Jonathan Bechtle, ?Voter Turnout or Voter Fraud?? which includes a discussion of the nexus between Project Vote and Acorn, a nexus where Obama himself once resided. According to Bechtle, ?It?s clear that groups that claimed to be nonpartisan wanted a partisan outcome,? and reading Foulkes?s case study of Acorn?s role in Obama?s U.S. Senate campaign, one can?t help but agree.
Radical Obama
Important as these questions of funding and partisanship are, the larger point is that Obama?s ties to Acorn ? arguably the most politically radical large-scale activist group in the country ? are wide, deep, and longstanding. If Acorn is adept at creating a non-partisan, inside-game veneer for what is in fact an intensely radical, leftist, and politically partisan reality, so is Obama himself. This is hardly a coincidence: Obama helped train Acorn?s leaders in how to play this game. For the most part, Obama seems to have favored the political-insider strategy, yet it?s clear that he knew how to play the in-your-face ?direct action? game as well. And surely during his many years of close association with Acorn, Obama had to know what the group was all about.
The shame of it is that when the L. A. Times returned to Obama?s stomping grounds, it found the park he?d helped renovate reclaimed by drug dealers and thugs. The community organizer strategy may generate feel-good moments and best-selling books, but I suspect a Wal-Mart as the seed-bed of a larger shopping complex would have done far more to save the neighborhood where Obama worked to organize in the ?progressive? fashion. Unfortunately, Obama?s Acorn cronies have blocked that solution.
In any case, if you?re looking for the piece of the puzzle that confirms and explains Obama?s network of radical ties, gather your Acorns this spring. Or next winter, you may just be left watching the ?President from Acorn? at his feast.
************
Prescient, to say the least.
Inside Obama's ACORN
May 29, 2008, 4:00 a.m.
Inside Obama?s Acorn
By their fruits ye shall know them.
By Stanley Kurtz
? Stanley Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and an NRO contributing editor.
What if Barack Obama?s most important radical connection has been hiding in plain sight all along? Obama has had an intimate and long-term association with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (Acorn), the largest radical group in America. If I told you Obama had close ties with MoveOn.org or Code Pink, you?d know what I was talking about. Acorn is at least as radical as these better-known groups, arguably more so. Yet because Acorn works locally, in carefully selected urban areas, its national profile is lower. Acorn likes it that way. And so, I?d wager, does Barack Obama.
This is a story we?ve largely missed. While Obama?s Acorn connection has not gone entirely unreported, its depth, extent, and significance have been poorly understood. Typically, media background pieces note that, on behalf of Acorn, Obama and a team of Chicago attorneys won a 1995 suit forcing the state of Illinois to implement the federal ?motor-voter? bill. In fact, Obama?s Acorn connection is far more extensive. In the few stories where Obama?s role as an Acorn ?leadership trainer? is noted, or his seats on the boards of foundations that may have supported Acorn are discussed, there is little follow-up. Even these more extensive reports miss many aspects of Obama?s ties to Acorn.
An Anti-Capitalism Agenda
To understand the nature and extent of Acorn?s radicalism, an excellent place to begin is Sol Stern?s 2003 City Journal article, ?ACORN?s Nutty Regime for Cities.? (For a shorter but helpful piece, try Steven Malanga?s ?Acorn Squash.?)
Sol Stern explains that Acorn is the key modern successor of the radical 1960?s ?New Left,? with a ?1960?s-bred agenda of anti-capitalism? to match. Acorn, says Stern, grew out of ?one of the New Left?s silliest and most destructive groups, the National Welfare Rights Organization.? In the 1960?s, NWRO launched a campaign of sit-ins and disruptions at welfare offices. The goal was to remove eligibility restrictions, and thus effectively flood welfare rolls with so many clients that the system would burst. The theory, explains Stern, was that an impossibly overburdened welfare system would force ?a radical reconstruction of America?s unjust capitalist economy.? Instead of a socialist utopia, however, we got the culture of dependency and family breakdown that ate away at America?s inner cities ? until welfare reform began to turn the tide.
While Acorn holds to NWRO?s radical economic framework and its confrontational 1960?s-style tactics, the targets and strategy have changed. Acorn prefers to fly under the national radar, organizing locally in liberal urban areas ? where, Stern observes, local legislators and reporters are often ?slow to grasp how radical Acorn?s positions really are.? Acorn?s new goals are municipal ?living wage? laws targeting ?big-box? stores like Wal-Mart, rolling back welfare reform, and regulating banks ? efforts styled as combating ?predatory lending.? Unfortunately, instead of helping workers, Acorn?s living-wage campaigns drive businesses out of the very neighborhoods where jobs are needed most. Acorn?s opposition to welfare reform only threatens to worsen the self-reinforcing cycle of urban poverty and family breakdown. Perhaps most mischievously, says Stern, Acorn uses banking regulations to pressure financial institutions into massive ?donations? that it uses to finance supposedly non-partisan voter turn-out drives.
According to Stern, Acorn?s radical agenda sometimes shifts toward ?undisguised authoritarian socialism.? Fully aware of its living-wage campaign?s tendency to drive businesses out of cities, Acorn hopes to force companies that want to move to obtain ?exit visas.? ?How much longer before Acorn calls for exit visas for wealthy or middle-class individuals before they can leave a city?? asks Stern, adding, ?This is the road to serfdom indeed.?
In Your Face
Acorn?s tactics are famously ?in your face.? Just think of Code Pink?s well-known operations (threatening to occupy congressional offices, interrupting the testimony of General David Petraeus) and you?ll get the idea. Acorn protesters have disrupted Federal Reserve hearings, but mostly deploy their aggressive tactics locally. Chicago is home to one of its strongest chapters, and Acorn has burst into a closed city council meeting there. Acorn protestors in Baltimore disrupted a bankers? dinner and sent four busloads of profanity-screaming protestors against the mayor?s home, terrifying his wife and kids. Even a Baltimore city council member who generally supports Acorn said their intimidation tactics had crossed the line.
Acorn, however, defiantly touts its confrontational tactics. While Stern himself notes this, the point is driven home sharper still in an Acorn-friendly reply to Stern entitled ?Enraging the Right.? Written by academic/activists John Atlas and Peter Dreier, the reply?s avowed intent is to convince Acorn-friendly politicians, journalists, and funders not to desert the organization in the wake of Stern?s powerful critique. The stunning thing about this supposed rebuttal is that it confirms nearly everything Stern says. Do Atlas and Dreier object to Stern?s characterizations of Acorn?s radical plans ? even his slippery-slope warnings about Acorn?s designs on basic freedom of movement? Nope. ?Stern accurately outlines Acorn?s agenda,? they say.
Do Atlas and Dreier dismiss Stern?s catalogue of Acorn?s disruptive and intentionally intimidating tactics as a set of regrettable exceptions to Acorn?s rule of civility? Not a chance. Atlas and Dreier are at pains to point out that intimidation works. They proudly reel off the increased memberships that follow in the wake of high-profile disruptions, and clearly imply that the same public officials who object most vociferously to intimidation are the ones most likely to cave as a result. What really upsets Atlas and Dreier is that Stern misses the subtle national hand directing Acorn?s various local campaigns. This is radicalism unashamed.
But don?t let the disruptive tactics fool you. Acorn is a savvy and exceedingly effective political player. Stern says that Acorn?s key post?New Left innovation is its determination to take over the system from within, rather than futilely try to overthrow it from without. Stern calls this strategy a political version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Take Atlas and Dreier at their word: Acorn has an openly aggressive and intimidating side, but a sophisticated inside game, as well. Chicago?s Acorn leader, for example, won a seat on the Board of Aldermen as the candidate of a leftist ?New Party.?
Obama Meets Acorn
What has Barack Obama got to do with all this? Plenty. Let?s begin with Obama?s pre-law school days as a community organizer in Chicago. Few people have a clear idea of just what a ?community organizer? does. A Los Angeles Times piece on Obama?s early Chicago days opens with the touching story of his efforts to build a partnership with Chicago?s ?Friends of the Parks,? so that parents in a blighted neighborhood could have an inviting spot for their kids to play. This is the image of Obama?s organizing we?re supposed to hold. It?s far from the whole story, however. As the L. A. Times puts it, ?Obama?s task was to help far South Side residents press for improvement? in their communities. Part of Obama?s work, it would appear, was to organize demonstrations, much in the mold of radical groups like Acorn.
Although the L. A. Times piece is generally positive, it does press Obama?s organizing tales on certain points. Some claim that Obama?s book, Dreams from My Father, exaggerates his accomplishments in spearheading an asbestos cleanup at a low-income housing project. Obama, these critics say, denies due credit to Hazel Johnson, an activist who claims she was the one who actually discovered the asbestos problem and led the efforts to resolve it. Read carefully, the L. A. Times story leans toward confirming this complaint against Obama, yet the story?s emphasis is to affirm Obama?s important role in the battle. Speaking up in defense of Obama on the asbestos issue is Madeleine Talbot, who at the time was a leader at Chicago Acorn. Talbot, we learn, was so impressed by Obama?s organizing skills that she invited him to help train her own staff.
And what exactly was Talbot?s work with Acorn? Talbot turns out to have been a key leader of that attempt by Acorn to storm the Chicago City Council (during a living-wage debate). While Sol Stern mentions this story in passing, the details are worth a look: On July 31, 1997, six people were arrested as 200 Acorn protesters tried to storm the Chicago City Council session. According to the Chicago Daily Herald, Acorn demonstrators pushed over the metal detector and table used to screen visitors, backed police against the doors to the council chamber, and blocked late-arriving aldermen and city staff from entering the session.
Reading the Herald article, you might think Acorn?s demonstrators had simply lost patience after being denied entry to the gallery at a packed meeting. Yet the full story points in a different direction. This was not an overreaction by frustrated followers who couldn?t get into a meeting (there were plenty of protestors already in the gallery), but almost certainly a deliberate bit of what radicals call ?direct action,? orchestrated by Acorn?s Madeleine Talbot. As Talbot was led away handcuffed, charged with mob action and disorderly conduct, she explicitly justified her actions in storming the meeting. This was the woman who first drew Obama into his alliance with Acorn, and whose staff Obama helped train.
Surprise Visit
Does that mean Obama himself schooled Acorn volunteers in disruptive ?direct action?? Not necessarily. The City Council storming took place in 1997, years after Obama?s early organizing days. And in general, Obama seems to have been part of Acorn?s ?inside baseball? strategy. As a national star from his law school days, Obama knew he had a political future, and would surely have been reluctant to violate the law. In his early organizing days, Obama used to tell the residents he organized that they?d be more effective in their protests if they controlled their anger. On the other hand, as he established and deepened his association with Acorn through the years, Obama had to know what the organization was all about. Moreover, in his early days, Obama was not exactly a stranger to the ?direct action? side of community organizing.
Consider the second charge against Obama raised by the L.A. Times backgrounder. On the stump today, Obama often says he helped prevent South Side Chicago blacks, Latinos, and whites from turning on each other after losing their jobs, but many of the community organizers interviewed by the L. A. Times say that Obama worked overwhelmingly with blacks.
To rebut this charge, Obama?s organizer friends tell the story of how he helped plan ?actions? that included mixed white, black, and Latino groups. For example, following Obama?s plan, one such group paid a ?surprise visit? to a meeting between local officials considering a landfill expansion. The protestors surrounded the meeting table while one activist made a statement chiding the officials, after which the protestors filed out. Presto! Obama is immunized from charges of having worked exclusively with blacks ? but at the cost of granting us a peek at the not-so-warm-and-fuzzy side of his community organizing. Intimidation tactics are revealed, and Obama?s alliance with radical Acorn activists like Madeleine Talbot begins to make sense.
?Non-Partisan?
The extent of Obama?s ties to Acorn has not been recognized. We find some important details in an article in the journal Social Policy entitled, ?Case Study: Chicago ? The Barack Obama Campaign,? by Toni Foulkes, a Chicago Acorn leader and a member of Acorn?s National Association Board. The odd thing about this article is that Foulkes is forced to protect the technically ?non-partisan? status of Acorn?s get-out-the-vote campaigns, even as he does everything in his power to give Acorn credit for helping its favorite son win the critical 2004 primary that secured Obama the Democratic nomination to the U.S. Senate.
Before giving us a tour of Acorn?s pro-Obama but somehow ?non-partisan? election activities, Foulks treats us to a brief history of Obama?s ties to Acorn. While most press accounts imply that Obama just happened to be at the sort of public-interest law firm that would take Acorn?s ?motor voter? case, Foulkes claims that Acorn specifically sought out Obama?s representation in the motor voter case, remembering Obama from the days when he worked with Talbot. And while many reports speak of Obama?s post-law school role organizing ?Project VOTE? in 1992, Foulkes makes it clear that this project was undertaken in direct partnership with Acorn. Foulkes then stresses Obama?s yearly service as a key figure in Acorn?s leadership-training seminars.
At least a few news reports have briefly mentioned Obama?s role in training Acorn?s leaders, but none that I know of have said what Foulkes reports next: that Obama?s long service with Acorn led many members to serve as the volunteer shock troops of Obama?s early political campaigns ? his initial 1996 State Senate campaign, and his failed bid for Congress in 2000 (Foulkes confuses the dates of these two campaigns.) With Obama having personally helped train a new cadre of Chicago Acorn leaders, by the time of Obama?s 2004 U.S. Senate campaign, Obama and Acorn were ?old friends,? says Foulkes.
So along with the reservoir of political support that came to Obama through his close ties with Jeremiah Wright, Father Michael Pfleger, and other Chicago black churches, Chicago Acorn appears to have played a major role in Obama?s political advance. Sure enough, a bit of digging into Obama?s years in the Illinois State Senate indicates strong concern with Acorn?s signature issues, as well as meetings with Acorn and the introduction by Obama of Acorn-friendly legislation on the living wage and banking practices. You begin to wonder whether, in his Springfield days, Obama might have best been characterized as ?the Senator from Acorn.?
Foundation Money
Although it?s been noted in an important story by John Fund, and in a long Obama background piece in the New York Times, more attention needs to be paid to possible links between Obama and Acorn during the period of Obama?s service on the boards of two charitable foundations, the Woods Fund and the Joyce Foundation.
According to the New York Times, Obama?s memberships on those foundation boards, ?allowed him to help direct tens of millions of dollars in grants? to various liberal organizations, including Chicago Acorn, ?whose endorsement Obama sought and won in his State Senate race.? As best as I can tell (and this needs to be checked out more fully), Acorn maintains both political and ?non-partisan? arms. Obama not only sought and received the endorsement of Acorn?s political arm in his local campaigns, he recently accepted Acorn?s endorsement for the presidency, in pursuit of which he reminded Acorn officials of his long-standing ties to the group.
Supposedly, Acorn?s political arm is segregated from its ?non-partisan? registration and get-out-the-vote efforts, but after reading Foulkes? case study, this non-partisanship is exceedingly difficult to discern. As I understand, it would be illegal for Obama to sit on a foundation board and direct money to an organization that openly served as his key get-out-the-vote volunteers on Election Day. I?m not saying Obama crossed a legal line here: Based on Foulkes? account, Acorn?s get-out-the-vote drive most likely observed the technicalities of ?non-partisanship.?
Nevertheless, the possibilities suggested by a combined reading of the New York Times piece and the Foulkes article are disturbing. While keeping within the technicalities of the law, Obama may have been able to direct substantial foundation money to his organized political supporters. I offer no settled conclusion, but the matter certainly warrants further investigation and discussion. Obama is supposed to be the man who transcends partisanship. Has he instead used his post at an allegedly non-partisan foundation to direct money to a supposedly non-partisan group, in pursuit of what are in fact nakedly partisan and personal ends? I have no final answer, but the question needs to be pursued further.
In fact, the broader set of practices by which activist groups pursue intensely partisan ends under the guise of non-partisanship merits further scrutiny. Consider the 2006 report by Jonathan Bechtle, ?Voter Turnout or Voter Fraud?? which includes a discussion of the nexus between Project Vote and Acorn, a nexus where Obama himself once resided. According to Bechtle, ?It?s clear that groups that claimed to be nonpartisan wanted a partisan outcome,? and reading Foulkes?s case study of Acorn?s role in Obama?s U.S. Senate campaign, one can?t help but agree.
Radical Obama
Important as these questions of funding and partisanship are, the larger point is that Obama?s ties to Acorn ? arguably the most politically radical large-scale activist group in the country ? are wide, deep, and longstanding. If Acorn is adept at creating a non-partisan, inside-game veneer for what is in fact an intensely radical, leftist, and politically partisan reality, so is Obama himself. This is hardly a coincidence: Obama helped train Acorn?s leaders in how to play this game. For the most part, Obama seems to have favored the political-insider strategy, yet it?s clear that he knew how to play the in-your-face ?direct action? game as well. And surely during his many years of close association with Acorn, Obama had to know what the group was all about.
The shame of it is that when the L. A. Times returned to Obama?s stomping grounds, it found the park he?d helped renovate reclaimed by drug dealers and thugs. The community organizer strategy may generate feel-good moments and best-selling books, but I suspect a Wal-Mart as the seed-bed of a larger shopping complex would have done far more to save the neighborhood where Obama worked to organize in the ?progressive? fashion. Unfortunately, Obama?s Acorn cronies have blocked that solution.
In any case, if you?re looking for the piece of the puzzle that confirms and explains Obama?s network of radical ties, gather your Acorns this spring. Or next winter, you may just be left watching the ?President from Acorn? at his feast.
************
Prescient, to say the least.
Schmide
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2002
- 5,745
- 1,036
- 126
PJABBER Discuss the issues! Stop dumping articles in the conversation. Especially really really big ones.
On topic. When you find the memo that instructs the workers to give bad advice, the controversy begins. Until then, It' just a few bad low level employees doing a bad job. By this same logic, you should demonize all the tea baggers because a few in there are bad racist freaks.
On topic. When you find the memo that instructs the workers to give bad advice, the controversy begins. Until then, It' just a few bad low level employees doing a bad job. By this same logic, you should demonize all the tea baggers because a few in there are bad racist freaks.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter