Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)

Page 140 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Doug S

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2020
3,425
6,071
136
It's not about the timing it's about the PDK you've picked.

And if TSMC isn't going to produce any N3B wafers once N3E comes online, then Intel would have to port their design. Which wouldn't be much of an issue, if this change in plans was done far enough ahead of time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek

Tigerick

Senior member
Apr 1, 2022
804
766
106
Who said they won't?

IT IS.
AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT.
SET. OF PDKs.
The two nodes have nothing in common.
Hmm, so do you think Apple will maintain two different process nodes in parallel in the future? Let N3B handles high end SoC (A18 Pro & M3 series?) and N3E handles mainstream SoC ???
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,637
7,121
136
Keeping this on topic, is there any reason to think AMD would have used N3/N3B for anything? I imagine they would have to cancel it or port it to N3E, causing delays.
 

Doug S

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2020
3,425
6,071
136
Will they?

Apple operates like a galley full of slaves (well, most left by now), Intel doesn't.

Doesn't Intel have like five different design teams? They would have way more bandwidth to do this than Apple, your silly claim about galley slaves notwithstanding.
 

adroc_thurston

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2023
6,342
8,933
106