Originally posted by: Estrella
can it take a corner? I would take it if all roads were straight.
Seems kind of irrelevant considering the car isn't made by ViperOriginally posted by: marulee
Do you work for viper or something?![]()
Originally posted by: AdamK47 3DS
Ohhhh... a new oil filter! I wonder what the specs are on that bad boy.
Originally posted by: DougK62
Originally posted by: Estrella
can it take a corner? I would take it if all roads were straight.
:roll: The Viper is wicked on a road coarse - it runs with the supercars just like the Z06 does.
Originally posted by: Minjin
Vipers have proven themselves MORE than capable on the race track. Do some searching for ORECA Vipers. I'd love to have one for a track car.
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Why did they need an 8.4L V10 again?
Why does any car need more than 50 bhp again?Originally posted by: mariok2006
Why did they need an 8.4L V10 again?
Originally posted by: Vic
Why does any car need more than 50 bhp again?Originally posted by: mariok2006
Why did they need an 8.4L V10 again?
:roll:
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: DougK62
Originally posted by: Estrella
can it take a corner? I would take it if all roads were straight.
:roll: The Viper is wicked on a road coarse - it runs with the supercars just like the Z06 does.
I don't know if you are being sarcastic or not, but for what it's worth in Clarkson's DVD he pitted a Z4 M Coupe against the Viper and the Viper only beat it by a few inches. It was a short and technical course in favor of the BMW though.
What is efficiency?Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: Vic
Why does any car need more than 50 bhp again?Originally posted by: mariok2006
Why did they need an 8.4L V10 again?
:roll:
My comment was towards the lack of efficiency.
Assuming comparable drivetrain weight, creating power with larger displacement at low rpm is more efficient than creating power with smaller displacement at higher rpm. That's why cars like the Viper and the Corvette can make the power they do while still getting 20+ mpg on the highway.Originally posted by: mariok2006
My comment was towards the lack of efficiency.Originally posted by: Vic
Why does any car need more than 50 bhp again?Originally posted by: mariok2006
Why did they need an 8.4L V10 again?
:roll:
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: Vic
Why does any car need more than 50 bhp again?Originally posted by: mariok2006
Why did they need an 8.4L V10 again?
:roll:
My comment was towards the lack of efficiency.
What logic does that follow? The worst thing with the old one, and they keep it. You guys are great. :beer:Originally posted by: Alprazolam
Same frame and suspension as 03-06
Originally posted by: DougK62
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: Vic
Why does any car need more than 50 bhp again?Originally posted by: mariok2006
Why did they need an 8.4L V10 again?
:roll:
My comment was towards the lack of efficiency.
Explain. And PLEASE tell me you have something better than the tired and completely retarded "horsepower per liter" argument. Please.
Originally posted by: mariok2006
All i am saying is that generally american supercars follow a different way of making power. Need more power? Make it bigger. It seems like they are living in the past while Germany and Japan are using newer technology to make things more efficient, and sure, part of it is the HP/L, as worthless as it is in the real world, that is what it comes down to in racing where there are strict regulations on engine size. Why are there no american companies in F1? It makes me think they cannot compete with a strict set of rules and making 800+HP out of a 2.4L V8 or a 3.0L V10.
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: DougK62
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: Vic
Why does any car need more than 50 bhp again?Originally posted by: mariok2006
Why did they need an 8.4L V10 again?
:roll:
My comment was towards the lack of efficiency.
Explain. And PLEASE tell me you have something better than the tired and completely retarded "horsepower per liter" argument. Please.
All i am saying is that generally american supercars follow a different way of making power. Need more power? Make it bigger. It seems like they are living in the past while Germany and Japan are using newer technology to make things more efficient, and sure, part of it is the HP/L, as worthless as it is in the real world, that is what it comes down to in racing where there are strict regulations on engine size. Why are there no american companies in F1? It makes me think they cannot compete with a strict set of rules and making 800+HP out of a 2.4L V8 or a 3.0L V10.
Originally posted by: NFS4
The Z06 is better in almost every possible way and is cheaper to boot.
