- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,777
- 6,787
- 136
Where are those 500$ 8C PHX.?.what's the point of tiny kraken when you get used phoenix full 8core machine for 500 bucks 😭
Sonoma *valley*Is that the rumored Samsung node chip? Sonoma Point?
Single core results are low. I guess maybe clock speeds are much lower than TSMC.
Where are those 500$ 8C PHX.?.
At this price you wont even find a 6C PHX2.
That s PHX/PHX2 offerings in Germany wich is the most competitive european market, all prices have 19% VAT included.
![]()
Notebooks mit Codename AMD: Phoenix Preisvergleich Geizhals Deutschland
Preisvergleich und Bewertungen für Notebooks mit Codename AMD: Phoenixgeizhals.de
The chip isn't horrible but OEMs have been very disingenuous selling it in premium laptops. I know someone who bought an ASUS OLED laptop in mid-2024 (manufactured same year) for close to 700 euros. It's fine for normal work but the multicore performance is severely lacking for something priced so high.7520U wasn't the end apparently.
Zen 6 Halo will be even more amazing I think and I really don’t believe anyone can match it the whole package. 256 bit up to 192GB RAM, Zen6 cores and RDNA5. Really the pinnacle of mobile computing.Review of an HP laptop with a 12 cores STH 390.
Gonna be a bunch of competition there.Zen 6 Halo will be even more amazing I think and I really don’t believe anyone can match it the whole package. 256 bit up to 192GB RAM, Zen6 cores and RDNA5. Really the pinnacle of mobile computing.
Also look at the difference in battery life compared to the OLED model. Much better.Zen 6 Halo will be even more amazing I think and I really don’t believe anyone can match it the whole package. 256 bit up to 192GB RAM, Zen6 cores and RDNA5. Really the pinnacle of mobile computing.
Yep but really it’s interesting to see how Qualcomm and Nvidia deal with x86 emulation apps and games. Intel too with NVL-halo but I don’t see it being as good as Zen 6 Halo.Gonna be a bunch of competition there.
Hopefully HP stepping in will lead other OEMs to follow suite.Also look at the difference in battery life compared to the OLED model. Much better.
I’m very impressed. Hopefully, in the future we can get more efficient OLED panels from HP.
Mainly Nvidia. I don't have much hope from QC. They are just doing this as a side experiment. They don't really care if they fail or even drop out of the market later. Their main business will keep them well fed for decades unless something changes drastically.Yep but really it’s interesting to see how Qualcomm and Nvidia deal with x86 emulation apps and games.
Gonna be a bunch of competition there.
Their side experiment ended when they brought NUVIA. Gerard and his team are long time drivers roadmap architects, I expect great CPU IP from them.Mainly Nvidia. I don't have much hope from QC. They are just doing this as a side experiment. They don't really care if they fail or even drop out of the market later. Their main business will keep them well fed for decades unless something changes drastically.
9950X3D craze has left lots of 9950X yearning for a home. AMD should take note and next time release the X3D parts first so they don't end up with unwanted SKU inventory.
These are all the people who used to pay for the Intel K and KS SKUs. Now those aren't good enough anymore and Raptor Lake is really old at this point so they have no choice but to spend on the best CPU money can buy.I don't understand it.
I do think they get over recommended compared to the vanilla versions, especially for people who just do light gaming. But for those who game a lot, minimum frame rates and dips are some of the most annoying things. I'm increasingly in favor of having a base CPU level before I even look at the GPU for a setup. Sure is nice to average very high for 60-90% of a game at GPU limit, but at least for me those drops and variations because its waiting for CPU are something I tolerate less and less and am increasingly willing to sacrifice peak/max fps for.The X3D craze is insane. Who would pay $230 more for the X3D version? Apparantly, a lot. I don't understand it. The X3D chips are nice at lower resolutions but not that nice for the cost when Zen 6 should be out later next year.
These are all the people who used to pay for the Intel K and KS SKUs. Now those aren't good enough anymore and Raptor Lake is really old at this point so they have no choice but to spend on the best CPU money can buy.
I do think they get over recommended compared to the vanilla versions, especially for people who just do light gaming. But for those who game a lot, minimum frame rates and dips are some of the most annoying things. I'm increasingly in favor of having a base CPU level before I even look at the GPU for a setup. Sure is nice to average very high for 60-90% of a game at GPU limit, but at least for me those drops and variations because its waiting for CPU are something I tolerate less and less and am increasingly willing to sacrifice peak/max fps for.
Low mininums do suck. But I'd imagine game developers realize the X3D is a small minority of gamers. Most probably do it on a prebuilt or laptop. The X3D market just gets a bonus,
I am going to guess that majority of current game developers are now developing on X3D computers, and maybe 2-3 years down the road, that level of performance will be a requirement.