9/11 Conspiracy

[Steeplerot]

Originally posted by: Banzai042
Ok, for all those that say that there were explosions in the basement of the WTC that brought the building down, how in the world do you explain the fact that the collapse started from the location where the planes hit the buildings? Did firefighters get through to the floors that were filled with burning jet fuel and plant explosives then get back out (keep in mind that even if you don't think the jet fuel was enough to melt the steel it was still burning hot enough to make placing explosives a problem), or were the explosives pre-positioned? And if they were pre positioned then were there explosives all through the wtc and they just detonated a specific group of them, or did they know which exact floors the planes would hit at? Also, how in the world did pre-positioned explosives survive the impact of the plane and the fires for 1 hour without premature detonation?

All those questions are answered in loosechange 2 I think, seems the current version is that they were preset a few days before when bomb sniffing dogs and security teams were evacuated in rotations for "drills" days before the accident.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change

I have my own doubts at this stuff, but some stuff is very fishy about the "official" story the firemans communications to each other while the fire was burning is pretty odd how they all were saying there were explosions, and there were even rescue teams that made it all the way up to 80th or so floor even though the official story would have you think it would have been so hot noone would be able to get near. *shrug*

Plenty to think about after hearing the firemans opinions and people nearby that was not released until recently.

 

[will889]

Well if you consider that extremely reputable lead fireman confirmed a "pull" on tower 7 by the guys that had all three towers insured that's pretty much all you need to know. Why would ordinance even be in tower7 on that day? Why of all days - would it be ready to be pulled on that day? and why would there be that huge ins. policy adjustment two weeks before 9-11? Just the possibility that tower 7 would be "wired" (if it were actually true) would indicate a very likely connection to the other towers (eg: also "possibly" wired). Actually, to play devils advocate here- to attempt to mix things up as to "make it look" like why/how could we go through all of that trouble when all that needed to be done were the 'pulls' itself. Theoretically, adding planes to the mix would actually be smart as to cause the question "why would they go through all of that trouble... it makes no sense". Oh, but the genius is actually right there in the confusion .... theoretically. Even if more details were to ever come out that shed negativity it would all be lost in a cloud of "it doesn't make sense". I myself would like to know why there was absolutely no evidence of bodies, anywhere at all on near any the wreckage at any crash site. None. Zip. Nada.

Just why did no.7 mysteriously go down?

 

[ntdz]

Originally posted by: Steeplerot
Just wanted to point out this strange little quirk in this poll I saw today,

http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight

81% of americans think the admin covered up 9/11..Take it as you will.

Originally posted by: moomoo40moo
OP, I think you should change that outdated video with the "loose change 2nd edition" one.

That is a good idea here it is:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change

The first one is OLD nowdays.

It's an internet poll...why even post it?

 

[JEDIYoda]

Originally posted by: will889
Well if you consider that extremely reputable lead fireman confirmed a "pull" on tower 7 by the guys that had all three towers insured that's pretty much all you need to know. Why would ordinance even be in tower7 on that day? Why of all days - would it be ready to be pulled on that day? and why would there be that huge ins. policy adjustment two weeks before 9-11? Just the possibility that tower 7 would be "wired" (if it were actually true) would indicate a very likely connection to the other towers (eg: also "possibly" wired). Actually, to play devils advocate here- to attempt to mix things up as to "make it look" like why/how could we go through all of that trouble when all that needed to be done were the 'pulls' itself. Theoretically, adding planes to the mix would actually be smart as to cause the question "why would they go through all of that trouble... it makes no sense". Oh, but the genius is actually right there in the confusion .... theoretically. Even if more details were to ever come out that shed negativity it would all be lost in a cloud of "it doesn't make sense". I myself would like to know why there was absolutely no evidence of bodies, anywhere at all on near any the wreckage at any crash site. None. Zip. Nada.

Just why did no.7 mysteriously go down?

My God another consipracy theorie dude...
rofl.....will...no bodies you tell that to the loved ones of those who died.....