- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,777
- 6,791
- 136
Yeah, I'm not getting excited in the least. AMD marketing is prone to hype. Some would say over-hype. They will be better than Arrow Lake but don't think the difference will be huge like that between a P-core and an E-core. Going by what Adroc seems to be implying, you would think ARL will be limping whereas Zen 5 will be running like a frickin' cheetah.if zen 5 performance is a similar oe lesser bump intel may look like the better option provided your home owners insurance covers incidentals such as fire.
AMD has been very good when it comes to their processor hype under Ryzen. It's well deserved. Adroc was going by the early leaks on ARL we all saw and were perplexed by. We'll see more leaks as we head into 2024 but I'm not giving too much confidence into Intel despite wanting them to make a comeback of some kind.Yeah, I'm not getting excited in the least. AMD marketing is prone to hype. Some would say over-hype. They will be better than Arrow Lake but don't think the difference will be huge like that between a P-core and an E-core. Going by what Adroc seems to be implying, you would think ARL will be limping whereas Zen 5 will be running like a frickin' cheetah.
You pay in area and somewhat in power.It's gotta bite AMD in the butt somehow.
They don't even talk about stuff before it launches.AMD marketing is prone to hype.
It's gotta bite AMD in the butt somehow. Nothing is perfect, unless they sacrificed the most nubile available virgins on Earth.
....... and I took that personally 😆I haven't noticed a decrease in the population of any tech forums, so I'm skeptical about any virgin sacrifices having taken place.
Be careful. Some day you might slip on a banana skin and exclaim, "Damn you, Igor!"for him bananas are on an equal footing.
That doesn't work as you think it does. Only fruit I've ever slipped on was a half crushed apple in my youth at a festival. a pile of leaves is more dangerous than banana peels.Be careful. Some day you might slip on a banana skin and exclaim, "Damn you, Igor!"![]()
That doesn't work as you think it does. Only fruit I've ever slipped on was a half crushed apple in my youth at a festival. a pile of leaves is more dangerous than banana peels.
You pay in area and somewhat in power.
Otherwise they're just better than anyone else in the industry.
They talk a bit about upcoming products, but not on details.They don't even talk about stuff before it launches.
Like, you ain't getting a MI300 technical deep dive until ISSCC'24.
I'm highly suspicious of any of those old news reports. I think we need to lay out 20-30 peels and have tech youtubers do running sprints on them and see who crashes into what and who slips and breaks a hip.You sure about that?
![]()
Nvidia made some blunders in the past that set them level with AMD/ATI or just behind. I think Nvidia's execution has been great the last decade. Some generations offer up more some aren't that great if you're coming from the prior generation but certainly good if you're a few generations behind. Jensen once said that Nvidia just sin't a hardware company but a software company first or too. He wasn't being facetious. NVidia has made great strides in software implement for their professional hardware and make a good effort to making sure things work for us measly consumers. They have their faults, too. AMD's lack of chit chat on the mi300 makes me often wonder if there's even a physical product to buy or it's all talk and they really don't have the orders for it even though common sense and news dictates they in fact due have those clients.Arguably tied with Apple - but that's a completely different market. Nvidia has pretty good execution as well - for GPUs.
They talk a bit about upcoming products, but not on details.
It is interesting that AMD are staying so quiet about the MI300 overall. I would imagine, as this is the first in a line of world class HPC/ML GPU-Compute products, that AMD is focusing on SIs and Developers to build up a strong foundation for their customer's needs. Nvidia is well ahead in total platform development with an excellent hardware and software stack - AMD will need to work hard to grab share from them (and the C-suite seems determined to invest accordingly).
No, way better than Apple since AMD can actually clock their cores up worth a damn.Arguably tied with Apple
They've been rather conservative for a while; gotta see how SM_100 goes before calling anything out.Nvidia has pretty good execution as well - for GPUs.
The absolute bare minumum with zero details.They talk a bit about upcoming products
Funny stick, plenty of customer engagements so they're rather busy.It is interesting that AMD are staying so quiet about the MI300 overall.
Ehhh hardware one could argue, software, especially for deployment at scale yea.Nvidia is well ahead in total platform development with an excellent hardware and software stack
AMD is also lean enough to focus and make that focus pay off.(and the C-suite seems determined to invest accordingly).
Perhaps amd should have injected more into rgt so they didn't end up with an overpriced half baked vegan potato.AMD is also lean enough to focus and make that focus pay off.
RDNA3 wasn't about money at all.Perhaps amd should have injected more into rgt so they didn't end up with an overpriced half baked vegan potato.
You've claimed it didn't work out and they couldn't, but I think they might have ignored the entire issue if they spent more time in rd rather than playing it as they did. rgt has been slacking for several years. RDNA2 is great though.RDNA3 wasn't about money at all.
Yes, some things just go wrong.You've claimed it didn't work out and they couldn't
I think that kind of thinking comes from an incorrect assessment of what Apple needs to do to maintain high profits, which is all they care about. No need to for high clocks in mobile devices. And those mobile targeted core are the basis of their M series lineup. So, yeah, another 500MHz in laptops and +1GHz on say a Mac Studio would be awesome from the perspective of them being 'PCs' , but given that the M series SoCs, again, are based around an architecture designed to produce the highest performance achievable with really low power usage - I think their execution is top shelf.No, way better than Apple since AMD can actually clock their cores up worth a damn.
There is in laptops, they need that 1t.No need to for high clocks in mobile devices.
That's a meme, a pile of Z5c's will do that just as well.but given that the M series SoCs, again, are based around an architecture designed to produce the highest performance achievable with really low power usage
that is putting it lightly friend. what will be the tjmax for zen 5?Yes, some things just go wrong.
Nah, it's still competitive enough PPA.that is putting it lightly friend
Same as Zen4 for vanilla/v$ respectively.what will be the tjmax for zen 5?
that's overselling it no? the 7900xtx was better off as a 7800 or 7800xt.Nah, it's still competitive enough PPA.
Just not leadership at intended.
ok and magical ram speeds will be what then?Same as Zen4 for vanilla/v$ respectively.