10 secrets of thin people

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

CRXican

Diamond Member
Jun 9, 2004
9,062
1
0
I'm going with the "mostly genetics" crowd. I'm almost 25 years old and I'm 5'8" and weigh 130lbs. Doesn't matter how much or how little I eat.

1. They don't diet - Duh
2. They keep track of their weight - Hardly ever weigh myself
3. They exercise regularly - Off and on but has no bearing on my weight
4. They don't solve problems with food - True
5. They stop eating when they're full - Usually stop before I'm full
6. They don't surround themselves with temptation - Doesn't matter, I'm disciplined
7. They allow themselves treats - Hardly ever
8. They eat breakfast - False
9. They move, stand and fidget more - True
10. They don't skip meals - False. I can go all day without eating and then pig out at dinner

 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,562
3
0
Pretty much. I make exceptions for holidays. Currently burning off those 5 Christmas pounds. :)
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Originally posted by: dullard
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Bah, energy...mass...they're both the same thing, really. ;)
They are related not equal, but I won't go into more detail on it. I'll just point out some common calorie "math".

Suppose you ate 1 lb of pure fat and nothing else, how much weight could you possibly gain? The true answer: if you ate 1 lb of ANYTHING, at most you could gain 1 lb. If you didn't digest it all (we rarely do digest all of what we eat), then you'd gain less than 1 lb.

Now, lets see what the internet has to say about this:
[*]Google "pound to gram", result is 453.6 g.
[*]Google "calories in a gram of fat", first result. A gram of fat has 9 calories. Thus, 453.6 * 9 = 4082.4 Calories eaten.
[*]Google "calories in a pound" First result says 3500 Calories gives you 1 lb of weight gain. Thus, since you ate 4082.4 Calories you gained 1.17 lbs.

WOW! By putting in 1 lb, we suddenly have 1.17 lbs of weight! Isn't this fun, we can create mass out of thin air! I'm going to go win the nobel prize for this groundbreaking work, no one else has ever been able to do that before and it breaks the fundamental laws of science!

Or, we can realize the calorie math is all wrong. The links I gave are not abnormalities, virtually all links will give the same answers. Doctors, nutritionists, nurses, teachers, etc will all say the same thing, yet even this elementry school level math shows that what they say doesn't add up.

pssst. water. 0 calories in water, but a fat cell has water in it, hence weight.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: Amused
Both should experience the same? Does your ass hurt after pulling this shit out of it?
Geeeez, chill out.

Skinny people stop feeling hungry before fat people. Period. The longer the hunger switch stays on, the more obese a person WILL become in our given environment of easily available food and little activity.

It is quite obvious you have never starved yourself long term, nor have any idea what you're talking about. You push yourself away from the table when you're no longer hungry and have all your life. Well, fat people do the same. Only they remain hungry long after your hunger is comfortably satiated.
Hence my reason for the question:
"So are you saying that overweight people experience a perpetual feeling of extreme starvation, hence they eat constantly? "

Unfortunately, we lack any good means at this point in time to measure how a person "feels" about something.

You think that occationally skipping a dersert makes you know that you have self control???

Try this: Have EVERY meal pulled away from you while you're still famished. See how much "self control" you have. But wait, you've never had that happen long term, have you?

Do this to ANY skinny person and they will start doing all the sneaky "disgusting" things fat people do. They will start hiding food, sneaking food, hoarding food and stealing food. Your body WILL make you eat when it's hungry.

Maybe you should research this a bit more than what you've heard from diet gurus? Maybe start with the Leptin studies, perhaps?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leptin

Different people have different levels of hunger, period. People are NOT all the same. And obesity has nothing to do with self control over food/eating anymore than breathing.
Now, if you have a skinny person and meals are pulled away constantly to the point of genuine, medically observable starvation, that will generate a certain feeling in a person.
Is the assumption then that this same feeling is what is felt in an overweight person who is nowhere near the point of starvation?


Originally posted by: SMOGZINN
Originally posted by: Jeff7
So are you saying that overweight people experience a perpetual feeling of extreme starvation, hence they eat constantly?
Yes, that is exactly what he is saying, and coming from experience it is exactly correct.
Unfortunately, there's still no way to directly convey "feeling" from one person to another - it would be curious to have some way to quantify emotional states and all that. Measure the feeling experienced by someone who's a few days away from death by starvation, and compare it to the feeling of someone who feels a constant compulsion to eat, as well as to the typical feelings of hunger experienced by a skinny person.
Some day, perhaps - but not yet.


Besides, neither overweight nor skinny people starve themselves every day; both should experience the same sensation of hunger, and both should experience the same sensations of fullness.
So there is no subjectiveness in this? If both me and you eat one apple we should experience the exact same about of 'fullness' from it?
Yes, there is subjectiveness in this.
Look at what DrPizza said - he could eat a full pack of hot dogs with buns, yet he was still considered underweight. I would eat just three hot dogs with buns, and my stomach would feel full. I can't say I'd feel "satiated" per se, but it was more a matter of capacity, my stomach felt as though it was simply at its full volume.



Feeling hungry just an hour after eating? Then remind yourself that your ancient animal brain doesn't know what the hell it's talking about, that food is right there in the fridge, and that you don't need to worry about spending hours and considerable energy in hunting down some animal to eat.
Great, why don't you try this? Switch what you eat to extremely high calorie foods (like trail rations) so you don't actually starve, but only get 6oz of food a day and see how long you last on willpower. My bet is by the end of the second day you will be eating 10X the calories you intended.
A curious exercise...what are trail rations typically made of? Are they reasonably nutritious, and reasonably priced? And do they taste like old bat guano, or like genuine food? :)
If I can easily stomach them without the flavor making me gag, and aren't too pricey, I'd be up for a little experiment. I'm on a typical "poor college student" budget right now.


I won't deny thermodynamics is at work, but saying it is simple is just silly. No one is trying to say that mass magically appears, it comes form stored energy that was put into the system. The hard part is figuring out how much energy the system needs and at what point it will start to store that energy instead of use it. That mark will be different from person to person and there is no simple way to figure it out. So saying weight loss is just a matter of energy in vs energy out is just as silly as saying that rocketry is just about stored chemical energy vs released chemical energy with out ever mentioning how that energy is used.
I suppose I tend to throw "simple" around too often. General relativity and time dilation: Simple. Go fast and time slows down. I think I understand it, and it's fairly simple. The equations, not so much, but the concept is fairly simple.
Energy and matter, and going from one to the other: The concept is simple. The equation is also fairly simplistic, e=mc²
Heck, Hawking's "A Brief History of Time" was a decent, comprehensible book; I found Einstein's "Relativity: The Special and General Theory" to be a bit more involved, but still quite understandable.

"Simple" is also, well, subjective. :)


 
Dec 10, 2005
29,098
14,463
136
1. They don't diet True
2. They keep track of their weight Not really
3. They exercise regularly Try to
4. They don't solve problems with food true
5. They stop eating when they're full true
6. They don't surround themselves with temptation true
7. They allow themselves treats of course
8. They eat breakfast yes
9. They move, stand and fidget more definitely
10. They don't skip meals sometimes I skip meals
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,444
19,893
146
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Originally posted by: Amused
Both should experience the same? Does your ass hurt after pulling this shit out of it?
Geeeez, chill out.

Skinny people stop feeling hungry before fat people. Period. The longer the hunger switch stays on, the more obese a person WILL become in our given environment of easily available food and little activity.

It is quite obvious you have never starved yourself long term, nor have any idea what you're talking about. You push yourself away from the table when you're no longer hungry and have all your life. Well, fat people do the same. Only they remain hungry long after your hunger is comfortably satiated.
Hence my reason for the question:
"So are you saying that overweight people experience a perpetual feeling of extreme starvation, hence they eat constantly? "

Unfortunately, we lack any good means at this point in time to measure how a person "feels" about something.

You think that occationally skipping a dersert makes you know that you have self control???

Try this: Have EVERY meal pulled away from you while you're still famished. See how much "self control" you have. But wait, you've never had that happen long term, have you?

Do this to ANY skinny person and they will start doing all the sneaky "disgusting" things fat people do. They will start hiding food, sneaking food, hoarding food and stealing food. Your body WILL make you eat when it's hungry.

Maybe you should research this a bit more than what you've heard from diet gurus? Maybe start with the Leptin studies, perhaps?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leptin

Different people have different levels of hunger, period. People are NOT all the same. And obesity has nothing to do with self control over food/eating anymore than breathing.
Now, if you have a skinny person and meals are pulled away constantly to the point of genuine, medically observable starvation, that will generate a certain feeling in a person.
Is the assumption then that this same feeling is what is felt in an overweight person who is nowhere near the point of starvation?

No assumtion. It's proved. So,yes: The hunger switch in the brain is not shut off even though they have enough calories/food. Science has found this switch, turned it off in mice and ended up with morbidly obese mice. They stop eating long after their skinny cousins do.

And it doesn't even have to be starvation. Just prolonged and constant hunger. You eat when you're hungry and stop when you're full. So do fat people. Your body switches off the hunger and food is no longer desirable. It's the same with fat people. The difference is this: When that switch is flicked.
 

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,353
1,862
126
I am a fat person,

Most of those things apply to me too ...

I don't diet.
I am aware of my weight.
I exercize regularly.
I don't "solve problems with food"
I stop eating before I am full, when I start to feel satisfied. ********* (I don't feel "full" until I've eaten well over 2 pounds of food)
I don't "surround myself vith temptation"
I eat treats
I eat breakfast, sometimes ...
I am ALWAYS moving and figiting. I also prefer to stand over sit all the time. This is probably because of ADD in my case.
OK, I skip meals if I am busy...



I think in my case, and perhaps the same is true for others too .... The "feel full" gauge is broken. I regularly eat between 1500 and 2500 calories for lunch. Usually I am still feeling hungry, but after about 30-45 minutes it is enough to feel satisfied and not have "hunger" for 3 or 4 hours ....


 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: OUCaptain
I'm thin and I find less than half to be true.

Should have read "10 secrets of thin, healthy, and in shape people"

after reading the comments, i agree.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: Amused
Now, if you have a skinny person and meals are pulled away constantly to the point of genuine, medically observable starvation, that will generate a certain feeling in a person.
Is the assumption then that this same feeling is what is felt in an overweight person who is nowhere near the point of starvation?

No assumtion. It's proved. So,yes: The hunger switch in the brain is not shut off even though they have enough calories/food. Science has found this switch, turned it off in mice and ended up with morbidly obese mice. They stop eating long after their skinny cousins do.

And it doesn't even have to be starvation. Just prolonged and constant hunger. You eat when you're hungry and stop when you're full. So do fat people. Your body switches off the hunger and food is no longer desirable. It's the same with fat people. The difference is this: When that switch is flicked.[/quote]

That Leptin article spoke of severely obese mice. So maybe that's the reason for these people who are massively overweight, not just 30lbs over their normal weight, I'm talking several times normal weight, like 500lbs+. That's severe obesity, and a sign that something is quite amiss genetically.
What of someone who's got a decent gut and some flab here and there, but who's still within maybe 30lbs of their target weight? Depending on the person's original build, I wouldn't consider that to be morbidly obese, but it is still technically overweight.
Is that still genetic, or just a lack of mental discipline?

My point is, a lot of Americans are overweight - more and more each generation. I'm going to say that MOST of that is not due to a genetic switch being absent. A few morbidly obese people, yeah, that's likely the case, which would explain why they might be a few hundred pounds overweight. But a lot of people are just plain "overweight," but not excessively obese. That's an awful lot of genetic mutations
The Wiki article you linked to also says, "A very small group of humans possess homozygous (same on both of the pair) mutations for the leptin gene which leads to a constant desire for food, resulting in severe obesity."
I would expect genetic anomalies such as this to be the minority.


I also mentioned that humans feel and experience similar sensations of hunger: This is based on my assumption that humans are pretty much the same at birth. Nature has done a fair job of producing a very consistent product. Hence a majority of people are born with mostly identical hardware, including hardware and software meant for perceiving the environment, which includes both one's surroundings as well as inputs from their own body.
Eating habits early in life can affect how your mind perceives food later in life too. The mind is quite plastic at a young age; behaviors and patterns learned then can persist very strongly. Though, with that in said, I wonder if there have been studies done where children of overweight parents are adopted at a very young age by thin parents. That would serve to separate out some of the "nature vs nurture" disparity: Are the children "destined" to be overweight because of genetics or because of habits taught to them by overweight parents?

 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,444
19,893
146
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Originally posted by: Amused
Now, if you have a skinny person and meals are pulled away constantly to the point of genuine, medically observable starvation, that will generate a certain feeling in a person.
Is the assumption then that this same feeling is what is felt in an overweight person who is nowhere near the point of starvation?

No assumtion. It's proved. So,yes: The hunger switch in the brain is not shut off even though they have enough calories/food. Science has found this switch, turned it off in mice and ended up with morbidly obese mice. They stop eating long after their skinny cousins do.

And it doesn't even have to be starvation. Just prolonged and constant hunger. You eat when you're hungry and stop when you're full. So do fat people. Your body switches off the hunger and food is no longer desirable. It's the same with fat people. The difference is this: When that switch is flicked.

That Leptin article spoke of severely obese mice. So maybe that's the reason for these people who are massively overweight, not just 30lbs over their normal weight, I'm talking several times normal weight, like 500lbs+. That's severe obesity, and a sign that something is quite amiss genetically.
What of someone who's got a decent gut and some flab here and there, but who's still within maybe 30lbs of their target weight? Depending on the person's original build, I wouldn't consider that to be morbidly obese, but it is still technically overweight.
Is that still genetic, or just a lack of mental discipline?

My point is, a lot of Americans are overweight - more and more each generation. I'm going to say that MOST of that is not due to a genetic switch being absent. A few morbidly obese people, yeah, that's likely the case, which would explain why they might be a few hundred pounds overweight. But a lot of people are just plain "overweight," but not excessively obese. That's an awful lot of genetic mutations
The Wiki article you linked to also says, "A very small group of humans possess homozygous (same on both of the pair) mutations for the leptin gene which leads to a constant desire for food, resulting in severe obesity."
I would expect genetic anomalies such as this to be the minority.


I also mentioned that humans feel and experience similar sensations of hunger: This is based on my assumption that humans are pretty much the same at birth. Nature has done a fair job of producing a very consistent product. Hence a majority of people are born with mostly identical hardware, including hardware and software meant for perceiving the environment, which includes both one's surroundings as well as inputs from their own body.
Eating habits early in life can affect how your mind perceives food later in life too. The mind is quite plastic at a young age; behaviors and patterns learned then can persist very strongly. Though, with that in said, I wonder if there have been studies done where children of overweight parents are adopted at a very young age by thin parents. That would serve to separate out some of the "nature vs nurture" disparity: Are the children "destined" to be overweight because of genetics or because of habits taught to them by overweight parents?

[/quote]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8452057

A number of studies, including the Danish adoption study, have shown that, in adults, the familial resemblance of obesity, as measured by the body mass index (weight in kg/(height in m)2), is mainly due to genes. The body mass index may reflect both fat and fat-free body mass. In this further analysis of the Danish adoption study, the degree of obesity was assessed by a silhouette score. There was a significant relationship in scores between the adult adoptees and their biological mothers and between the adoptees and their biological full siblings reared by the biological parents. Weaker, nonsignificant associations were found for the biological fathers and for the maternal and paternal half-siblings. There were no relationships in silhouette scoring between adoptees and adoptive parents. The results confirm the results of our previous analysis of body mass index. We conclude that human obesity is under genetic control, whereas the childhood family environment has little, if any, influence on obesity in adults. It is an important task for future research to identify the genes involved.

It's nature, not nurture just as it's nature and not self-control.

 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: Amused
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8452057

A number of studies, including the Danish adoption study, have shown that, in adults, the familial resemblance of obesity, as measured by the body mass index (weight in kg/(height in m)2), is mainly due to genes. The body mass index may reflect both fat and fat-free body mass. In this further analysis of the Danish adoption study, the degree of obesity was assessed by a silhouette score. There was a significant relationship in scores between the adult adoptees and their biological mothers and between the adoptees and their biological full siblings reared by the biological parents. Weaker, nonsignificant associations were found for the biological fathers and for the maternal and paternal half-siblings. There were no relationships in silhouette scoring between adoptees and adoptive parents. The results confirm the results of our previous analysis of body mass index. We conclude that human obesity is under genetic control, whereas the childhood family environment has little, if any, influence on obesity in adults. It is an important task for future research to identify the genes involved.

It's nature, not nurture just as it's nature and not self-control.
So again, is that obesity or just being a bit overweight?
....and I'm guessing that downloading the full article is for paying customers, or else I'm just not seeing the link.

 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,359
4,640
136
Originally posted by: Jeff7
A curious exercise...what are trail rations typically made of? Are they reasonably nutritious, and reasonably priced? And do they taste like old bat guano, or like genuine food? :)
If I can easily stomach them without the flavor making me gag, and aren't too pricey, I'd be up for a little experiment. I'm on a typical "poor college student" budget right now.

Basicly think gronola bars. They normally include a lot of dryed fruits and nuts mixed with grain germ and held together with a mix of peanut butter and honey. They can me made very cheaply if you are willing to do a little cooking of your own.
I'm sure such experiments have been done in the past, but for purely personal reasons you might want to see it for your own subjective experiance.

Here is a recipe I gratuitusly stole from Alton Browns great show Good Eats.

8 ounces old-fashioned rolled oats, approximately 2 cups
1 1/2 ounces raw sunflower seeds, approximately 1/2 cup
3 ounces sliced almonds, approximately 1 cup
1 1/2 ounces wheat germ, approximately 1/2 cup
6 ounces honey, approximately 1/2 cup
1 3/4 ounces dark brown sugar, approximately 1/4 cup packed
1-ounce unsalted butter, plus extra for pan
2 teaspoons vanilla extract
1/2 teaspoon kosher salt
6 1/2 ounces chopped dried fruit, any combination of apricots, cherries or blueberries
 

Molondo

Platinum Member
Sep 6, 2005
2,529
1
0
As i was reading your list, i said to my self "this is so obvious it must be an MSN article"

And to be honest, metabolism plays a big part in someones weight. My roommate eats considerably less than me and he still seems to gain weight more than me.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: SMOGZINN
Originally posted by: Jeff7
A curious exercise...what are trail rations typically made of? Are they reasonably nutritious, and reasonably priced? And do they taste like old bat guano, or like genuine food? :)
If I can easily stomach them without the flavor making me gag, and aren't too pricey, I'd be up for a little experiment. I'm on a typical "poor college student" budget right now.

Basicly think gronola bars. They normally include a lot of dryed fruits and nuts mixed with grain germ and held together with a mix of peanut butter and honey. They can me made very cheaply if you are willing to do a little cooking of your own.
I'm sure such experiments have been done in the past, but for purely personal reasons you might want to see it for your own subjective experiance.

Here is a recipe I gratuitusly stole from Alton Browns great show Good Eats.

8 ounces old-fashioned rolled oats, approximately 2 cups
1 1/2 ounces raw sunflower seeds, approximately 1/2 cup
3 ounces sliced almonds, approximately 1 cup
1 1/2 ounces wheat germ, approximately 1/2 cup
6 ounces honey, approximately 1/2 cup
1 3/4 ounces dark brown sugar, approximately 1/4 cup packed
1-ounce unsalted butter, plus extra for pan
2 teaspoons vanilla extract
1/2 teaspoon kosher salt
6 1/2 ounces chopped dried fruit, any combination of apricots, cherries or blueberries
About how many calories would be in the 6oz daily portions?
Can these 6oz be split up as seen fit?

Substitutions:
Can those 3oz of sliced almonds be replaced with some other kind of nut? Almonds are nasty. ;)
The butter: Can it be regular salted butter?
Is regular iodized salt also acceptable?

And what is permissible for drinking?



Also perhaps of note: Obviously, activity level affects my appetite. If it's just a day of neffing, then obviously I won't be using a lot of energy, nor will I be eating much. Back when I worked at a warehouse, I was using quite a lot of energy for at least 8 hours each day, thus I'd eat and drink a lot more. But that's to be expected from anyone.


 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,444
19,893
146
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Originally posted by: Amused
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8452057

A number of studies, including the Danish adoption study, have shown that, in adults, the familial resemblance of obesity, as measured by the body mass index (weight in kg/(height in m)2), is mainly due to genes. The body mass index may reflect both fat and fat-free body mass. In this further analysis of the Danish adoption study, the degree of obesity was assessed by a silhouette score. There was a significant relationship in scores between the adult adoptees and their biological mothers and between the adoptees and their biological full siblings reared by the biological parents. Weaker, nonsignificant associations were found for the biological fathers and for the maternal and paternal half-siblings. There were no relationships in silhouette scoring between adoptees and adoptive parents. The results confirm the results of our previous analysis of body mass index. We conclude that human obesity is under genetic control, whereas the childhood family environment has little, if any, influence on obesity in adults. It is an important task for future research to identify the genes involved.

It's nature, not nurture just as it's nature and not self-control.
So again, is that obesity or just being a bit overweight?
....and I'm guessing that downloading the full article is for paying customers, or else I'm just not seeing the link.

It covers the range from overweight to obese. Simple discrepancies and similarities in BMIs.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: Amused
It covers the range from overweight to obese. Simple discrepancies and similarities in BMIs.
Interesting; is it expensive to do this genetic testing to find this anomalous leptin gene in humans?

The possibilities I see:
- Few people have this genetic anomaly; they are the morbidly obese members of the population. The rest are simply not disciplined enough, and thus gain a little bit of weight, but not enough to qualify as obese.

- This genetic anomaly is in fact fairly common, as may be the case with blue eyes, but it only is able to manifest itself in first-world countries where there are adequate quantities of food available so as to bring on excessive weight gain.


 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: Molondo
As i was reading your list, i said to my self "this is so obvious it must be an MSN article"

And to be honest, metabolism plays a big part in someones weight. My roommate eats considerably less than me and he still seems to gain weight more than me.

yeh, it was so boring and so obvious that no one bothered to respond. :confused:
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,444
19,893
146
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Molondo
As i was reading your list, i said to my self "this is so obvious it must be an MSN article"

And to be honest, metabolism plays a big part in someones weight. My roommate eats considerably less than me and he still seems to gain weight more than me.

yeh, it was so boring and so obvious that no one bothered to respond. :confused:

Of course. We're all here 'cause ur a hottie!
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Molondo
As i was reading your list, i said to my self "this is so obvious it must be an MSN article"

And to be honest, metabolism plays a big part in someones weight. My roommate eats considerably less than me and he still seems to gain weight more than me.

yeh, it was so boring and so obvious that no one bothered to respond. :confused:

Of course. We're all here 'cause ur a hottie!

i'm following yer ass actually. ;)
 

AstroManLuca

Lifer
Jun 24, 2004
15,628
5
81
A friend of mine is skinny as fuck and I know exactly why. It's because his stomach is microscopic. Whenever we eat a meal together, he's always talking about how he feels full after eating a very small amount of food. Something that is just right for me (not hungry but not too full after eating) is so filling to him that he complains of feeling so stuffed he can barely walk.

Maybe these things build up over time. I'm thinking since my stomach is larger, it takes more food for me to feel full, which of course makes it that much harder to lose weight. He also doesn't seem to suffer from any lagtime - he will stop eating in the middle of a meal, whereas I will sometimes continue to feel hungry for several minutes after finishing a meal, even a large one.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,444
19,893
146
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: moshquerade
Originally posted by: Molondo
As i was reading your list, i said to my self "this is so obvious it must be an MSN article"

And to be honest, metabolism plays a big part in someones weight. My roommate eats considerably less than me and he still seems to gain weight more than me.

yeh, it was so boring and so obvious that no one bothered to respond. :confused:

Of course. We're all here 'cause ur a hottie!

i'm following yer ass actually. ;)

My ass has nothing to do with this.