Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)

[DisEnchantment]

Speculate at will

 

[fastandfurious6]

looks disappointing if true but scores should be much higher, it's x16 zen5 + double bandwidth

r23 score is same as zen 4 7945hx - maybe the efficiency in 90w shown vs 140w+ ? but it plateaus at 90w

timespy, 7735hs is zen 3... at 70w it's 8000 vs 9000 only?

 

[Philste]

7735hs is zen 3... at 70w it's 8000 vs 9000 only?

It's some laptop dGPU, Rembrandt iGPU should max out below 3k.

 

[leoneazzurro]

In the notes it says Asus TUF A16 Advantage Edition, so it could be a Radeon 7600S or a 7700S, difficult to judge because it seems not set at max TDP.

 

[fastandfurious6]

yeah those graphs are really bad 🤣 also doesn't make sense R23 is only ~33000, should be higher closer to 9950x score

 

[StefanR5R]

closer to 9950x score

...if the 9950X is configured to ≤90 W, yes. (Or let's say ≤110 W due to IOD and GMI overhead.)

 

[MS_AT]

Strix halo looking good

Could you link the source?

looks disappointing if true but scores should be much higher, it's x16 zen5 + double bandwidth

Here we go again, could you show R23 scaling with memory bandwidth?

R23 is only ~33000, should be higher closer to 9950x score

And have you measured how well 9950x scores in the 13inch tablet with tons of Asus bloatware installed and pre-release firmware limited to 80W?

 

[adroc_thurston]

if true but scores should be much higher, it's x16 zen5 + double bandwidth

It's cinememe

 

[Det0x]

AMD have gotten their own APO it seems




Wonder what programs is supported and how it affects performance..
New chipset driver is recommened for the newest ageasa

hey guys agesa 1203 bios solve unknown device problem
just need install new chipset driver

AMD chipset driver 7.01.08.129
*Improves performance for 2CCD Raphael and Granite Ridge CPUs

 

[CouncilorIrissa]

It's some laptop dGPU, Rembrandt iGPU should max out below 3k.

It's 7600S IIRC.

 

[CakeMonster]

Wonder what programs is supported and how it affects performance..
New chipset driver is recommened for the newest ageasa

Slightly worried, are they possibly bringing the 9950X scheduling to 7950X?

 

[fastandfurious6]

And have you measured how well 9950x scores in the 13inch tablet with tons of Asus bloatware installed and pre-release firmware limited to 80W?

you might be right about that. super impressive they put a whole 9950x + 4060 in a goddamn tablet

my comment was about the plateau on the graph but the graph is just bad

 

[gaav87]

Oh it was 7600S vs strix halo igpu with 200W psu. I forgot i posted that. There are also 300W psu versions.

 

[CouncilorIrissa]

AMD's Strix Halo - Under the Hood

Hello you fine Internet folks,

chipsandcheese.com

No power, same high bandwidth, 32 bytes per cycle in both directions, lower latency.

So unless the interconnect clocks massively higher, the read throughput from IOD to CCD remains the same as on GNR.
UPD: oh they're clocking the IF in-between 1-2 GHz.

 

[branch_suggestion]

AMD's Strix Halo - Under the Hood

Hello you fine Internet folks,

chipsandcheese.com

So unless the interconnect clocks massively higher, the read throughput from IOD to CCD remains the same as on GNR.

2/3 benefits already met, the last can be saved for Medusa, plus they can juice the clocks for the given platform.
It is a proof on concept pipe cleaner after all, don't want to do too much modding.

 

[adroc_thurston]

So unless the interconnect clocks massively higher, the read throughput from IOD to CCD remains the same as on GNR.

Ahhh they cucked it to 1*32B fabric-side. Lame.

oh they're clocking the IF in-between 1-2 GHz.

That's what it always did.

 

[CouncilorIrissa]

Ahhh they cucked it to 1*32B fabric-side. Lame.

That's what it always did.

I haven't finished watching the interview at the time I posted this and was hoping that they'd at least clock it higher with STXH, but no.

So yeah, we're stuck with 64 GB/s read bw per CCD.

 

[MS_AT]

AMD's Strix Halo - Under the Hood

Hello you fine Internet folks,

chipsandcheese.com

So unless the interconnect clocks massively higher, the read throughput from IOD to CCD remains the same as on GNR.
UPD: oh they're clocking the IF in-between 1-2 GHz.

So as always after AMD interview a guessing game begins. What is the actual CCD to IOD connection speed.

In Granite Ridge we have 32B read and 16B write. (https://chipsandcheese.com/p/amds-turin-5th-gen-epyc-launched)
In Turin we have 32B read and 32B write (https://chipsandcheese.com/p/amds-turin-5th-gen-epyc-launched)
In Halo apparently also 32B and 32B write but quoting the interview

So the first big change between a Granite or a 9950X3D and this the Strix Halo always the die to die interconnect. Low power, same high bandwidth, 32 bytes per cycle in both directions, lower latency.

It might be a transcript issue, he might have misspoken, or it might be another case of "two decoders are able to work on 1T instruction stream" case

Still if the statement is accurate then they did double the bandwidth, just the write bandwidth compared to desktop zen5

Also I was surprised that GMI physical is clocked at 20GHz and I am not sure how it works exactly if the clocks reported by software show 2GHz.

We are able to get power benefits. Because prior to that, we had a GMI PHY that lived in there and that consumed a whole lot of power in order to be able to send this over high frequencies over short distances. Here we are clocking it at a way less than the 20 gigs that the GMI was being clocked at.

 

[adroc_thurston]

Also I was surprised that GMI physical is clocked at 20GHz and I am not sure how it works exactly if the clocks reported by software show 2GHz.

Up to 32G actually. But you never see any GMI data really, it's all abstracted by the SMU.

 

[yuri69]

So unless the interconnect clocks massively higher, the read throughput from IOD to CCD remains the same as on GNR.
UPD: oh they're clocking the IF in-between 1-2 GHz.

Classic AMD - the cheapo company.

 

[igor_kavinski]

Classic AMD - the cheapo company.

But that's how they keep innovating. By staying cheap. Look at Intel. Threw mounds of cash at their problems and almost at the verge of bankruptcy.

But with people now going crazy for the X3D, maybe they will start spending a bit more to give us better products.

 

[eek2121]

2 x USB4 + other gen 3 and 2.
16 PCIe lanes.

You can have an x8 to an external GPU + 2xSSD, or 4x to an I/O hub, 8x to a GPU, and 1xssd, or 4xssd, or a few thunderbolt ports and a couple SSDs.

Why would you use a GPU with this part outside of eventual upgrades (when games become too demanding to run, which won’t happen for a long time)

Except they will pair it with crappy LPDDR5. Mendocino has 5500 MT/s and it's almost atrocious.

Meh, bandwidth is fine.

How about +100 or +150?

My 7950x won’t do +50 even. It jumps off the motherboard and runs away if I even think about enabling PBO.

And this at the end:

Overall, other aspects remain mostly unchanged but there is a high probability that AMD's Ryzen sales could overtake Intel this quarter. Budget Ryzen 9000 non-X CPUs will go neck and neck against Arrow Lake non-K, though AMD has a clear platform advantage.

Fallen, Intel has.

In the notes it says Asus TUF A16 Advantage Edition, so it could be a Radeon 7600S or a 7700S, difficult to judge because it seems not set at max TDP.

Ignore early benchmarks, and ignore benchmarks from a single product. Consider it a ballpark.

AMD have gotten their own APO it seems
View attachment 114842

View attachment 114843

Wonder what programs is supported and how it affects performance..
New chipset driver is recommened for the newest ageasa

Sadly, best ASUS has given me is AGESA 1.2.0.2b

I haven't finished watching the interview at the time I posted this and was hoping that they'd at least clock it higher with STXH, but no.

So yeah, we're stuck with 64 GB/s read bw per CCD.

Lame

Classic AMD - the cheapo company.

They have to save some gains for next gen. 🤣

They never know if Intel might pull another Core(tm) moment.

Cheers🥂

 

[igor_kavinski]

My 7950x won’t do +50 even. It jumps off the motherboard and runs away if I even think about enabling PBO.

I think you just have a crappy mobo with insufficient power stages and other inferior components. ITX mobos aren't supposed to be for overclocking.

 

[igor_kavinski]

Meh, bandwidth is fine.

Try using Mendocino. It's sad. The latency is over 100ns.

 

[CouncilorIrissa]

It might be a transcript issue, he might have misspoken, or it might be another case of "two decoders are able to work on 1T instruction stream" case

Not a transcript issue, that's exactly what he said. 3:36

I think he simply misspoke and meant that 32B/cycle behavior is similar to that of Strix Point.

 

[Keller_TT]

But that's how they keep innovating. By staying cheap. Look at Intel. Threw mounds of cash at their problems and almost at the verge of bankruptcy.

But with people now going crazy for the X3D, maybe they will start spending a bit more to give us better products.

Where Intel vacates, a far more capable and relentless competitor will arrive in NV with their ARM SoC for Windows this year. Intel had a sizable process leadership when they went around as chipzilla that masked architecture deficiencies, and x86 was unassailable in computing. All that is gone now.

NV will keep AMD on its toes in the principal form factor that non-gamers buy PCs - laptops or mini PCs where AMD has more paper products than actual OEM push. It's even worse outside US. Strix Point is too overpriced to ride on AI PC shite marketing. I hope NV arrives with a bang to show AMD the mirror in every Strix tier, including a NV AI+Gaming Halo range.