- Mar 3, 2017
- 1,777
- 6,791
- 136
They never listed them for the 7950X3D either. Not sure if incompetent or deliberately misleading. For AMD either seems plausible.Anybody seen 3d chiplet clocks for 9950x3d? AMD's site just show usual "up to 5.7", without breaking down by chiplet type.
Oh you're right. It's 4+4 and Z2E is a weird Strix Point chop.Do I get it right, that Z2 Extreme is based on cut down Strix Point (3 big cores, 5 dense cores) and Krackan gets a new die (4 big cores, 4 dense cores)?
You will get your chance when Minisforum releases it for $699 or less.Still the availability of Halo in only 3 products, 2 business focused doesn't give me hopes I will be able to buy one before they will become obsolete.
Did you expect them to admit this? lol! Of course they did. They are working on new hardware.valve representative just denied this, no z2 steam deck
From what I gather, the boost clocks are 5.7 ghz for the 3D chiplet. This is from the rumor mill, however, so we will see at launch.They never listed them for the 7950X3D either. Not sure if incompetent or deliberately misleading. For AMD either seems plausible.
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/project-digits/ seems like a direct competitor for Halo in compact desktop workstations. Still the availability of Halo in only 3 products, 2 business focused doesn't give me hopes I will be able to buy one before they will become obsolete.
IMO this is still better than expected. I expected they would cancel it.Still the availability of Halo in only 3 products, 2 business focused doesn't give me hopes I will be able to buy one before they will become obsolete.
They have done it before in some EPYC parts. Examples:I am unaware of AMD disabling any L3 cache on a chiplet since Zen 3 debuted in 2020
Perhaps you have been misled by measurements which did not show per core power but something else. Furthermore, 3rd party measurements of Zen 5c have only happened for Strix Point yet, on which such measurements need to take the large difference of last-level cache size per core between classic and dense cores into account.Zen 5c has worse efficiency at the same clock rate
They're worse per AMD's own statements at ISSCC 2024.
At ISSCC 2024 AMD said:This area optimization enables “Zen 4c” to deliver more than 25% improvement in performance/mm2, and 9% improvement in performance/W on SPECrate®2017_int_base [3], as compared to “Zen 4.” “Zen 4c” can operate up to 3.1GHz in frequency in a server configuration, while delivering more power-efficient performance.
Pretty sure there is just some solidified confusion on his part.Pretty sure that wasn't iso $$.
Nevermind that they can. Yet when "everyone else" is doing 4+4 it's 4x large µarch + 4x small µarch, while when AMD is doing either 4+4 or 3+5, it's 8x large µarch.AMD just can't do 4+4 like everyone else.
They showed three Strix Halo devices. I don't get why they'd put it in a miniPC.any list showing the laptops with HALO and FIRE RANGE 9955hx? the models matter
only found a few
HALO: Asus rog flow x13 , which else?
9955HX: Asus rog Strix G18 , MSI vector A18 , both with nvidia 5000 blackwell
both models are mid
Zephyrus G14 is Strix Point 370HX + nvidia 5000
way too many arrow lake laptops......
They showed three Strix Halo devices. I don't get why they'd put it in a miniPC.
View attachment 114396
Much easier to cool that way and it can run at full power without any heat related impediments.I don't get why they'd put it in a miniPC.
the internal battery measures 74.5 Wh.
HP promises up to 14 hours of battery life, though this probably only applies to the IPS option.
Yeah, it was part of the Halo design. Supposedly it has 2 low power Zen 5 cores IN THE GPUIOD for this purpose, according to past rumored specs. It was needed. Zen 5 dual CCD desktop has terrible idle consumption. They couldnt do that with a serious mobile dual CCD setup.Idle power of Strix Halo look quite good given the gigantic SoC design, HP state 5.32W for the full laptop with IPS screen.
![]()
Small powerhouse with Strix Halo: HP ZBook Ultra 14 G1a launches with Ryzen AI Max Pro
Strix Halo goes ZBook: HP is one of the launch partners of AMD for its new Ryzen AI Max Platform. The new HP ZBook Ultra 14 G1a is a compact workstation that may compete well against the Apple MacBook Pro 14.www.notebookcheck.net
Remember my 9900X for $309 post the other day? Same thing happened to me until someone here pointed it out. Just searched 9900X in Amazon at it came up. The listing disappeared in less than an hour and came up as $439 shipped by Amazon, lol.I guess I don't understand. The URL is amazon, how could it be a fraud ??
I personally find miniPC form factor the most interesting for Halo. Since it has efficiency enhancements and seems to be capable of running inference of usable LLMs at usable speed, it sounds like a good candidate for efficient home server (if you would like to run LLMs locally).I don't get why they'd put it in a miniPC
Pretty sure there is just some solidified confusion on his part.
I can understand why Zen 5 is on N4 , but ... ... from my infinite ignorance ... I wouldn't have thought RDNA4 would ALSO be manufactured on 4 nanometers ...
GPUs ... those power hungry devices. It would make perfect sense to miniaturize them to contain those ultra high power demands ...
Prices are made by the OEMs and retailers, and so far there s was no competition in the Strix Point segment, that will change with Intel releasing some mobile SKUs.
As for KRK they are branding it as entreprise and everyday users dedicated, that s not exactly a high price segment, and the much cut down GPU is an indication that it s not a HPoint replacement, at the start itshould be in 800-1200€ laptops as long as the Zen 4 mobile inventory has not dried up, wich will take at least one year.
![]()
![]()
AMD Krackan (Point): Günstigere Langläufer-APUs mit Zen 5(c), RDNA 3.5 & 50 TOPS
Unter der Strix-Point/Halo-Familie ist noch Platz: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 und Ryzen AI 5 340 debütieren hier, Codename Krackan (Point).www.computerbase.de
Here is a graph directly for Zen 4 APUs, comparing a 6c/12t Phoenix 2 with a 6c/1t Phoenix, made by AMD:It's pretty much as I remember?
That's not true, it's 28W. Which is what vendors also generally ship. Of course, you can change it so you're still not stuck with it.Default TDPs of both parts are 15 W.
Did you expect them to admit this? lol! Of course they did. They are working on new hardware.
From what I gather, the boost clocks are 5.7 ghz for the 3D chiplet. This is from the rumor mill, however, so we will see at launch.